A Qualitative Analysis of WhatsApp Integration on Speaking Vocabulary Development

Authors

  • Raja Muhammad Ishtiaq Khan Majma’ah University, Saudi Arabia
  • Alaa Alahmadi Department of English, College of Science and Arts, King Abdulaziz University, Rabigh, Saudi Arabia
  • Noor Raha Mohd Radzuan Centre for Modern Languages, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Muhammad Shahbaz Department of English, GC Women University Sialkot, Sialkot, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v17i1.146-163

Abstract

The use of mobile devices is common in the development of language learning, and it has remarkable effects on fostering language instruction. The present study is a qualitative attempt to determine the learners’ attitudes on integrating m-learning in developing the vocabulary of speaking performance. The study used a qualitative research method to attain the data. 25 EFL learners were the participants of the study. Semi-Structured interviews were used to gather the learners’ responses. The findings suggest that learners endorsed the m-learning app to develop vocabulary learning for speaking performance. More specifically, the analysis of the data exhibited that the use of WhatsApp deemed usleful in the retention of vocabualry for spoken proficiency.

References

Behera, S. K. (2013). E-and M-Learning: A comparative study. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4(3), 65-78.

Cavus, N., Shukshina, L., Chernova, O., Telezhko, I., Ishmuradova, A., & Zakharova, V. (2020). Perceptions of Foreign Language Teachers for M-Learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(23), 95-107.

Chang, C.-S., Chen, T.-S., & Hsu, W.-H. (2011). The study on integrating WebQuest with mobile learning for environmental education. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1228-1239.

Chiang, F. K., Zhu, G., Wang, Q., Cui, Z., Cai, S., & Yu, S. (2016). Research and trends in mobile learning from 1976 to 2013: A content analysis of patents in selected databases. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1006-1019.

Creswell, J. (2012). Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Researc: Pearson Education. http://basu. nahad. ir/uploads/creswell. pdf.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Mapping the field of mixed methods research: SAGE publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches: Sage publications.

Estarki, N. K., & Bazyar, M. (2016). The effect of MALL on pre-intermediate EFL learners' writing performance. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 5(2), 406.

Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer assisted language learning, 27(1), 70-105.

Hockly, N. (2013). Mobile learning. Elt Journal, 67(1), 80-84.

Khan, I., Ibrahim, A. H., Kassim, A., & Khan, R. M. I. (2019). Evaluating the efficacy of active reading software in enhancing EFL learners’ reading comprehension skills. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(12), 1861-1869.

Khan, I., Ibrahim, A. H., Kassim, A., & Khan, R. M. I. (2020). Exploring The EFI Learners' Attitudes Towards the Integration of Active Reading Software in Learning Reading Comprehension at Tertiary Level. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends & Practices, 248-266.

Khan, R., Radzuan, N., Alkhunaizan, A., Mustafa, G., & Khan, I. (2019). The efficacy of MALL instruction in business English learning.

Khan, R. M. I., Mustafa, G., & Awan, A. A. Learners’ Attitudes on the Infusion of Cooperative Learning in Education.

Khan, R. M. I., Radzuan, N. R. M., Shahbaz, M., & Ibrahim, A. H. (2018). EFL Instructors’ Perceptions on the Integration and Implementation of MALL in EFL Classes. International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics, 39-50.

Khan, R. M. I., Shahbaz, M., Kumar, T., & Khan, I. (2020). Investigating Reading Challenges Faced by EFL Learners at Elementary Level. Register Journal, 13(2), 277-292.

Kim, J. S., & Kizildag, M. (2011). M‐learning: next generation hotel training system. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology.

Kukulska-Hulme, A., Evans, D., & Traxler, J. (2005). Landscape study in wireless and mobile learning in the post-16 sector.

Kukulska‐Hulme, A. (2010). Mobile learning as a catalyst for change: Taylor & Francis.

Kukulska‐Hulme, A., & Viberg, O. (2018). Mobile collaborative language learning: State of the art. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 207-218.

Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of educational psychology, 93(1), 187.

Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7(1), 23-48.

Noriega, H. S. R. (2016). Mobile learning to improve writing in ESL teaching. Teflin Journal, 27(2), 182-202.

Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach: Oxford University Press.

Papadakis, S. (2018). Evaluating pre-service teachers' acceptance of mobile devices with regards to their age and gender: a case study in Greece. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 12(4), 336-352.

Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2020). A research synthesis of the real value of self-proclaimed mobile educational applications for young children. Mobile learning applications in early childhood education, 1-19.

Sarrab, M., Elgamel, L., & Aldabbas, H. (2012). Mobile learning (m-learning) and educational environments. International journal of distributed and parallel systems, 3(4), 31.

Shahbaz, M., & Khan, R. M. I. (2017). Use of mobile immersion in foreign language teaching to enhance target language vocabulary learning. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends & Practices, 66-82.

Stockwell, G. (2010). Using mobile phones for vocabulary activities: Examining the effect of platform. Language learning & technology, 14(2), 95-110.

Taj, I. H., Ali, F., Sipra, M. A., & Ahmad, W. (2017). Effect of technology enhanced language learning on EFL reading comprehension at tertiary level.

Tetnowski, J. A., & Damico, J. S. (2001). A demonstration of the advantages of qualitative methodologies in stuttering research. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 26(1), 17-42.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-06

How to Cite

Khan, R. M. I., Alahmadi, A., Radzuan , N. R. M., & Shahbaz, M. (2024). A Qualitative Analysis of WhatsApp Integration on Speaking Vocabulary Development . Register Journal, 17(1), 146–163. https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v17i1.146-163