Nurturing Heutagogy: Implementing Montessori Philosophy in English Language Acquisition within an Islamic School Context

Authors

  • Megan Jinabe Language Education Sciences, Faculty of Languages, Arts, and Cultures, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
  • Margana Margana Language Education Sciences, Faculty of Languages, Arts, and Cultures, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
  • Sukarno Sukarno Language Education Sciences, Faculty of Languages, Arts, and Cultures, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
  • Sugirin Sugirin Language Education Sciences, Faculty of Languages, Arts, and Cultures, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v18i2.260-285

Keywords:

Heutagogy, Islamic Montessori, Language Acquisition, Self-Directed Learning, Teaching English for Young Learners

Abstract

The Montessori method has become a trend in Early Childhood Education, particularly in terms of the students’ language acquisition within the Self-Directed Learning (SDL) framework. While SDL, as proposed in heutagogy, is theoretically ideal for language learning, practical implementations in a faith-based culture are not well understood. Therefore, this research analyses the teaching of the English language in a new educational context: a Montessori classroom in Indonesia that incorporates Islamic principles. Utilizing a qualitative case study approach, this research identifies the synergistic conditions that foster language development and describes the observable pathways of language acquisition within this context. Evidence gathered from classroom observations and teacher interviews identified three pillars that underpin success in this particular classroom environment: (1) radical autonomy, which offers personally meaningful language input; (2) a low anxiety classroom, which encourages spontaneous language production; and (3) a synergistic Islamic classroom environment, which strengthens self-discipline and independence in contrast to the Islamic faith. A specific four-stage sequence of acquisition was identified within this meticulously designed environment. The integration of Islamic character-building with Montessori pedagogy underscores the holistic development of the child and the language itself. This research adds value by addressing pedagogical needs at the cultural level, and, in doing so, establishes a conceptual framework that outlines the stepwise progression of learners within a framework of self-determination.

References

Akyol, A., et al. (2023). Montessori practices in early childhood education with teachers' experiences. Research in Pedagogy, 13(1), 177-192. https://doi.org/10.5937/istrped2301177a

Ali, S. and Weir, D. (2020). wasta: advancing a holistic model to bridge the micro-macro divide. Management and Organization Review, 16(3), 657-685. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2020.27

Aprilia, P., Romadhon, M., Fikri, D., & Mustofa, M. (2023). Strategies and challenges in interdisciplinary english language teaching at the preschool level: a qualitative analysis. Veles Voice of English Language Education Society, 7(3), 652-664. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v7i3.24566

Atlı, S., Korkmaz, A., Taştepe, T., & Akyol, A. (2016). Views on montessori approach by teachers serving at schools applying the montessori approach. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 16(66), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.66.7

Baird, G., Dworzynski, K., Slonims, V., & Simonoff, E. (2010). Memory impairment in children with language impairment. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 52(6), 535-540. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03494.x

Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning.

Brush, S., et al. (2018). Person-centered, skilled services using a Montessori approach for persons with dementia. Seminars in Speech and Language, 39(1), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1660781

Campanelli, C. (2023). Book review the bloomsbury handbook of montessori education. Journal of Montessori Research, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v9i1.20237

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.

Duckworth, A. L. (2016). Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. New York: Random House Publishing Group.

Elkhafaifi, H. (2005). Listening comprehension and anxiety in the Arabic language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 89(2), 174-186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00275.x

Foushee, R., Srinivasan, M., & Xu, F. (2023). Active learning in language development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 32(3), 250-257. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221123920

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Basic Books.

Gelir, İ. (2021). Learning english as a second language through translanguaging in early years. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.17984/adyuebd.700458

Gerker, H. (2023). Making sense of montessori teacher identity, montessori pedagogy, and educational policies in public schools. Journal of Montessori Research, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v9i1.18861

Gormley, W. T., et al. (2005). The effects of universal pre-K on cognitive development: A randomized trial. Developmental Psychology, 41(6), 872-884. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.6.872

Guo, Y. (2023). Childrens cognitive development: early language learning. Communications in Humanities Research, 3(1), 925-929. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/3/20221007

Hanafi, H. and Adwitiya, A. (2022). English language anxiety. International Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 351-357. https://doi.org/10.32528/issh.v2i1.213

Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2000). From Andragogy to Heutagogy: ImplicatIons for VET.

Hoff, E. (2017). How bilingual development is the same as and different from monolingual development. Olbi Journal, 8. https://doi.org/10.18192/olbiwp.v8i0.2114

Horwitz, E. K. (2010). Foreign and second language anxiety. Language Teaching, 43(2), 154-167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480999036X

Juliastuti, Thayyib, M., & Haerazi, H. (2023). Intercultural Communicative Competence Model Using English Literature: A Case Study at Some Islamic Universities in Indonesia. Register Journal, 16(1), 112–138. https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v16i1.112-138

Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Association Press.

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.

Kyuchukov, H. (2024). Learnability theory and rural roma children’s knowledge of languages: an empirical psycholinguistic comparative study. Psycholinguistics, 35(1), 108-133. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2024-35-1-108-133

Liliard, A. S. (2005). Montessori: The science behind the genius. Oxford University Press.

Liliard, P. (1972). Montessori: A modern approach. Shocken Books.

Lillard, A. and McHugh, V. (2019). Authentic montessori: the dottoressa’s view at the end of her life part i. Journal of Montessori Research, 5(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v5i1.7716

Lillard, A., Heise, M., Richey, E., Tong, X., Hart, A., & Bray, P. (2017). Montessori preschool elevates and equalizes child outcomes: a longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01783

Lin, Z. (2023). Analyzing the effects of second language acquisition on children’s cognitive development. SHS Web of Conferences, 180, 02021. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202318002021

Marshall, C. (2017). Montessori education: A review of the evidence base. npj Science of Learning, 2, Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-017-0012-7

Gumiandari, S., Nafi’a, I., & Jamaluddin, D. (2019). Criticizing montessori’s method of early childhood education using islamic psychology perspective. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(2), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v5i2.5835

Montessori, M, and George, A. E (Ed.), (2012). The Montessori method. Project Gutenberg.

Montessori, M. (1915). My system of education. The House of Childhood.

Montessori, M. (1949). The absorbent mind. The Theosophical Publishing House. Montessori, M. (2007). L’enfant dans la famille. Desclee de Bouwer.

Montessori, M. (1964). The Montessori method. Schocken Books.

Mutmainna, N., et al. (2024). A comparative study of Montessori and traditional education approaches: Cognitive development and academic achievement. International Education Trend Issues, 2(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.56442/ieti.v2i2.697

Newman, K., & Archer, E. (2024). Maria Montessori and the mystery of language acquisition. Journal of Montessori Research, 10(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v10i1.21686

Pablo, Z., London, K., Wong, P., & Khalfan, M. (2021). Actor-network theory and the evolution of complex adaptive supply networks. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 668-684. https://doi.org/10.1108/ci-05-2019-0042

Pattiruhu, C., Makulua, K., Thalib, N., Elizar, E., & Pandia, B. (2023). Integrative holistic learning strategies in early childhood education. Al-Hijr Journal of Adulearn World, 2(4), 329-349. https://doi.org/10.55849/alhijr.v2i1.549

Pichette, F. (2009). Second language anxiety and distance language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 42(2), 238-254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01009.x

Purwaningrum, A. Y., Lengkanawati, N. S., & Yusuf, F. N. (2024). Examining Mobile-assisted Language Learning as an Autonomous Writing Tool for Indonesian Secondary EFL Students . Register Journal, 17(2), 328–351. https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v17i2.328-351

Ramadahn, A. (2023). The implementation of the montessori method in building learning motivation in low elementary at brainy bunch international islamic montessori school, malaysia. At-Thullab Jurnal Mahasiswa Studi Islam, 5(2), 156-166. https://doi.org/10.20885/tullab.vol5.iss2.art15

Saville‐Troike, M. (2012). Introducing second language acquisition.. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511888830

Sierens, S., Slembrouck, S., Gorp, K., Ağırdağ, O., & Avermaet, P. (2019). Linguistic interdependence of receptive vocabulary skills in emergent bilingual preschool children: exploring a factor-dependent approach. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(05), 1269-1297. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716419000250

Supriadi, S., Rozelin, D., Muhaimin, M., & Fauzan, U. (2024). The Implementation of Autonomous Learning through Multimedia Oral Presentation to Develop Students’ Language Skills. Register Journal, 17(2), 301–327. https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v17i2.301-327

Sutrisno, L., Widodo, S., Sudardi, B., & Warto, W. (2020). Javanese cross-gender: the three domains of cabaret show in yogyakarta city.. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.20-9-2019.2297042

Tomasello, M. (2001). First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(1-2), 61-82. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2001.012

Walls, J. (2018). To what extent do parents of montessori-educated children “do montessori” at home? preliminary findings and future directions. Journal of Montessori Research, 4(1), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v4i1.6737

Whitescarver, K. and Cossentino, J. (2008). Montessori and the mainstream: a century of reform on the margins. Teachers College Record, 110(12), 2571-2600. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810811001202

Xiao-li, L., Su, N., Lu, Y., & Hong-li, L. (2023). Montessori educational thought and its implications for family education. Applied & Educational Psychology, 4(8). https://doi.org/10.23977/appep.2023.040801

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Zein, S., Sukyadi, D., Hamied, F., & Lengkanawati, N. (2020). English language education in indonesia: a review of research (2011–2019). Language Teaching, 53(4), 491-523. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444820000208

Zhou, Y., et al. (2021). Research trends and hotspots on Montessori intervention in patients with dementia. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, Article 737270. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.737270

Wijaya, K., Wijaya, R., Huwaida, J., & Rochmat, C. (2024). Thematic learning in the independent curriculum in elementary schools based on the islamic montessori method for multiple intelligence. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 7(1), 85-97. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v7i1.66794

Downloads

Published

2025-12-01

How to Cite

Jinabe, M., Margana, M., Sukarno, S., & Sugirin, S. (2025). Nurturing Heutagogy: Implementing Montessori Philosophy in English Language Acquisition within an Islamic School Context. Register Journal, 18(2), 260–285. https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v18i2.260-285

Most read articles by the same author(s)