Exploring Qualities that Prevent EFL Teachers from Redundancy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v16i1.95-111

Keywords:

Online teaching and learning, mobile technology, teachers’ roles, redundancy

Abstract

The practice of English language teaching has dramatically changed with the existence of Internet-based learning platforms. The educational technology provides EFL students with a variety of language learning materials that can be accessed at any time and anywhere. These phenomena might threaten the teacher's existence. Thus, this study aims to figure out whether or not EFL teachers’ roles can be replaced by technology and to explore what qualities they should possess and maintain to prevent them from redundancy due to the domination of mobile-based language learning applications. A mix-method design was utilized to obtain the quantitative data through an online survey and qualitative data through an open-ended question. 199 EFL learners participated in the online survey, which consisted of a yes/no question on whether teachers could be replaced by mobile apps and an open-ended question to record the reasons. The findings showed that 132 students (66.3%) thought that teachers could not be replaced by mobile technology; meanwhile, around one-third of the respondents, 67 students (33.7%) had the opposing thought. The students still require human interaction, a sense of emotion, and delivery over the mobile tech features that could provide availability, flexibility, and practicality. It is highly recommended that English teachers maintain their humane qualities while keep adapting to technology to save themselves from redundancy.

Author Biographies

I Dewa Gede Rat Dwiyana Putra, Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar

I Dewa Gede Rat Dwiyana Putra is a faculty member of the English Language Education Department of Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. He earned his Doctoral Degree in English Language Education from Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia. His research interest includes ICT and writing.

Sayit Abdul Karim, Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta

Sayit Abdul Karim is a faculty member of the English Education Department of Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta, Indonesia. He received his master’s from Universitas Negeri Semarang, and Ph.D. from Universitas Negeri Malang. He was a visiting scholar at the Auckland University of Technology (AUT), New Zealand. His research interests mainly focus on TEFL, Teacher Professional Development, Sociolinguistics, and English for Specific Purposes.

Iswandany Kaslan, Universitas Islam Negeri Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi

Iswandany Kaslan is a faculty member of English Education Study Program, the Graduate School of the State Islamic University of Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin, Jambi. He earned his Doctor degree from Malang State University, Malang, East Java, Indonesia. His research interests include the areas of Language Proficiency and Curriculum Development.

References

Ambarwati, R., & Mandasari, B. (2020). the Influence of Online Cambridge Dictionary Toward Students’ Pronunciation and Vocabulary Mastery. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.33365/jeltl.v1i2.605

Amhag, L., Hellström, L., & Stigmar, M. (2019). Teacher Educators’ Use of Digital Tools and Needs for Digital Competence in Higher Education. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(4), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1646169

Anugerahwati, M., & Saukah, A. (2010). Professional Competence of English Teachers in Indonesia : a Profile of Exemplary Teachers. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(2), 107–119.

Avidov Ungar, O., & Forkosh Baruch, A. (2016). Perceptions of Teacher Educators Regarding ICT Implementation in Israeli Colleges of Education. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Skills and Lifelong Learning, 12, 279–296. https://doi.org/10.28945/3606

Barnes, B. D., & Lock, G. (2010). The attributes of effective lecturers of english as a foreign language as perceived by students in a Korean university. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2010v35n1.2

Baroud, J., & Dharamshi, P. (2020). A Collaborative Self Study of Critical Digital Pedagogies in Teacher Education. Studying Teacher Education, 16(2), 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2020.1739639

Carmel, R., & Badash, M. (2019). Who is the effective teacher? Perceptions of early career English teachers in Israel. The Language Learning Journal, 49(5), 614–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1656767

Carrillo, F. A. G. (2012a). Can Technology Completely Replace Human Interaction in Class? World Journal on Educational Technology, 4(3), 153–164. http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=psyc9&NEWS=N&AN=2013-34488-002

Carrillo, F. A. G. (2012b). Can Technology Replace the Teacher in the Pedagogical Relationship with the Student? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5646–5655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.490

Collinson, V. (2001). Intellectual, Social, and Moral Development: Why Technology Cannot Replace Teachers. The High School Journal, 85(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2001.0015

Djiwandono, P. I. (2019). How Language Teachers Perceive Information and Communication Technology. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(3), 608–616. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i3.15260

Faranda, W.T., & Clarke, I. 2004. Students Observations of Outstanding

teaching: Implications for marketing educators. Journal of Marketing

Education, 26 (3), 271-281.

Garcia, A., Kelly, M. R., & Stamatis, K. (2020). When Technology Goes Unnoticed: Teacher Beliefs and Assumptions About Technology Use in Three 9th Grade English Classrooms. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 17(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2020.1781638

Hager, K. D. (2020). Integrating Technology to Improve Teacher Preparation. College Teaching, 68(2), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2020.1723475

Hartman, R. J., Townsend, M. B., & Jackson, M. (2019). Educators’ perceptions of technology integration into the classroom: a descriptive case study. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning, 12(3), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-03-2019-0044

Helleve, I., Grov Almås, A., & Bjørkelo, B. (2019). Becoming a Professional Digital Competent Teacher. Professional Development in Education, 46(2), 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1585381

Karim, S. A., Sulistyo, G. H., Sri Rachmajanti, & Suryati, N. (2020). Exploring EFL teachers’ beliefs about English language learning and teaching: Evidence from Indonesia context. Asian EFL Journal, 27(2), 227–246.

Koç, E. M. (2013). Affective Characteristics and Teaching Skills of English Language Teachers: Comparing Perceptions of Elementary, Secondary and High School Students. Creative Education, 04(02), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.42017

Kolchenko, V. (2018). Can Modern AI Replace Teachers? Not So Fast! Artificial Intelligence and Adaptive Learning: Personalized Education in the AI Age. HAPS Educator, 22(3), 249–252. https://doi.org/10.21692/haps.2018.032

Mali, Y. C. G. (2022). Teaching reflection of using technology in two Indonesian EFL classrooms: an autoethnography. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 12(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v12i1.2860

McKenney, S., & Visscher, A. J. (2019). Technology for teacher learning and performance. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1600859

Mollaei, F., & Riasati, M. J. (2013). Teachers’ Perceptions of Using Technology in Teaching EFL. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 2(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.2n.1p.13

Park, G. P., & Lee, H. W. (2006). The characteristics of effective English teachers as perceived by high school teachers and students in Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7(2), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031547

Prayudi, R. A., Hakiki, A. K., Putra, N. R. D., Anzka, T. O., & Ihsan, M. T. (2021). the Use of Technology in English Teaching & Learning Process. Jurnal Riset Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran, 1(2), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.51574/jrip.v1i2.38

Puspita, D, I. 2013. Students and Teachers' Perceptions about Characteristics of Good English Teachers of Seniot High Schools in Madiun. Unpublished Thesis. Malang: PPS UM.

Richards, J. C. (2010). Competence and performance in language teaching. RELC Journal, 41(2), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688210372953

Russell, M., Bebell, D., O’Dwyer, L., & O’Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487103255985

Sankar, S. V. G., & Aruna, Y. (2020). Can CALL or TELL Replace Teachers. Easy Chair Preprint 2311, 6. https://easychair.org/publications/preprint_download/mNrv

Shahneaz, M., Akhter, S., & Yasmin, N. (2014). The Impact of Teacher and Technology in Class Room. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(27), 79–83. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234636307.pdf

Tanjung, F. Z. (2020). Teachers’ Views on the Integration of Technology in Efl Classroom. IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching), 4(2), 208–215. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet.v4i2.2344

Downloads

Published

2023-04-26

How to Cite

Dwiyana Putra, I. D. G. R., Karim, S. A., & Kaslan, I. (2023). Exploring Qualities that Prevent EFL Teachers from Redundancy. Register Journal, 16(1), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v16i1.95-111