Exploring Qualities that Prevent EFL Teachers from Redundancy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v16i1.95-111Keywords:
Online teaching and learning, mobile technology, teachers’ roles, redundancyAbstract
The practice of English language teaching has dramatically changed with the existence of Internet-based learning platforms. The educational technology provides EFL students with a variety of language learning materials that can be accessed at any time and anywhere. These phenomena might threaten the teacher's existence. Thus, this study aims to figure out whether or not EFL teachers’ roles can be replaced by technology and to explore what qualities they should possess and maintain to prevent them from redundancy due to the domination of mobile-based language learning applications. A mix-method design was utilized to obtain the quantitative data through an online survey and qualitative data through an open-ended question. 199 EFL learners participated in the online survey, which consisted of a yes/no question on whether teachers could be replaced by mobile apps and an open-ended question to record the reasons. The findings showed that 132 students (66.3%) thought that teachers could not be replaced by mobile technology; meanwhile, around one-third of the respondents, 67 students (33.7%) had the opposing thought. The students still require human interaction, a sense of emotion, and delivery over the mobile tech features that could provide availability, flexibility, and practicality. It is highly recommended that English teachers maintain their humane qualities while keep adapting to technology to save themselves from redundancy.
References
Ambarwati, R., & Mandasari, B. (2020). the Influence of Online Cambridge Dictionary Toward Students’ Pronunciation and Vocabulary Mastery. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.33365/jeltl.v1i2.605
Amhag, L., Hellström, L., & Stigmar, M. (2019). Teacher Educators’ Use of Digital Tools and Needs for Digital Competence in Higher Education. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(4), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1646169
Anugerahwati, M., & Saukah, A. (2010). Professional Competence of English Teachers in Indonesia : a Profile of Exemplary Teachers. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(2), 107–119.
Avidov Ungar, O., & Forkosh Baruch, A. (2016). Perceptions of Teacher Educators Regarding ICT Implementation in Israeli Colleges of Education. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Skills and Lifelong Learning, 12, 279–296. https://doi.org/10.28945/3606
Barnes, B. D., & Lock, G. (2010). The attributes of effective lecturers of english as a foreign language as perceived by students in a Korean university. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2010v35n1.2
Baroud, J., & Dharamshi, P. (2020). A Collaborative Self Study of Critical Digital Pedagogies in Teacher Education. Studying Teacher Education, 16(2), 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2020.1739639
Carmel, R., & Badash, M. (2019). Who is the effective teacher? Perceptions of early career English teachers in Israel. The Language Learning Journal, 49(5), 614–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1656767
Carrillo, F. A. G. (2012a). Can Technology Completely Replace Human Interaction in Class? World Journal on Educational Technology, 4(3), 153–164. http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=psyc9&NEWS=N&AN=2013-34488-002
Carrillo, F. A. G. (2012b). Can Technology Replace the Teacher in the Pedagogical Relationship with the Student? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5646–5655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.490
Collinson, V. (2001). Intellectual, Social, and Moral Development: Why Technology Cannot Replace Teachers. The High School Journal, 85(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2001.0015
Djiwandono, P. I. (2019). How Language Teachers Perceive Information and Communication Technology. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(3), 608–616. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i3.15260
Faranda, W.T., & Clarke, I. 2004. Students Observations of Outstanding
teaching: Implications for marketing educators. Journal of Marketing
Education, 26 (3), 271-281.
Garcia, A., Kelly, M. R., & Stamatis, K. (2020). When Technology Goes Unnoticed: Teacher Beliefs and Assumptions About Technology Use in Three 9th Grade English Classrooms. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 17(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2020.1781638
Hager, K. D. (2020). Integrating Technology to Improve Teacher Preparation. College Teaching, 68(2), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2020.1723475
Hartman, R. J., Townsend, M. B., & Jackson, M. (2019). Educators’ perceptions of technology integration into the classroom: a descriptive case study. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning, 12(3), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-03-2019-0044
Helleve, I., Grov Almås, A., & Bjørkelo, B. (2019). Becoming a Professional Digital Competent Teacher. Professional Development in Education, 46(2), 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1585381
Karim, S. A., Sulistyo, G. H., Sri Rachmajanti, & Suryati, N. (2020). Exploring EFL teachers’ beliefs about English language learning and teaching: Evidence from Indonesia context. Asian EFL Journal, 27(2), 227–246.
Koç, E. M. (2013). Affective Characteristics and Teaching Skills of English Language Teachers: Comparing Perceptions of Elementary, Secondary and High School Students. Creative Education, 04(02), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.42017
Kolchenko, V. (2018). Can Modern AI Replace Teachers? Not So Fast! Artificial Intelligence and Adaptive Learning: Personalized Education in the AI Age. HAPS Educator, 22(3), 249–252. https://doi.org/10.21692/haps.2018.032
Mali, Y. C. G. (2022). Teaching reflection of using technology in two Indonesian EFL classrooms: an autoethnography. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 12(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v12i1.2860
McKenney, S., & Visscher, A. J. (2019). Technology for teacher learning and performance. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1600859
Mollaei, F., & Riasati, M. J. (2013). Teachers’ Perceptions of Using Technology in Teaching EFL. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 2(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.2n.1p.13
Park, G. P., & Lee, H. W. (2006). The characteristics of effective English teachers as perceived by high school teachers and students in Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7(2), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031547
Prayudi, R. A., Hakiki, A. K., Putra, N. R. D., Anzka, T. O., & Ihsan, M. T. (2021). the Use of Technology in English Teaching & Learning Process. Jurnal Riset Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran, 1(2), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.51574/jrip.v1i2.38
Puspita, D, I. 2013. Students and Teachers' Perceptions about Characteristics of Good English Teachers of Seniot High Schools in Madiun. Unpublished Thesis. Malang: PPS UM.
Richards, J. C. (2010). Competence and performance in language teaching. RELC Journal, 41(2), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688210372953
Russell, M., Bebell, D., O’Dwyer, L., & O’Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487103255985
Sankar, S. V. G., & Aruna, Y. (2020). Can CALL or TELL Replace Teachers. Easy Chair Preprint 2311, 6. https://easychair.org/publications/preprint_download/mNrv
Shahneaz, M., Akhter, S., & Yasmin, N. (2014). The Impact of Teacher and Technology in Class Room. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(27), 79–83. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234636307.pdf
Tanjung, F. Z. (2020). Teachers’ Views on the Integration of Technology in Efl Classroom. IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching), 4(2), 208–215. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet.v4i2.2344
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sayit Karim, I Dewa Gede Rat Dwiyana Putra, Iswandany Kaslan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
REGISTER JOURNAL: https://ejournal.uinsalatiga.ac.id/index.php/register/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Copyright Notice
An author who publishes in REGISTER JOURNAL agrees to the following terms:
- The author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- The author can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.
Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal. They will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.