A Corpus-Based Lexical Coverage of Coursebooks in Nigeria: A Case Study

Authors

  • Hamisu Hamisu Haruna Department of English, College of Humanities, Al-Qalam University Katsina - Nigeria
  • Azza Jauhar Ahmad Tajuddin English Language Learning Center, Center of Fundamental and Continuing Education, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu– Malaysia
  • Ibrahim Bashir Department of English, Northern Private College of Nursing, Arar – Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v17i1.164-188

Keywords:

Vocabulary, lexical coverage, lexical profile, lexical load, ESL

Abstract

Since vocabulary is one of the most important components of reading comprehension, the relationship between the two has been studied in great detail. The significance of this relationship lies in the fact that learners' vocabulary size and the degree of coverage of the word families of the intended content are closely correlated with their ability to understand the context and the text. This study examined the lexical coverage of a corpus of 6,802,300 words from the first-year course books of the National Open University of Nigeria. With Anthony's AntWordProfiler software, we analyzed the lexical coverage of the corpus using the Lexical Frequency Profiling approach. The current study used Nation's (2012) BNC/COCA to determine the necessary vocabulary size for course book comprehension. The corpus study revealed that in order to reach 95% and 98% of the entire course book corpus, respectively, 5000 and 11000 word-families were required. However, vocabulary size needed for comprehension of each disciplinary field varied greatly, with the hard sciences having a significantly higher lexical demand as compared to the other fields. This means that students need a larger vocabulary to interact with and understand the course books, especially in the hard sciences. It therefore recommended that materials writers and instructors consider the specific disciplinary vocabulary needs in course books.  Similarly, due to disciplinary differences, more specific instructions and glossaries are needed for first-year university students to have a better understanding of course books, especially hard science course books. The study demonstrated the significance of corpus-based approaches in the analysis of language learning materials. Overall, the study underlined the importance of sufficient vocabulary for reading comprehension.

References

Anthony, L. (2021). AntWordProfiler (Version 1.5.1) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software.

Arndt, R. (2022). Vocabulary in Digital Science Resources for Middle School Learners. Applied Corpus Linguistics, 2(3), 100023.

Barnbrook, G. (1996). Language and Computers: A Practical Introduction to the Computer Analysis of Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Benson, S. (2020). Dot The Pill Down: Investigating the Linguistic Needs of Foreign Rugby Players and Lexicon of Spoken Rugby Discourse. PhD Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington.

Benson, S., & Coxhead, A. (2022). Technical Single and Multiword Unit Vocabulary in Spoken Rugby Discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 66, 111-130.

Bratić, V., & Stamatović, M. V. (2021). Lexical Profile of Literary Academic Articles. Ibérica, (42), 115-138.

Chen, Q., & Ge, G.-C. (2007). A Corpus-Based Lexical Study on Frequency and Distribution of Coxhead’s AWL Word Families in Medical Research Articles (RAs). English for Specific Purposes, 26(4), 502–514.

Coxhead A (2017) Academic Vocabulary in Teacher Talk: Challenges and Opportunities for Pedagogy. Oslo Studies in Language, 9, 29–44.

Coxhead, A., Dang, T. N. Y., & Mukai, S. (2017). Single and Multi-Word Unit Vocabulary in University Tutorials and Laboratories: Evidence from Corpora and Textbooks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 30, 66-78.

Coxhead, A., & Boutorwick, T. J. (2018). Longitudinal Vocabulary Development in an EMI International School Context: Learners and Texts in EAL, Maths, and Science. tesol Quarterly, 52(3), 588-610.

Daller, H., Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2007). Editors’ Introduction: Conventions, Terminology and an Overview of the Book. In H. Daller, J. Milton, & J. TreffersDaller (Eds.), Modelling and Assessing Vocabulary Knowledge (pp. 1–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dang, T.N.Y., Webb, S., (2014). The Lexical Profile of Academic Spoken English. English for Specific Purposes 33, 66–76. doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2013.08.001.

Dang, T. N. Y., Coxhead, A., & Webb, S. (2017). The Academic Spoken Word List. Language Learning, 67(4), 959-997.

Dang, T. N. Y. (2018a). A Hard Science Spoken Word List. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 169(1), 44-71.

Dang, T. N. Y. (2018b). The Nature of Vocabulary in Academic Speech of Hard and Soft-Sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 51, 69-83.

Dang, T. N. Y. (2019). The Potential for Learning Specialized Vocabulary of University Lectures and Seminars through Watching Discipline-Related TV Programs: Insights from Medical Corpora. TESOL Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.552.

Dang, T. (2020). Corpus-Based Word Lists in Second Language Vocabulary Research, Learning, and Teaching. In S. Webb (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Vocabulary Studies (pp. 288-304). New York: Routledge.

Dang, T. N. Y., Webb, S., & Coxhead, A. (2022). Evaluating Lists of High-Frequency Words: Teachers’ and Learners’ Perspectives. Language Teaching Research, 26(4), 617-641.

El Morabit, A. (2020). Evaluating the Lexical Load of the Reading Comprehension Texts in EFL Textbooks. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 1(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlts.v1i1.15.

Eldridge, J., & Neufeld, S. (2009). The Graded Reader is Dead, Long Live the Electronic Reader. The Reading Matrix, 9(2), 224-244.

Ha, A. Y. H., & Hyland, K. (2017). What is Technicality? A Technicality Analysis Model for EAP Vocabulary. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 28, 35-49.

Haruna, H. H., Ibrahim, B., Haruna, M., Ibrahim, B., & Yunus, K. (2018). Metadiscourse in Students’ Academic Writing: Case Study of Umaru Musa Yar’adua University and Al-Qalam University Katsina. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(7), 83-92.

Hsu, W. (2014). Measuring the Vocabulary Load of Engineering Textbooks for EFL Undergraduates. English for Specific Purposes, 33, 54-65.

Hu, M. & Nation, I. S. P. (2000). Vocabulary Density and Reading Comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13(1), 403–30.

Ibrahim, B., Haruna, H. H., Bashir, I., & Yunus, K. (2018). The Usage of Spatial Prepositions in the Headlines of Major Nigerian Newspapers. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(7), 13-22.

Janebi Enayat, M., & Derakhshan, A. (2021). Vocabulary Size and Depth as Predictors of Second Language Speaking Ability. System, 99, 102521. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2021.102521.

Jordan, G., & Gray, H. (2019). We Need to Talk about Coursebooks. ELT journal, 73(4), 438-446.

Laufer, B. and Nation, P. (1995). Lexical Richness in L2 Written Production: Can it be Measured? Applied Linguistics, 16 (3), 307-322.

Laufer, B., & Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G. C. (2010). Lexical Threshold Revisited: Lexical Text Coverage, Learners’ Vocabulary Size and Reading Comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 15–30.

Laufer, B. (2013). Lexical Thresholds for Reading Comprehension: What They are and How They Can Be Used for Teaching Purposes. TESOL Quarterly, 47(4), 867–872.

Laufer, B. (2020). Lexical Coverages, Inferencing Unknown Words and Reading Comprehension: How Are They Related? TESOL Quarterly, 54(4), 1076–1085.

Laufer, B., Webb, S., Kim, S. K., & Yohanan, B. (2021). How Well Do Learners Know Derived Words in a Second Language? The Effect of Proficiency, Word Frequency and Type of Affix. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 172(2), 229-258.

Lindqvist, C., Anna & Camilla, B. (2013). A New Approach to Measuring Lexical Sophistication in L2 Oral Production. In L2 Vocabulary Acquisition, Knowledge and Use: New Perspectives on Assessment and Corpus Analysis, edited by Camilla Bardel, Christina Lindqvist, and Batia Laufer, 109–26.

Lu, C., & Coxhead, A. (2020). Vocabulary in Traditional Chinese Medicine: Insights from Corpora. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 171(1), 34-61.

Macalister, J. (2016). Applying Language Learning Principles to Coursebooks. English Language Teaching Today: Linking Theory and Practice, 41-51.

McKinley, S., & Hastings, B. (2007). Longman English Success. New Jersey: Pearson Longman.

Miralpeix, I., & Muñoz, C.P. (2018). Receptive Vocabulary Size and its Relationship to EFL Language Skills. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 56, (1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0016.

Nation, I.S.P., (2001). Using Small Corpora to Investigate Learner Needs: Two Vocabulary Re-Search Tools. In: Ghadessy, M, Henry, A., Roseberry, R.L. (Eds.), Small Corpus Studies and ELT. John Benjamins Publishing, pp. 31–46.

Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How Large a Vocabulary is Needed for Reading and Listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59-82.

Nation, I. S. P. (2011). Research into Practice: Vocabulary Language Teaching, 44(4), 529-539.

Nation, I. S. P. (2012). The BNC/COCA Word Family Lists. Retrieved from http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/about/staff/paul-nation.

Nation, I. S. (2013). Teaching & Learning Vocabulary. Boston: Heinle Cengage Learning.

Nation, I. S. P. (2016). Making and Using Word Lists for Language Learning and Testing. Making and Using Word Lists for Language Learning and Testing, 1-224.

Ng, Y. J., Chong, S. T., Thiruchelvam, S., Chow, M. F., & Karthikeyan, J. (2020). Vocabulary Threshold for the Comprehension of Malaysian Secondary Engineering Texts as Compared to the Non-Engineering Genres. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 14(1), 488-504.

Nguyen C-D (2020). Lexical Features of Reading Passages in English-Language Textbooks for Vietnamese High-School Students: Do They Foster Both Content and Vocabulary Gain? RELC Journal. DOI: 10.1177/0033688219895045

Nurmukhamedov, U., & Webb, S. (2019). Research Timeline: Lexical Coverage and Profiling. Language Teaching, 52(2), 188–200.

O’Loughlin, R. (2012). Tuning into Vocabulary Frequency in Coursebooks. RELC Journal, 43(2), 255-269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212450640.

Phung, D. H., & Ha, H. T. (2022). Vocabulary Demands of the IELTS Listening Test: An In-Depth Analysis. Sage Open, 12(1), 21582440221079934.

Rabadi, R. I. (2023). Examining the Role of Breadth and Depth of Vocabulary Knowledge in Reading Comprehension of English Language Learners. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures Vol, 15(1), 327-345.

Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., Grabe, W., (2011). The Percentage of Words Known in a Text and Reading Comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 95 (1), 26–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01146.x.

Schmitt, N., Cobb, T., Horst, M., & Schmitt, D. (2017). How Much Vocabulary is Needed to Use English? Replication of van Zeeland & Schmitt (2012), Nation (2006) and Cobb (2007). Language Teaching, 50(2), 212–226.

Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation: Describing English Language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Stæhr, L. S. (2008). Vocabulary Size and the Skills of Listening, Reading and Writing. The Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730802389975.

Stamatović, M. V., Bratić, V., & Lakić, I. (2020). Vocabulary of L1 and L2 Graduation Theses Written by English Philology Students: Academic Writing of Montenegrin and US Students Compared. ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, 17(2), 101-113.

Sun, Y., & Dang, T. N. Y. (2020). Vocabulary in High-School EFL Textbooks: Texts and Learner Knowledge. System, 93, 102279.

Tegge, F. (2017). The Lexical Coverage of Popular Songs in English Language Teaching. System, 67, 87-98.

Valipouri, L., & Nassaji, H. (2013). A Corpus-Based Study of Academic Vocabulary in Chemistry Research Articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(4), 248-263.

Van Zeeland, H., & Schmitt, N. (2013). Lexical Coverage in L1 and L2 Listening Comprehension: The Same or Different from Reading Comprehension? Applied linguistics, 34(4), 457-479.

Vuković-Stamatović, M. (2020). Vocabulary Complexity and Reading and Listening Comprehension of Various Physics Genres. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 16(3), 487-514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2019-0022.

Webb, S., & Rodgers, M. P. H. (2009a). The Lexical Coverage of Movies. Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 407–427.

Webb, S. & Rodgers, M. P. H. (2009b). Vocabulary Demands of Television Programs. Language Learning, 59(2), 335–366.

Webb, S., & Nation, I.S.P. (2012). Computer-Assisted Vocabulary Load Analysis. In C.A. Chapelle (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, (pp. 1–10). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0179.

Webb, S., Macalister, J., (2013). Is Text Written for Children Useful for L2 Extensive Reading? TESOL Quarterly, 47 (2), 300–322.

Webb, S., & Paribakht, T.S. (2015). What is the Relationship between the Lexical Profile of Test Items and Performance on a Standardized English Proficiency Test. English for Specific Purposes, 38, 34–43.

Webb, S., & Nation, I. S. P. (2017). How Vocabulary is Learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Webb, S. (2021). Research Investigating Lexical Coverage and Lexical Profiling: What We Know, What We Don't Know, and What Needs to be Examined. Reading in a Foreign Language, 33(2), 278-293.

West, M. (1953). A General Service List of English Words. Longman, Green: Longman.

Yang, L., & Coxhead, A. (2022). A Corpus-Based Study of Vocabulary in the New Concept English Textbook Series. RELC Journal, 53(3), 597-611.

Zhang, S., & Zhang, X. (2020). The Relationship between Vocabulary Knowledge and L2 Reading/Listening Comprehension: A Meta-Analysis. Language Teaching Research, 26(4), 696–725. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820913998.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-06

How to Cite

Haruna, H. H., Tajuddin, A. J. A., & Bashir, I. (2024). A Corpus-Based Lexical Coverage of Coursebooks in Nigeria: A Case Study. Register Journal, 17(1), 164–188. https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v17i1.164-188