Ethical Integration of Generative AI and Students’ Motivation in Academic Writing: An Exploratory Practice in an Islamic Higher Education Context

Authors

  • Reza Anggriyashati Adara Universitas Muhammadiyah Indonesia/UNISMA Bekasi
  • Irnie Victorynie Universitas Muhammadiyah Indonesia/UNISMA Bekasi
  • Istiqlaliah Nurul Hidayati Universitas Pakuan, Indonesia
  • Abdul Rosyid Universitas Pakuan, Indonesia
  • Poppy Sofia Hidayati Universitas Pakuan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v19i1.173-195

Keywords:

AI, Exploratory Practice, Islamic Higher Education, Motivation, Writing Skills.

Abstract

This study investigates the ethical integration of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its impact on students’ motivation and academic writing in an English for Academic Purposes (EAP) course at an Islamic higher education institution in Indonesia. The study conceptualizes Islamic values, particularly academic integrity, responsibility, and authorship, as essential competencies in second language academic writing. Forty undergraduate students were divided into experimental and control classes. In the experimental class, students collaboratively formulated classroom guidelines for responsible AI use through focus group discussions, which were implemented over seven sessions using an Exploratory Practice approach. Reflective essays written before and after AI integration were analyzed thematically, and writing performance was assessed using IELTS criteria. The findings indicate that generative AI supported surface-level writing skills such as grammar, vocabulary, and coherence; however, higher-order skills, including critical thinking, idea development, and appropriate use of references, declined when AI was employed without sufficient pedagogical guidance. Students reported increased efficiency alongside concerns about over-reliance, emphasizing that AI should function as a supportive tool rather than a substitute for individual effort. Comparisons with the control class show that conventional instruction led to steady improvement in writing, whereas AI integration produced mixed outcomes, highlighting the need for ethical guidance. The study demonstrates the importance of thoughtfully integrating AI in Islamic higher education to promote both academic proficiency and ethical responsibility, and it contributes to ELT research by linking Islamic academic values with responsible language learning and authorship practices.

References

Alberth. (2023). The use of ChatGPT in academic writing: A blessing of a curse in disguise? Teflin Journal, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v34i2/337-352

Alharbi, W. (2023). AI in the Foreign Language Classroom: A Pedagogical Overview of Automated Writing Assistance Tools. Education Research International, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4253331

Allwright, D., & Hanks, J. (2009). The developing language learner. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230233690

Braun, V. , & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners (1st ed., Vol. 1). Sage Publications.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Appropriate Criteria: Key to Effective Rubrics. Frontiers in Education, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00022

Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality and Quantity, 56(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y

Cahaya, C. (2024). Character education in Islamic higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning, 12(1), 1–12.

Carvalho, L., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Tsai, Y.-S., Markauskaite, L., & de Laat, M. (2022). How can we design for learning in an AI world? Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100053

Chamisah, C. (2025). Integrating Islamic values into English curriculum development: A descriptive qualitative literature review in State Islamic higher education. Journal of Education, Pedagogy and Teacher Training, 2(1), 1–11.

Chomsky, N., Roberts, I., & Watumull, J. (2023). Noam Chomsky: The False Promise of ChatGPT. The New York Times.

Civil, B. (2023, May 23). ChatGPT can hinder students’ critical thinking skills: Artificial intelligence is changing how students learn to write. The Queen’s Journal.

Daniel, K., Msambwa, M. M., & Wen, Z. (2025). Can Generative AI Revolutionise Academic Skills Development in Higher Education? A Systematic Literature Review. European Journal of Education, 60(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70036

Dipta, D., Muhammad, F. R., Fachriza, A., Nuraini, E. I., Virgiyanti, D. F., & Triwijayanti, A. Z. (2025). Unveiling the role of English for Academic Purposes in multilingual pesantren education: A needs analysis. At-Ta’dib, 20(1), 126–141.

Dizon, G., & Gayed, J. M. (2021). Examining The Impact Of Grammarly On The Quality Of Mobile L2 Writing. JALT CALL Journal, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.29140/JALTCALL.V17N2.336

Finchilescu, G., & Cooper, A. (2018). Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty in a South African University: A Q-Methodology Approach. Ethics & Behavior, 28(4), 284–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2017.1279972

Gumelar, R. E., & Jubaedah, D. (2025). The integration of Islamic educational values from the Qur’an and Hadith into English language teaching: A literature review. Journal of English Education Studies, 8(1), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.30653/005.202581.140

Haliq, A., Mahande, R. D., & Akhiruddin, A. (2025). Exploring the impact of critical thinking and digital literacy on students’ academic essay writing skills. Diksi, 33(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.21831/diksi.v33i2.88078

Hanks, J. (2015). Language teachers making sense of Exploratory Practice. Language Teaching Research, 19(5), 612–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814567805

Hellmich, E., & Vinall, K. (2021). FL Instructor Beliefs About Machine Translation. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 11(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.2021100101

IELTS. (2023, May 1). Writing band descriptors. IELTS.ORG.

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. In Learning and Individual Differences (Vol. 103). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Kohnke, L. (2024). Exploring EAP students’ perceptions of GenAI and traditional grammar-checking tools for language learning. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100279

Liu, Z., & Yushchik, E. (2024). Exploring the prospects of using artificial intelligence in education. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2353464

Marzuki, M., Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469

Ngo, T. N., & Hastie, D. (2025). Artificial Intelligence for Academic Purposes (AIAP): Integrating AI literacy into an EAP module. English for Specific Purposes, 77, 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2024.09.001

Sinhaliz, S., Burdjaco, Z., & du Preez, J. (2023, February 22). How ChatGPT Could Revolutionize Academia. IEEE Spectrum.

Suhartini, S., & Fajri, M. (2025). The role of Islamic higher education in developing the character and ethics of Muslim students. International Conference on Education, Society and Humanity, 128–137.

Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic Analysis. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology (pp. 17–36). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526405555.n2

Vanclay, F., Baines, J. T., & Taylor, C. N. (2013). Principles for ethical research involving humans: Ethical professional practice in impact assessment Part I. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2013.850307

Vinall, K., & Hellmich, E. (2022). Do You Speak Translate?: Reflections on the Nature and Role of Translation. L2 Journal, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/l214156150

Warschauer, M., Tseng, W., Yim, S., Webster, T., Jacob, S., Du, Q., & Tate, T. (2023). The Affordances and Contradictions of AI-Generated Text for Second Language Writers. SSRN Electronic Journal, 62, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4404380

Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7

Zhai, X. (2022, December 27). ChatGPT User Experience: Implications for Education. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418

Downloads

Published

2026-05-22

How to Cite

Adara, R. A., Victorynie, I., Hidayati, I. N., Rosyid, A., & Hidayati, P. S. (2026). Ethical Integration of Generative AI and Students’ Motivation in Academic Writing: An Exploratory Practice in an Islamic Higher Education Context. Register Journal, 19(1), 173–195. https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v19i1.173-195