Thematic Structure in Students’ Writings: Implications on their Ideas Organization and Development

Authors

  • Zefki Okta 4Department of Language Education Science, Faculty of Languages, Arts, and Cultures, Yogyakarta State University, 55281 Indonesia
  • Ashadi Ashadi Yogyakarta State University
  • Sulis Triyono Yogyakarta State University
  • Dwiyanto Djoko Pranowo Yogyakarta State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v16i1.49-72

Keywords:

academic writing, thematic structure, thematic Progression, writing proficiency

Abstract

Thematic structure is an important concept in organizing ideas in academic writing. Although numerous studies have focused on investigating how it is realized in students' writing, only a few focus on investigating thematic structure in students' text across different proficiency levels. This article is based on a study analyzing idea organization and development in 24 high and low-scoring essays through Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL). It was a qualitative content analysis with complementary quantitative data. The results show significant differences in how ideas are organized and developed in high and low-scoring essays. Even though all types of Themes (topical, interpersonal, textual Theme) were observed in both groups, the high-scoring essays elaborated more themes than the low ones indicating that the high-scoring essays comprised more clauses. As for Thematic Progression, all the patterns were present in the essays. The Linear Theme pattern was primarily applied in high-scoring essays, while the Constant Theme pattern was applied frequently in the low-scoring ones. The Split Rheme pattern was less observed in all the students' essays. These findings indicate that the high achievers provided more expounded ideas through linear theme patterns, whereas their counterparts tended to focus on a subject reflected through Theme reiteration. Thus, this implies that proficiency characterized writers in organizing and developing ideas in writing as reflected through thematic Choice and Progression.

Author Biographies

Ashadi Ashadi, Yogyakarta State University

He is a lecturer at Department of Applied Linguistics of Yogyakarta State University

Sulis Triyono, Yogyakarta State University

He is a lecturer at Department of Language Education Science of Yogyakarta State University

Dwiyanto Djoko Pranowo, Yogyakarta State University

He is a lecturer at Department of Language Education Science of Yogyakarta State University

References

Adawiyah, R. (2016). An Analysis of Theme-Rheme Organization on Academic Essay Written by the Fifth Semester students of UIN Raden Fatah Palembang. [Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis]. UIN Raden Fatah Palembang.

Alyousef, H. S. (2016). A Multimodal Discourse Analysis of the Textual and Logical Relations in Marketing Texts Written by International Undergraduate Students. Functional Linguistics. 3(3), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-016-0025-1

Alyousef, H. S. (2021). The status of Theme in research article abstracts in seven dentistry subdisciplines: A text-based study of intradisciplinary variations and similarities in thematic choices and thematic progression patterns. Journal of Language and Education, 7(1), 28-45, https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.10574

Bakaa, A. J. A. I. (2015). Functional Analysis of Marked and Unmarked Theme in Demonstrating a Critical Argument Written by Iraqi and Australian Postgraduate Students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(2), 247. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0502.03

Bangga, L. A. (2013). An Investigation of Theme and Theme Progression of Students' Exposition Text: A Case Study in a State University. [Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis]. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Bloor, T. & Bloor, M. (2004). The Functional Analysis of English. Oxford University Press.

Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Butt, D., Fahey, R., Feez, S., Spinks, S., & Yallop, C. (2001). Using Functional Grammar an Explorer's Guide. New South Wales: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.

Chen, Q. (2019). Theme-Rheme structure in Chinese doctoral students' research writing - From the first draft to the published paper. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 37, 154-167, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.12.004

Choung, Y., & Oh, S. (2016). A Systemic Functional Study of Thematic Organization in the English Writing of Korean College Students. English Teaching. 72(3), 119-144. DOI: 10.15858/engtea.72.3.201709.119

Crompton, P. (2004). Theme in Discourse. Functions of Language, 11(2), 213-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.11.2.04cro

Ebrahimi, S. F., & Ebrahimi, S. J. (2012). Markdness in Writing: A Case of EFL Students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(4), 733-777. doi:10.4304/tpls.2.4.773-777

Ebrahimi, S. F., & Ebrahimi, S. J. (2014). Thematic Progression Patterns in the IELTS Task 2 Writing. Journal of Advances in Linguistics. 3(3), 254-258.

Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). Continuum.

Francis, G. (1990). Theme in the daily press. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics, 4: 51-87.

Februana, D. M. (2014). Thematic Development of Narrative Writings of the Third Semester Students of English Department of IKIP PGRI Semarang. [Unpublished Thesis]. Universitas Diponegoro.

Gerot, L. & Linda, P. (1995). Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Gerd Stabler.

Gunawan, W. & Aziza, F. (2017). Theme and Thematic Progression of Undergraduate Thesis: Investigating Meaning Making in Academic Writing. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 7(2), 413-424.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i2.8350

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An Introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). An Introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). Arnold.

Hawes, T. (2015). Thematic Progression in the writing of students and professionals. Ampersand, 2, 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2015.06.002

Hendrawan, W., Sujatna, E.T.S., Krisnawati, E., & Darmayanti, N. (2021). Thematic Progression in Uncovering Paragraph Coherence: Some Evidences in Indonesian Secretarial Academy Context. TESOL International Journal, 10(1), 179-209

Jalilifar, A. R. (2009). Thematic Development in English and Translated Academic Texts. Journal of Language and Translation, 10(1), 81-111.

Jalilifar, A. R. 2(010a). The Status of Theme in Applied Linguistics Articles. Asian ESP Journal, 6(2), 7-39..

Jalilifar, A. R. (2010b). Thematization in EFL Students’ Composition Writing and its Relation to Academic Experience. RELC Journal, 41(1), 31-45.

Jing, W. (2014). Theme and Thematic Progression in English Writing Teaching. Journal of Education and Practice. 6(2)1, 178-187.

Knapp, P & Watkins, M. (2005). Genre, text, grammar: Technologies for teaching and assessing grammar. UNSW Press.

Khuder, B & Harwood, N. (2014). L2 Writing in Test and Non-Test Situations: Process and Product. Journal of Writing Research, 6(3), 233-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2015.06.03.2

Leong, A. P., Toh, A. L. L., & Chin, S. F. (2019). Examining Structure in Scientific Research Articles: A Study of Thematic Progression and Thematic Density. Written Communication. 00(0), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088318767378

Liu, L., & Tucker, G. (2015). Thematic Choice and Progression in English and Chinese Radio News Texts: A Systemic Functional Analysis. Text & talk, 35(4), 481-504.

Loré, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organisation. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 280–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.06.001

Lumley, T, (2002). Assessment criteria in a large-scale writing test: What do they mean to the raters? Lang Test, 19(3), 246–276. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532202lt230oa

Mahsun. (2014). Teks dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Kurikulum 2013. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Marfuaty, F., & Wahyudi, R. (2015). An Analysis of Thematic Progression Patterns: Opinion Section Texts of The Jakarta Post. International Journal of Language Studies. 9(3), 109-130.

Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. & Halliday, M. A. K. (1997). Systemic FUcntional Grammar: A first step into the theory. Higher Education Press.

Mayring, P. (2003). Qualitative inhaltsanalyse, grundlagen und techniken (8th ed.). UTB.

McCabe, A. (1999). Theme and Thematic Patterns in Spanish and English History Texts. Retrieved 9 July 2019. Available at URL http://www. wagsoft.com/systemics/archive/McCabe.phd

McCabe, A. & Belmonte, I. A. (1998). Theme-Theme Patterns in L2 Writing. Didactica, 10: 13-31.

Mellos, V. D. (2011). Coherence in English as a Second Language Undergraduate Writing: A Theme-Rheme Analysis. [Published Thesis]. San Diego State University.

Narita, F. (2016). An Analysis of the Theme and Thematic Progression of Narrative Texts in English Test Constructed by Teacher. [Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis]. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Njobvu, N. & Simwinga, J. (2022). Does Thematic Progression Enhance English Discourse Coherence? Evidence from Selected University of Zambia Students' Written Discourse International. Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 10(3), 29-41 https://doi.org/10.20431/2347-3134.1003004

North, S. (2005). Disciplinary Variation in the Use of Theme in Undergraduate Essays. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 431-452. doi:10.1093/applin/ami023

Noviyanty. (2015). Thematic Progression in Students' Recount Texts. [Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis]. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Pardiyono. (2016). Sure You Can Genre Mastering English through Context. ANDI Yogyakarta.

Pavavijarn, S. (2022). Influences of thematic Progression on quality of EFL argumentative writing. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(1), 282-319.

Ping, A. L. (2005). Talking Themes: The Thematic Structure of Talk. Discourse Studies, 7(6), 701-732. DOI 10.1177/1461445605055423

Ping, A. L. (2007). Developing the Message: Thematic Progression and Student Writing. The Journal of ASIA TEFL, 4(3), 93-127.

Ping, A. L. (2015). Topical Themes and thematic Progression: The "picture" of research articles. Text and Talk, 35(3), 289–315. DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2015-0001

Ping, A. P., Toh, Audrey, A. L. L. & Chin, S. F. (2018). Examining Structure in Scientific Research Articles: A study of Thematic Progression and Thematic Density. Written Communication, Vol. 35(3) 286 –314. DOI:10.1177/0741088318767378

Rafiei, K., & Modirkhamene, S. (2012). Thematicity in Published vs. Unpublished Iranian TEFL Theses. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(6), 1206–1213. DOI:10.4304/tpls.2.6.1206-1213

Rahmawati, R. V., & Kurniawan, E. (2015). Thematic Progression Analysis in Indonesian Efl Students' Thesis Abstracts. Indonesian EFL Journal, 1(1), 81–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v1i1.617

Rahnemon, S. N., Ahangar, A. A. & Nourmohammadi, E. (2017). Thematic Structure and Translation: A Case Study of the Translation of English New Into Persian. Lingua, 194, 26-50. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.05.003

Rakhman, A. N. (2013). An Analysis of Thematic Progression in High School Students' Exposition Texts. [Undergraduate Thesis]. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Rueg, R. & Sugiyama Y. (2013). Organizing Ideas in Writing: What are Raters Sensitive to? Language Testing in Asia. 3(8), 1-13. DOI:10.1186/2229-0443-3-8

Safitra, Z. (2013). Theme System of Systemic Functional Grammar in Students' Narrative Texts. [Undergraduate Thesis]. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Schleppregell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Sharndarma, E. C., & Panamah, J. H. (2013). Thematic Structure and Progression in Selected Business News Reports of Two Nigerian Newspaper: Implications for Professional Writing. Journals of Arts and Humanities, 2(7), 72-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v2i7.167

Sianipar, R. T. (2015). Theme and Thematic Progression Analysis of Analytical Exposition Texts. [Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis]. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Soleymanzadeh, L. & Gholami, J. (2014). Scoring Argumentative Essays based on Thematic Progression Patterns and IELTS Analytic Scoring Criteria. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 98, 1811 – 1819. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.610

Thalib, N. A. B. A. (2014). Theme and Thematic Progression of Malaysian Higher Education Advertorials. [Unpublished Thesis]. University of Malaya.

Undayasari, D., & Saleh, M. (2018). Comparison of Thematic Structure and Progression between English and Indonesian Exposition Texts Written by Undergraduate Students of UPI (Rhetorical Study). English Education Journal, 8(1), 43-50.

Wang, L. (2007). Theme and Rheme in the thematic organization of text: Implications for teaching academic writing. Asian EFL Journal, 9(1), 164-176.

Wei, J. (2013). Corpus-based research on the development of thematic choices in Chinese learners' English speech. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(16), 38-45.

Wei, J. (2016). Thematic Choice in Chinese College Students' English Essays. English for Specific Purposes. 41, 50-67. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.09.003

Wiratno, T. (2018). Pengantar Ringkas Linguistik Sistemik Fungsional. Pustaka Pelajar.

Xu, R. (2000). Theme and Cohesion in the Writing of English Expository Texts by Chinese EFL Learners. [Unpublished Thesis]. University of Wollongong,.

Yang, X. (2008). Thematic progression analysis in teaching exploration writing. English language teaching, 1(1), 29-33. DOI:10.5539/elt.v1n1p29

Yunita, S. (2018). Theme and Thematic Progression in Students' Recount Texts. Indonesia Journal of Applied Linguistics. 7(3), 524-530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9797

Downloads

Published

2023-04-26

How to Cite

Okta, Z., Ashadi, A., Triyono, S., & Djoko Pranowo, D. (2023). Thematic Structure in Students’ Writings: Implications on their Ideas Organization and Development. Register Journal, 16(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v16i1.49-72