Exploring Asnaf Students’ Acceptance of an Islamic-Integrated English Module in Malaysian Muslim Orphanage

Authors

  • Nur Yasmin Khairani Zakaria Teaching and Learning Innovation Research Center, Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia
  • Harwati Hashim Teaching and Learning Innovation Research Center, Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia
  • Khairul Azhar Jamaludin Education Leadership & Policy Research Center, Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia

Keywords:

English language learning, AI chatbots, ChatGPT, EFL students, Writing, Communicative competence, Communicativeness, Communicative Language Teaching, Focus Group Interview, Fundamental Reform Document of Education, Paradigm Shifts

Abstract

English language proficiency, particularly communicative competence, is essential for socio-economic mobility. Communicative competence in English refers to the ability to communicate effectively in all contexts. However, asnaf students—underprivileged Muslim individuals from Islamic backgrounds—often encounter Western-centric content that can lead to feelings of alienation and eventually limits their learning. Recognizing this need, the present study explores the integration of Islamic content into a communicative English module to create a more inclusive and responsive educational experience for asnaf students. Utilizing a Design and Development Research (DDR) model, this study comprises three phases: analyzing students’ learning needs, developing content for the module, and evaluating asnaf students’ acceptance of the module. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and classroom observations, where researchers recorded students’ engagement in class and participants reflected on their learning experiences. Thematic analysis revealed four key themes: confidence in spoken English, connection to Islamic-integrated content, participation in tasks, and challenges in the English language. The study noted several limitations, including a small sample size and a relatively short intervention period, impacting generalizability. Future research could replicate the module in different socio-religious settings or employ quantitative approaches to further assess its effectiveness on language performance.

References

Amoah, S., & Yeboah, J. (2021). The speaking difficulties of Chinese EFL learners and their motivation towards speaking the English language. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(1), 56–69. https://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/2394

Astrid, A., Hasanah, A., & Syafryadin, S. (2020). Creating full English atmosphere in teaching English to young learners: Teachers’ perspectives. Register Journal, 13(2), 351–370. http://dx.doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v13i2.351-370

Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clark, J. R., Shlobin, N. A., Batra, A., & Liotta, E. M. (2022). The relationship between limited English proficiency and outcomes in stroke prevention, management, and rehabilitation: A systematic review. Frontiers in Neurology, 13, 790553. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.790553

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Djazilan, M. S., & Hariani, M. (2022). Implementation of E-learning-based Islamic religious education. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 1(2), 14–21. https://inti.ejournalmeta.com/index.php/inti/article/view/12/12

Fakhrurriana, R., & Ningsih, W. A. (2023). Developing digital English-learning supplementary media for students of Islamic studies. Proceeding International Conference on Education, 1, 369–376. https://jurnalfaktarbiyah.iainkediri.ac.id/index.php/proceedings/article/view/1742/660

Farangi, M. R., & Mehrpour, S. (2024). Iranian preschoolers' vocabulary development: Background television and socio-economic status. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 24(2), 422–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687984211073653

Farrell, T. S. C. (2015). Reflective Practice in ESL Teacher Development Groups: From Practices to Principles. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hashim, C. N., & Langgulung, H. (2008). Islamic religious curriculum in Muslim countries: The experiences of Indonesia and Malaysia. Bulletin of Education & Research, 30(1), 1–19. https://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/ier/currentissue_pdf/5_Che%20Noraini%20Article_BER.pdf

Hassan, M. K. (1989). Values education framework based on Islamic concepts and precepts. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 2(3), 71–83. http://irep.iium.edu.my/71/1/kamal_hassan-values_education.pdf

Hoerudin, C. W., Syafruddin, S., Mayasari, A., Arifudin, O., & Lestari, S. (2023). E-learning as a learning media innovation in Islamic education. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Agama, 15(1), 723–734. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v15i1.4466

Hosaini, H., Zukin, A., & Firdaus, M. (2022). Development of Islamic religious education books with contextual teaching and learning. At-Tarbiyat: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(1), 113–125. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/22ff/2fdbb5ffaaea395e98766b583bbda732028a.pdf

Hussain, S. M., Rana, S., Aziz, F., Baloch, A. R. C., Jamil, F., & Arif, M. (2024). Challenges of AI in the classroom: A case study of English language learning for students in unprivileged areas of Pakistan. Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL, 7(4), 1294–1295. https://jalt.com.pk/index.php/jalt/article/view/227/183

Karim, A., Khemanuwong, T., Ferdous, T., Humaira, T., Sultana, S., & Ismail, S. A. M. M. (2024). Do gender, socioeconomic status and regional difference predict the reading comprehension of English as a foreign language (EFL) learners? MEXTESOL Journal, 48(4). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1468415.pdf

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press. https://www.sdkrashen.com/content/books/principles_and_practice.pdf

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2016). Second language research: Methodology and Design (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315750606

Mardiana, H. (2020). Lecturers’ attitudes towards online teaching in the learning process. Register Journal, 13(1), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v13i1.77-98

Md Yazid, N. H., Sulaiman, N. A., & Hashim, H. (2024). A systematic literature review of web-based learning and digital pedagogies in grammar education (2015–2024). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(9), 2524–2535. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i9/22858

Metruk, R. (2022). Smartphone English language learning challenges: A systematic literature review. SAGE Open, 12(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221079627

Mohamad, M., & Zakaria, N. Y. K. (2018). Development of English language camp module: Reception and perception of Asnaf pupils in Malaysia. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, 8(2), 31–32. https://doi.org/10.7187/GJAT122018-3

Nattheeraphong, A. (2020). Underprivileged students’ second language motivation: Cases of three highly-motivated non-English major students. rEFLections, 27(2), 199–217. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v27i2.248392

Puad, M. H. M., Jamil, Z., Rahman, E., & Mukhtar, N. (2024). Kepentingan kemahiran kebolehkerjaan dalam kalangan graduan pendidikan dan latihan teknikal dan vokasional (TVET). In Proceedings of Seminar Kebangsaan Majlis Dekan Pendidikan Universiti Awam 2024 (pp. 344–365). Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Ramalingam, S., Yunus, M. M., & Hashim, H. (2022). Blended learning strategies for sustainable English as a second language education: A systematic review. Sustainability, 14(13), 8051. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138051

Richards, J. C. (2003). Classroom observation in teaching practice. TESOL Journal, 12(1), 12–17.

Richards, J. C. (2005). Communicative Language Teaching Today. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.

Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Tracey, M. W. (2010). The instructional design knowledge base: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203840986

Sari, L. I., & Sari, R. H. (2022). Lecturers’ challenges and strategies in teaching Maritime English online to students with low English proficiency. Register Journal, 15(2), 222–244. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v15i2.222-244

Shobikah, N. (2023). Factor analysis affecting English speaking proficiency based on open access articles on ScienceDirect database. Asian Journal of Islamic Education, 7(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.35723/ajie.v7i1.377

Singh Negi, J., & Laudari, S. (2022). Challenges of developing learner autonomy of English as foreign language (EFL) learners in underprivileged areas. International Journal of Research in English Education, 7(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.52547/ijree.7.2.65

Souriyavongsa, T., Rany, S., Abidin, M. J. Z., & Mei, L. L. (2013). Factors causes students low English language learning: A case study in the National University of Laos. International Journal of English Language Education, 1(1), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v1i1.3100

Suharsiwi, S., Lestari, J. T., & Karim, S. (2024). Islamic content-based learning: Kindergarten illustrated narrative song “Lulu and Tom.” Assyfa Journal of Islamic Studies, 1(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.61650/ajis.v2i1.331

Tan, L. Y., & Listyani, L. (2020). The use of communicative language learning (CLL) to teach speaking at a Taiwanese elementary school: Implementation and students’ responses. Register Journal, 13(2), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v13i2.257-276

Villacañas de Castro, L. S., Cano Bodi, V., & Hortelano Montejano, A. (2018). Teaching English as a non-imperial language in an underprivileged public school in Spain. TESOL Quarterly, 52(4), 943–970. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.442

Villacañas de Castro, L. S., Cano Bodi, V., Hortelano Montejano, A., Giner Real, C., Gómez Pons, I., Mesas Tomás, B., Sanz Martínez, C., & Tortosa Gozálvez, C. (2021). Matter, literacy, and English language teaching in an underprivileged school in Spain. TESOL Quarterly, 55(1), 54–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.572

Waluyo, B., & Bucol, J. L. (2021). The impact of gamified vocabulary learning using Quizlet on low-proficiency students. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 22(1), 158–179. https://old.callej.org/journal/22-1/Waluyo-Bucol2021.pdf

Wang, J., Abdullah, R., & Leong, L.-M. (2022). Studies of teaching and learning English-speaking skills: A review and bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Education, 7, 880990. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.880990

Xu, L., Abdullah, T., & Tang, X. (2024). Impacts of family environment on Chinese university students’ English language proficiency: The mediating effect of parenting styles. SAGE Open, 14(4), 21582440241289802. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241289802

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Yürekli, A., & Afacan, A. (2020). Journal writing and diary journal writing: Effects on students’ writing proficiency and student and teacher attitudes. Register Journal, 13(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v13i1.1-48

Published

2025-08-21

How to Cite

Zakaria, N. Y. K., Hashim, H., & Jamaludin, K. A. (2025). Exploring Asnaf Students’ Acceptance of an Islamic-Integrated English Module in Malaysian Muslim Orphanage. Register Journal, 18(1), 173–198. Retrieved from https://ejournal.uinsalatiga.ac.id/index.php/register/article/view/4076