Exploring EFL Supervisors' Feedback on Postgraduates' Research Proposals: Functions and Foci

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v16i2.207-223

Keywords:

Academic Writing, thesis Proposal Writing, EFL supervisors, supervisory feedback, T

Abstract

Supervisory feedback plays a crucial role in supervising research in higher education. Feedback is a crucial component of successful teaching practices in the context of postgraduate research proposal writing. Effective supervisory feedback can promote supervisees' academic writing and enhance the quality of their research proposals. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the feedback functions and feedback foci that EFL supervisors employ in their written feedback when refining postgraduate research proposals. A qualitative approach and simple descriptive quantitative measures were adopted to address the study's aims and estimate the prevalence of feedback forms. The study's sample included (N = 5) supervisors (4 male and 1 female supervisor) supervising postgraduate students as part of the M.A. in Applied Linguistics program. Data were collected from five supervisory feedback reports on postgraduates' research proposals and proposal drafts. The finding revealed that the EFL supervisors predominantly used directive feedback (52%) in their feedback provision instead of referential (30%) and expressive feedback (18%). Additionally, the findings showed that the EFL supervisors primarily focused on content issues (53%), followed by organization (29%) and appropriateness (19%), and the lowest number of supervisory feedback focused on linguistic accuracy (16%). The study provides pedagogical implications for supervisors and recommendations for further studies.

Author Biographies

Atef AbuSaaleek, Associate professor of Applied Linguistics, Department of English, College of Education, Majmaah University

Dr. Atef Odeh AbuSa'aleek is an associate professor of Applied Linguistics, Department of English, College of Education, Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah, 11952, Saudi Arabia. His research interests are Applied Linguistics, Internet Linguistics, CALL, EFL writing, electronic discourse and electronic feedback. E-mail: a.odeh@mu.edu.sa   ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4727-2455

Aied Alenizi , Associate professor of linguistics. Department of English, College of Education, Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah,

Dr. Aied Alenizi is an associate professor of linguistics. Department of English, College of Education, Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah, 11952, Saudi Arabia. His major research interests include second language acquisition/studies, English language learning, discourse analysis and pragmatics. E-mail: a.alenizi@mu.edu.sa  ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9875-4668 

 

References

Achmad, I & Islamiati, S. (2022). Students’ Perception toward Supervisors’ Written Feedback in Writing Thesis Proposal. Teaching English and Language Learning English Journal (TELLE), 2(1), 22-31. https://doi.org/10.36085/telle.v2i1.3331

Al Qunayeer, H. S. (2020). Supporting postgraduates in research proposals through peer feedback in a Malaysian university. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(7), 956-970. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1627299

Bastola, M. N. (2020). Formulation of feedback comments: Insights from supervisory feedback on master’s theses. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1804985

Basturkmen, H., East, M., & Bitchener, J. (2014). Supervisors’ onscript feedback comments on drafts of dissertations: Socialising students into the academic discourse community. Teaching in Higher Education, 19, 432–445.

Bitchener, J. (2018). Teacher written feedback. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1–7). John Wiley

Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.

Deshpande, A. (2017). Faculty Best Practices to Support Students in the ‘Virtual Doctoral Land.’ Higher Education for the Future, 4(1), 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631116681211

Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2020). Using educational psychology in teaching. Pearson.

Gedamu, A. D., & Gezahegn, T. H. (2021). EFL supervisors’ written feedback focus and language functions: A mixed methods study. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 6(1), 1-18.

Gezahegn, T. H., & Gedamu, A. D. (2023). Supervisors' and supervisees' perception and perceived practice of a process-oriented thesis written feedback: The case of Ethiopian universities. Heliyon, 9(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12865

Ghazal, L., Gul, R. B., Hanzala, M., Jessop, T., & Tharani, A. (2014). Graduate students’ perceptions of written feedback at a private university in Pakistan. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(2), 13-27

Gul, R., Tharani, A., Lakhani, A., Rizvi, N., & Ali, K. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions and practices of written feedback in higher education. World Journal of Education, 6(3), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v6n3p10

Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 185–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S10603743(01)00038-8

Lucero, M., Fernández, M., & Montanero, M. (2018). Teachers’ written feedback comments on narrative texts in elementary and secondary education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 158–167

Neupane B., M., & Hu, G. (2021). Supervisory feedback across disciplines: does it meet students’ expectations? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(3), 407-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1780562

Nurie, Y. (2018). Higher education supervision practices on student thesis writing: Language function and focus of written feedback. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30(3), 522–533.

Odena, O., & Burgess, H. (2017). How doctoral students and graduates describe facilitating experiences and strategies for their thesis writing learning process: A qualitative approach. Studies in higher education, 42(3), 572-590.

Rasool, U., Aslam, M. Z., Qian, J., & Barzani, S. H. H. (2022). The effects of online supervisory feedback on student-supervisor communications during the covid-19. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1569-1579. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1569

Ritesh Chugh, Stephanie Macht & Bobby Harreveld (2022) Supervisory feedback to postgraduate research students: a literature review, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(5), 683-697, https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1955241

Roumell, E. A., & Bolliger, D. U. (2017). Experiences of faculty with doctoral student supervision in programs delivered via distance. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 65(2), 82-93.

Saeed, M. A., Al Qunayeer, H. S., & AL-Jaberi, M. A. (2021). Exploring supervisory feedback formulation on academic writing of research proposals and postgraduates’ responses to feedback: A case study. Sage Open, 11(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211007125

Saldana, J. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research: Understanding qualitative research. Oxford University Press Inc.

Skinner, B. F. (2011). About behaviorism. Vintage.

Xu, L. (2017). Written feedback in intercultural doctoral supervision: A case study. Teaching in Higher Education, 22, 239–255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1237483

Zellermayer, M. (1989). The study of teachers' written feedback to students' writing: Changes in theoretical considerations and the expansion of research contexts. Instructional science, 18(2), 145-165.

Zheng, Y., Yu, S., Wang, B., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Exploring student engagement with supervisor feedback on master’s thesis: Insights from a case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57, 186–197.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-02

How to Cite

AbuSaaleek, A., & Alenizi , A. (2023). Exploring EFL Supervisors’ Feedback on Postgraduates’ Research Proposals: Functions and Foci. Register Journal, 16(2), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v16i2.207-223