Neoliberal Branding and the Commodification of Language: English as the Language of Success in Advertisements for Language Centre in Pakistan

Authors

  • Iftikhar Khan Department of English, Faculty of Social Sciences, Air University, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Dr. Sham Haidar College and Humanities and Social Sciences KIMEP University, Almaty, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v17i2.250-278

Abstract

Neoliberalism, an economic system rooted in free markets and market-driven policies, extends the concept of commodities beyond traditional goods to domains such as language. In this framework, the English language is assigned exchange value and is marketed as a commodity within neoliberal economies. This phenomenon is prominently observed in advertisements of language centers, where English is branded as essential for success. Drawing upon Bourdieu's theory of linguistic capital (1991, 1997), this study adopts an interpretivist paradigm and employs qualitative research methods. English language center advertisements were selected through purposive sampling, and Kress and van Leeuwen's multimodal model (2006) serves as the analytical framework. The study finds that language centers actively promote English proficiency as a means to empower individuals in the linguistic marketplace. These advertisements consistently portray English as a language of success, positioning it as a gateway to career advancement and personal development. However, some advertisements also employ tactics to influence potential clients by disseminating accurate information.

Author Biographies

Iftikhar Khan, Department of English, Faculty of Social Sciences, Air University, Islamabad, Pakistan

Department of English, Faculty of Social Sciences, Air University, Islamabad, Pakistan

Dr. Sham Haidar , College and Humanities and Social Sciences KIMEP University, Almaty, Kazakhstan

College and Humanities and Social Sciences KIMEP University, Almaty, Kazakhstan

ORCID ID : 0000-0002-6024-4846

References

Arkoudis, S., Baik, C., Bexley, E., & Doughney, L. (2014). English language proficiency and employability framework. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education.

Block, D. (2017). What is language commodification? In S. Breidbach, L. Kuster & B. Schmenk (eds.), Sloganizations in language education discourse. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods (5th ed.). New York: Pearson Education.

Bouton, K. (2017). English as a Global Commodity. (Unpublished Honors Program thesis). Liberty University, Virginia, USA.

Bourdieu, P. (1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social science information, 16(6), 645-668. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847701600601

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1997). The forms of capital. In A.H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown & A.S. Wells (eds) Education: Culture, Economy, Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (2011). The forms of capital. In M. Granovetter & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The sociology of economic life (pp. 78-92). Routledge.

Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.C. (1990). Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture (2nd ed). London: Sage.

Cameron, D. (2012). The commodification of language: English as a global commodity. In T. Nevalainen & E. C. Traugott (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of

English (pp 352-361). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Clément, R., Noels, K. A., & Deneault, B. (2001). Interethnic contact, identity, and psychological adjustment: The mediating and moderating roles of communication. Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), 559-577. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00229

Coleman, H. (Ed.). (2011). Dreams and realities: Developing countries and the English language. British council.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2008). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (5th ed.). Sage.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). London: Sage Publication.

Del Percio, A., Flubacher, M. C., & Duchêne, A. (2017). Language and political economy. In O. García, N. Flores & M. Spotti (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and society (pp. 55-76). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Duchêne, A., & Heller, M. (Eds.). (2013). Language in late capitalism: Pride and profit. London: Routledge.

Ganti, T. (2014). Neoliberalism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 43, 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155528

Gilbert, J. (2013). What kind of thing is' neoliberalism'? New Formations, 80(80), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.3898/nEWF.80/81.IntroductIon.2013

Gray, J. (2010). The construction of English culture, consumerism and promotion in the ELT global coursebook. Springer.

Grishnova, O., & Panaseiko, S. (2021). Knowledge of English as an asset of human capital. Economics & Education, 6(4), 53-59. https://doi.org/10.30525/2500-946X/2021-4-8

Grin, F. (2001). English as economic value: Facts and fallacies. World Englishes, 20(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00196

Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (2000). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. Denizen & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 105–117). Sage.

Haidar, S. (2019). The role of English in developing countries: English is a passport to privilege and needed for survival in Pakistan. English Today, 35(3), 42-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078418000469

Haidar, S., & Fang, F. (2019). English language in education and globalization: A comparative analysis of the role of English in Pakistan and China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 39(2), 165-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2019.1569892

Haidar, S., Malik, S., & Samiullah. (2022). Neoliberalism, Globalisation and Englishism: Exploring ideological assumptions attached with the English language in Pakistan. In A. J. Daghigh, J. M. Jan & S. Kaur (Eds). Neoliberalization of English language policy in the Global South (pp. 195-213). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Heller, M. (2003). Globalization, the new economy, and the commodification of language and identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(4), 473–492.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2003.00238

Heller, M., & Duchêne, A. (2016). Treating language as an economic resource: In N. Coupland (Ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates (pp. 139-156). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Heller, M., Pujolar, J., & Duchêne, A. (2014). Linguistic commodification in tourism. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18, 539–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12082

Holliday, A. (2009). English as a lingua franca, ‘non-native speakers’ and cosmopolitan realities. In F. Sharifi (Ed.), English as an international language perspectives and pedagogical issues (pp. 21-33). Multilingual Matters.

House, J. (2003). English as a lingua franca: A threat to multilingualism? Journal of sociolinguistics, 7(4), 556-578. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00187.x

Jenkins, J. (2013). English as a lingua franca in the international university: The politics of academic English language policy. Routledge.

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Kotler, P. (2001). Marketing Management Millenium Edition (10th ed.). Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Kotz, D. M. (2002). Globalization and neoliberalism. Rethinking Marxism, 14(2), 64-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/089356902101242189

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2021). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. B. (2017). Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts. International Journal of higher education, 6(5), 26-41. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1154775

Liamputtong, P. (2009). Qualitative data analysis: conceptual and practical considerations. Health promotion journal of Australia, 20(2), 133-139. https://doi.org/10.1071/HE09133

Li, J., Xu, M., & Chen, J. (2022). A Bourdieusian analysis of the multilingualism in a poverty-stricken ethnic minority area: can linguistic capital be transferred to economic capital? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 43(2), 122-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1733585

Mahboob, A. (2002). No English, no future: Language policy in Pakistan. In S. G. Obeng

& B. Hartford (Eds.), Political independence with linguistic servitude: The politics about languages in the developing world, (pp. 15-40). New York: Nova Science Publishers.

Melitz, J. (2018). English as a lingua franca: Facts, benefits and costs. The World Economy, 41(7), 1750-1774. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12643

Moore, R. (2008). Capital. In Michael Grenfell (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu key concepts (pp. 101-117). Routledge.

Pan, L., & Block, D. (2011). English as a “global language” in China: An investigation into learners’ and teachers’ language beliefs. System, 39(3), 391-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.07.011

Park, J. S. Y. (2011). The promise of English: Linguistic capital and the neoliberal worker in the South Korean job market. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 14(4), 443-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.573067

Park, J. S. Y., & Wee, L. (2013). Markets of English: Linguistic capital and language policy in a globalizing world. Routledge.

Rahman, T. (2009). Language ideology, identity and the commodification of language in the call centers of Pakistan. Language in Society, 38(2), 233-258. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404509090344

Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (2003). Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publication.

Rubdy, R., & Tan, P. K. W. (Eds.). (2008). Language as commodity: Global structures, local marketplaces, London: Continuum.

Shamim, F. (2008). Trends, issues and challenges in English language education in Pakistan. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 28(3), 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188790802267324

Silver, R. E. (2005). The discourse of linguistic capital: Language and economic policy planning in Singapore. Language policy, 4, 47-66. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10993-004-6564-4

Simpson, W. (2022). Capital, commodity, and English language teaching. Routledge.

Simpson, W., & O'Regan, J. P. (2018). Fetishism and the language commodity: A materialist critique. Language Sciences, 70, 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2018.05.009

Steger, M. B., & Roy, R. K. (2010). Neoliberalism: A very short introduction (Vol. 222). Oxford University Press, USA.

Tan, P. K., & Rubdy, R. (Eds.). (2008). Language as commodity: Global structures, local marketplaces. London, UK: Continuum.

Tylén, K., Weed, E., Wallentin, M., Roepstorff, A., & Frith, C. D. (2010). Language as a tool for interacting minds. Mind & Language, 25(1), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2009.01379.x

Wilson, R. M., & Gilligan, C. (2012). Strategic marketing management. Routledge.

Wu, M. M. F. (2018). Is second language teaching enslavement or empowerment? Insights from an Hegelian perspective. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(1), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1317626

Downloads

Published

2024-08-02

How to Cite

Khan, I., & Haidar , D. S. (2024). Neoliberal Branding and the Commodification of Language: English as the Language of Success in Advertisements for Language Centre in Pakistan . Register Journal, 17(2), 250–278. https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v17i2.250-278