CALL Design Processes in the Indonesian and Australian Universities: Practical Advice on Co-Design Capabilities in the Post-digital Futures

Authors

  • Dewi Wahyu Mustikasari Post-Graduate School, UIN Salatiga, Indonesia
  • Lyla Anggerwina Kusuma Language Centre, Macquarie University, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v17i1.225-249

Keywords:

Design process, CALL task design, co-design, postdigital futures

Abstract

This paper discusses the authors’ personal reflective notes in designing Computer Assisted-Language Learning (CALL) task design for English language teaching for the students in both Indonesian and Australian universities. The multiple case study was employed to see the different TPACK competence, and also social, economic, and geographical backgrounds of both universities. The authors brought together their teacher design practices at the classroom level and their roles in a team design aimed to analyse the design processes using two fields of study perspectives: Learning Design and CALL. Therefore, the classroom observation and reflection teaching journal were used as data to answer a specific case of CALL task design which focused on viewing the CALL task and learning design of English language university teachers, a model drawn on the field of Learning Design, developed by Mustikasari et al. (2022). The cross-case analysis of both universities found out that the University Culture of Leadership Commitment and students’ partner were suggested to escalate the English learning quality and value in post digital world.

References

Agostinho, S. (2011). The use of a visual learning design representation to support the design process of teaching in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(6). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.923

Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Dimitriadis, Y., Pozzi, F., Hernández-Leo, D., Prieto, L. P., Persico, D., & Villagrá-Sobrino, S. L. (2017). Towards teaching as design: Exploring the interplay between full-lifecycle learning design tooling and teacher professional development. Computers & Education, 114, 92-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.011

Bennett, S., Agostinho, S., & Lockyer, L. (2015). Technology tools to support learning design: Implications derived from an investigation of university teachers' design practices. Computers & Education, 81, 211-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.016

Bennett, S., Agostinho, S., & Lockyer, L. (2017). The process of designing for learning: Understanding university teachers’ design work. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 125-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9469-y

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach (Vol. 722). Springer Science & Business Media.

Brown, C., Huber, E., Bone, E., Gribble, L., Lys, I., Dickson-Deane, C., Yu, P., Markauskaite, L., & Campbell, C. (2023). Academic women co-designing education futures in a postdigital world. Postdigital Science and Education, 1-21.

Dalziel, J. (2015). Reflections on the art and science of learning design and the larnaca declaration. In The art & science of learning design (pp. 1-14). Brill.

Dickson-Deane, C. (2020). Designing with Forgiveness in Mind for the Process. Handbook of Research in Educational Communications and Technology: Learning Design, 661-673.

Dickson-Deane, C. (2021). Moving practical learning online. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 235-237.

Dickson-Deane, C. & Sutherland, J. (2022). Educational technology infrastructure to enable learning: The 2021-2022 Contextualising Horizon Report.

Dickson-Deane, C., Heggart, K., & Vanderburg, R. (2023). Designing Learning Design Pedagogy: Proactively Integrating Work-Integrated Learning to Meet Expectations. In Design education across disciplines: Transformative learning experiences for the 21st century (pp. 125-142). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Dishon, G. (2023). Designed to death? The tensions underpinning design in educational discourse. Postdigital Science and Education, 1-19.

Fawns, T., Jones, D., & Aitken, G. (2020). Challenging assumptions about “moving online” in response to COVID-19, and some practical advice. MedEdPublish, 9.

Hains-Wesson, R., Ji, K., & Wu, E. (2023). Students' Perceptions of Employability Skill Development through a Theater and Reality of the Board Model. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 24(4), 537-552.

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 101-111.

Koper, R. (2006). Current research in learning design. Educational Technology & Society, 9 (1), 13–22.

Macgilchrist, F., Jarke, J., Allert, H., & Pargman, T. C. (2024). Design Beyond Design Thinking: Designing Postdigital Futures when Weaving Worlds with Others. Postdigital Science and Education, 6(1), 1-12.

Mor, Y., Craft, B., & Maina, M. (2015). Introduction: Learning design: Definitions, current issues and grand challenges. The art & science of learning design, 9-26.

Mustikasari, D. W., Heggart, K., & Dickson-Deane, C. (2022) Indonesian English Teachers’ Design Practices: How

Technological Affordances and Costs Effect Learning Designs and Impact Student Learning. 45th Annual AECT Proceedings. Selected research and development papers. pp.232-241. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michael-Simonson/publication/376352704_2022_AECT_Proceedings_-_Volumes_1_and_2_complete_with_cover/links/65737b1a6610947889aee20e/2022-AECT-Proceedings-Volumes-1-and-2-complete-with-cover.pdf#page=246

Mustikasari, D. W., & Heggart, K. (2023). Blended and Online Distance Learning in Indonesian Higher Education: A Systems Perspective. In Reimagining Systems Thinking in a Post-Pandemic World (pp. 172-191). IGI Global.

Singh, J., Steele, K., & Singh, L. (2021). Combining the best of online and face-to-face learning: Hybrid and blended learning approach for COVID-19, post vaccine, & post-pandemic world. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2), 140-171.

Sun, S. Y. (2017). Design for CALL–possible synergies between CALL and design for learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(6), 575-599.

Sun, S. Y. (2021). Using patterns-based learning design for CALL tasks. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(8), 1061-1084.

Sun, S. Y., & Goodyear, P. (2020). Social co-configuration in online language learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 13-26.

Webb, A., McQuaid, R. W., & Webster, C. W. R. (2021). Moving learning online and the COVID-19 pandemic: a university response. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 18(1), 1-19.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-13

How to Cite

Mustikasari, D. W. ., & Kusuma, L. A. (2024). CALL Design Processes in the Indonesian and Australian Universities: Practical Advice on Co-Design Capabilities in the Post-digital Futures. Register Journal, 17(1), 225–249. https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v17i1.225-249