Unveiling the Lecturers’ and Students' Needs in English for Public Administration Program: Essential Vocabulary Topics, Instructional Methods, and Learning Challenges
Abstract
The lack of attention given in scholarly research to the particular requirements of Public Administration has resulted in a knowledge deficit to suit students' interests in this discipline. Prior research has predominantly examined the quantitative dimensions of vocabulary acquisition while neglecting to adequately consider the qualitative aspects, including comprehension and language use, in a contextually appropriate manner. This study aims to fill in these knowledge deficits by investigating vocabulary themes or topics related to Public Administration, evaluating existing instructional approaches and challenges, and suggesting enhancements to bolster students' English language proficiency in Public Administration. The study employs a qualitative methodology, including an open-ended questionnaire and in-depth interviews with four lecturers and 100 first-year students from three universities in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. The findings revealed that the English for Public Administration curriculum requires a diverse vocabulary of topics from administration, management, and governance to more nuanced areas such as economics, finance, taxation, social and ethics, technology and digitalization, leadership, and regulation and law. Various teaching and assessment strategies regarding instructional methods, including interactive and collaborative methods, technology integration, and contextual learning, suggest the importance of engaging students with diverse and practically relevant content to prepare them for the multifarious nature of public sector roles. Students, however, found some challenges in the complexity of the Public Administration vocabulary, highlighting the need for tailoring educational strategies, such as project-based learning and vocabulary reinforcement techniques, to overcome these obstacles. The study's findings have substantial implications for policymakers, curriculum developers, and lecturers specializing in public administration education.
References
Abrahamse, A., Johnson, M., Levinson, N., Medsker, L., Pearce, J. M., Quiroga, C., & Scipione, R. (2015). A virtual educational exchange: A north–south virtually shared class on sustainable development. Journal of Studies in International Education, 19(2), 140–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315314540474
Alford, J., & Brock, J. (2014). Interactive education in public administration. Teaching Public Administration, 32(2), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739413515491
Alsahafi, M. (2023). The relationship between depth of academic English vocabulary knowledge and academic success of second language university students. SAGE Open, 13(1), 215824402311533. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231153342
Arias-Contreras, C., & Moore, P. J. (2022). The role of English language in the field of agriculture: A needs analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 65, 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.09.002
Astri, Z., Hs, N., Fachrunnisa, N., & Misnawati, M. (2023). Investigating the Influence of the TPR Method on the Development of English Vocabulary in Small Classroom (pp. 771–781). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-054-1_66
Astri, Z., Nur, S., & Misnawati, M. (2022). Need analysis of pharmacy students in TOEFL preparation class. VELES Voices of English Language Education Society, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v6i1.4917
Bailey, A. L., & Heritage, M. (2008). Formative assessment for literacy: Building reading and academic language skills across the curriculum. Corwin.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Capobianco, S., Chen, X., Líppez-De Castro, S., & Rubaii, N. (2018). Enhancing global and intercultural competencies in Master of Public Administration classes. Teaching Public Administration, 36(2), 178–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739417753031
Coxhead, A. (2019). Academic vocabulary. In The Routledge Handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 97–110). Routledge.
Flynn, A. E., & Klein, J. D. (2001). The influence of discussion groups in a case-based learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504916
Guerrero, M. D. (2004). Acquiring academic English in one year: An unlikely proposition for English language learners. Urban Education, 39(2), 172–199.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Heberle, A. E., Thomann, C. R. B., & Carter, A. S. (2020). Social and emotional development theories. In Encyclopedia of Infant and Early Childhood Development (pp. 173–182). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.23633-X
Jordan, R. R. (1997). English for academic purposes: A guide and resources book for teachers. Cambridge University press.
Kareva, V. (2013). English for specific purposes: Public administration and political sciences. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1477–1481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.214
Karkin, N., & Gurses, F. (2022). An analysis of the public administration curricula in Turkey: Realities, expectations, and attitudes toward novel courses. Teaching Public Administration, 40(3), 366–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739421997514
Loewen, S., & Ellis, R. (2004). The relationship between English vocabulary knowledge and the academic success of second language university students. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 1–29.
Masrai, A., Milton, J., El-Dakhs, D. A. S., & Elmenshawy, H. (2021). Measuring the contribution of specialist vocabulary knowledge to academic achievement: disentangling effects of multiple types of word knowledge. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 6, 1–15.
Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2013). Vocabulary size revisited: the link between vocabulary size and academic achievement. Applied Linguistics Review, 4(1), 151–172.
Misnawati, M. (2021). English for media literacy for lecturers (EML-E)(Material resume and review of the Online Professional English Network (OPEN) by George Mason University). In Journal of English for Academic and Specific (Vol. 4).
Misnawati, M. (2022). Assessment of English foreign language learners : MOOC material resume and review of Online Professional English Network (OPEN). Elsya : Journal of English Language Studies, 4(2), 168–177. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v4i2.9755
Misnawati, M., Yusriadi, Y., & Tahir, S. Z. (2022). MALL in learning English through social networking tools : Students’ perceptions on Instagram feed-based task and peer feedback. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal (CALL-EJ), 23(2), 198–216. http://www.callej.org/journal/23-2/Misnawati-Yusriadi-Zulfiqar2022.pdf
Misnawati, M., Yusriadi, Y., & Zulfiqar Bin Tahir, S. (2023). QR Code Scanning System as a Meaning-Focused Input Approach in. In MEXTESOL Journal (Vol. 47, Issue 3). https://www.mextesol.net/journal/index.php?page=journal&id_article=46464
Mooij, T. (2007). Design of educational and ICT conditions to integrate differences in learning: Contextual learning theory and a first transformation step in early education. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1499–1530. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.07.004
Nagy, W., & Townsend, D. (2012). Words as tools: Learning academic vocabulary as language acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.011
Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52(3), 513–536.
Roche, T., & Harrington, M. (2013). Recognition vocabulary knowledge as a predictor of academic performance in an English as a foreign language setting. Language Testing in Asia, 3(1), 1–13.
Schleppegrell, M., & de Oliveira, L. C. (2006). An integrated language and content approach for history teachers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(4), 254–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.08.003
Schnotz, W., & Kürschner, C. (2007). A reconsideration of cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 469–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9053-4
Short, D. J., & Fitzsimmons, S. (2007). Double the work: Challenges and solutions to acquiring language and academic literacy for adolescent English language learners. Alliance for Excellent Education.
Snow, C. E. (2010). Academic language and the challenge of reading for learning about science. Science, 328(5977), 450–452. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182597
Strevens, P. (1988). ESP after twenty years: A re-appraisal. In M. Tickoo (Ed.), ESP: State of the art (pp. 1–13). SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
Sun, P. P. (2020). Theoretical and conceptual frameworks. In Chinese as a Second Language Multilinguals’ Speech Competence and Speech Performance (pp. 11–29). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6941-8_2
Szabo, C. Z., Stickler, U., & Adinolfi, L. (2021). Predicting the academic achievement of multilingual students of English through vocabulary testing. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24(10), 1531–1542.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Misnawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
REGISTER JOURNAL: https://ejournal.uinsalatiga.ac.id/index.php/register/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Copyright Notice
An author who publishes in REGISTER JOURNAL agrees to the following terms:
- The author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- The author can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.
Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal. They will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
