Rural community perceptions and preferences toward loan sharks: A case study in Padang Pariaman Regency from an Islamic finance perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18326/ijier.v8i1.6715Keywords:
financial inclusion, islamic finance, loan sharks, perceptions and preferences, rural communitiesAbstract
This study examines rural community perceptions of loan shark practices, the factors driving dependence on informal lending, and the potential of sharia-based financing alternatives in Padang Pariaman Regency. Using a qualitative descriptive field approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and documentation across five sub-districts. The findings indicate that loan sharks are perceived as fast, simple, and accessible sources of financing for urgent household and micro-business needs. However, their high interest rates and rigid installment systems are considered burdensome and exploitative. Although most respondents recognize that such practices involve riba and contradict Islamic principles, borrowing persists due to unstable income, limited savings, and restricted access to formal and Islamic financial institutions. Community reliance is therefore driven more by structural constraints than by acceptance of interest-based transactions. This study highlights the need to strengthen accessible, fast, and inclusive Islamic microfinance as a viable alternative to reduce dependence on loan sharks.
References
Abubakar, A., & Basri, H. (2022). Praktik pinjaman informal dan dampaknya terhadap ekonomi masyarakat berpendapatan rendah. Journal of Community Economics, 7(2), 115–128.
Andriansyah, R. (2024). The role of Islamic microfinance institutions in rural financial inclusion. Journal of Islamic Microfinance Studies, 6(1), 21–35.
Anggito, A., & Setiawan, J. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. CV Jejak.
Dusuki, A. W., & Abdullah, N. I. (2007). Why do Malaysian customers patronize Islamic banks? International Journal of Bank Marketing, 25(3), 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320710739850
Firdausi, F., & Mubarok, F. (2024). Preferensi masyarakat desa terhadap lembaga keuangan informal. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 12(1), 33–48.
Hermawan, W. (2005). Teknik penulisan karya ilmiah. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Hosoya, Y. (2025). Revealed preference theory. In M. A. Khan, N. Sagara, & A. J. Zaslavski (Eds.), Matching, dynamics and games for the allocation of resources: Essays in celebration of David Gale's 100th birthday. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-6661-4_2
Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. B. (2002). The qualitative researcher’s companion (T. Oaks (ed.)). Sage Publications.
Jonathan, S. (2006). Metode penelitian sosial. Salemba Empat.
Kandi, R. (2023). Psikologi persepsi dalam perilaku sosial. Prenadamedia Group.
Kotler, P. (2005). Marketing Management (11th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Lestari, D., & Fasa, M. I. (2022). Konsep riba dalam perspektif ekonomi Islam. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Islam, 8(2), 101–114.
Mankiw, N. G. (2012). Principles of Economics (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Maryati, S., & Suryawanti, R. (2014). Metode pengumpulan data kualitatif. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial, 5(1), 45–58.
Monica, R. (2023). Persepsi masyarakat terhadap pinjaman bank keliling. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 9(2), 77–89.
Moriarty, S. (2011). Qualitative research methods. Sage Publications.
Nienhaus, V. (2011). Islamic finance ethics and Shari'ah law in the aftermath of the crisis: Concept and practice of Shari'ah compliant finance. Ethical Perspectives, 18(4), 591–623.
Nursipian, A., & Ahmad, Z. (2024). Loan shark practices and financial vulnerability. Journal of Financial Inclusion, 4(1), 1–15.
Padgett, D. K. (2016). Qualitative methods in social work research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Panjaitan, F. E., & Nofrion. (2018). Praktik pelepas uang / rentenir di Nagari Lubuk Basung Kabupaten Agam Sumatra Barat. Jurnal Buana, 2(1), 398-409.
Pohan, A. (2023). Persepsi masyarakat terhadap lembaga pinjaman informal. Jurnal Ekonomi Masyarakat, 8(1), 25–39.
Pratama, R. (2023). Literasi keuangan dan keputusan pinjaman masyarakat desa. Journal of Financial Studies, 5(2), 66–80.
Puspaningrum, W. R., & Masrukin. (2021). Dampak pinjaman informal terhadap ekonomi rumah tangga. Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 6(2), 91–104.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2009). Organizational Behavior. Pearson Education Limited.
Rosana, D. (2023). Prinsip keadilan dalam lembaga keuangan syariah. Jurnal Fiqh Muamalah, 9(1), 12–27.
Schermerhorn, H. J. G., Osborn, R. N., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2011). Organizational behavior (11th ed.). John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Schiffman, L. G., & Wisenblit, J. (2019). Consumer behavior. Pearson Education Limited.
Somantri, G. R. (2005). Metode observasi dalam penelitian sosial. Jurnal Sosiologi, 3(1), 23–37.
Sugiyono. (2010). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfa Beta.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Alfa Beta.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kombinasi (mixed methods). Alfa Beta.
Varian, H. R. (2003). Intermediate microeconomics: A modern approach (6th ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
Wahidah, S., & Ritonga, M. (2023). Ketergantungan masyarakat terhadap rentenir. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Islam, 5(1), 44–58.
Yulianti, E. (2025). Informal finance adaptation in rural communities. Journal of Rural Development Studies, 11(1), 1–18.
Yusuf, M. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Kencana.
Zhou, J., Korkmaz, A. G., Li, Y., Yue, P., & Yan, Y. (2025). The sword of damocles: Debt and depression. International Review of Financial Analysis, 98, Article 103877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103877
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Erizal Candra Efendi, Muchlis Bahar, Duhriah, Salmy Edawati Yaacob, Irwandi Jaswir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
