Managing Emergency Talk with Child Callers: A Conversation Analysis of Operator–Child Dialogues in 911 Calls
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v8i3.899-933Keywords:
Conversation Analysis, emergency calls, child callers, turn-taking, adjacency pairsAbstract
Children’s emergency calls are high-risk institutional encounters in which fear, limited communicative ability, and the need for rapid response occur simultaneously, yet the interactional participation of child callers in actual 911 conversations remains underexplored. This article examines how operators and child callers organize emergency talk and how conversational structures support the production of usable information under conditions of emotional pressure. The analysis draws on three selected 911 calls from the True 911 Calls YouTube channel involving callers between 4 and 12 years old. The age range is treated as a descriptive characteristic of the data rather than as a single developmental category; each call is examined as an individual interactional case before recurring patterns are identified across the data. The recordings were transcribed using Jeffersonian conventions and analyzed through Conversation Analysis, focusing on turn-taking, adjacency pairs, sequence organization, preference organization, and repair mechanisms. The findings show that the calls remain institutionally organized despite hesitation, emotional expressions, and incomplete responses. Adjacency pairs are the most prominent pattern, followed by preference organization, turn-taking, repair mechanisms, and sequence organization. These practices enable operators to obtain, clarify, and organize emergency information while accommodating children’s interactionally displayed difficulties. Future research should compare different developmental age groups and combine Conversation Analysis with interactional sociolinguistics to examine broader social and institutional contexts.
References
Antaki, C., & Kent, A. (2015). Offering alternatives as a way of issuing directives to children: Putting the worse option last. Journal of Pragmatics, 78, 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.004
Bell, J., & Condren, M. (2016). Communication strategies for empowering and protecting children. The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 21(2), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-21.2.176
Bolden, G. B. (2013). Unpacking “self”: Repair and epistemics in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 76(4), 314–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272513498398
Booker, M. J., Shaw, A. R., Purdy, S., & Barnes, R. (2018). Primary care sensitive situations that result in an ambulance attendance: A conversation analytic study of UK emergency “999” call recordings. BMJ Open, 8(11), Article e023727. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023727
Church, A., & Bateman, A. (2019). Methodology and professional development: Conversation Analytic Role-play Method (CARM) for early childhood education. Journal of Pragmatics, 143, 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.022
Cook, G. (1990). Discourse. Oxford University Press.
Cromdal, J., Osvaldsson, K., & Persson-Thunqvist, D. (2008). Context that matters: Producing “thick-enough descriptions” in initial emergency reports. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(5), 927–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.09.006
Cromdal, J., Persson-Thunqvist, D., & Osvaldsson, K. (2012). “SOS 112 what has occurred?” Managing openings in children’s emergency calls. Discourse, Context & Media, 1(4), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2012.10.002
Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students. Routledge.
Davison, G., Kelly, M. A., Conn, R., Thompson, A., & Dornan, T. (2021). How do children and adolescents experience healthcare professionals? A scoping review and interpretive synthesis. BMJ Open, 11(7), Article e054368. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054368
Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 3–65). Cambridge University Press.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.
Garcia, A. C. (2024). Crisis negotiation techniques in interactional context: Managing a suicide threat in an emergency service call. Qualitative Health Communication, 3(2), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.7146/qhc.142862
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.
Goffman, E. (1956). The presentation of self in everyday life. University of Edinburgh, Social Sciences Research Centre.
Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1992). Media space and communicative asymmetries: Preliminary observations of video-mediated interaction. Human–Computer Interaction, 7(3), 315–346. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI0703_3
Hepburn, A. (2004). Crying: Notes on description, transcription, and interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(3), 251–290. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3703_1
Hepburn, A., & Bolden, G. B. (2013). The conversation analytic approach to transcription. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 57–76). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch4
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2021). Conversation analysis (3rd ed.). Polity Press.
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). John Benjamins.
Jenkins, L., Hepburn, A., & MacDougall, C. (2020). How and why children instigate talk in pediatric allergy consultations: A conversation analytic account. Social Science & Medicine, 266, Article 113291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113291
Jones, N., & Raymond, G. (2012). “The camera rolls”: Using third-party video in field research. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 642(1), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212438205
Kevoe-Feldman, H. (2021). Calming emotional 911 callers: Using redirection as a patient-focused directive in emergency medical calls. Language & Communication, 81, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2021.09.001
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Liddicoat, A. J. (2007). An introduction to conversation analysis. Continuum.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Martini, I. (2023). Conversation analysis and frame analysis combined: A proposal to study the use of language in paediatric surgical visits. LEA: Lingue e Letterature d’Oriente e d’Occidente, 12, 279–294. https://doi.org/10.36253/lea-1824-484x-14499
Mey, J. L. (1994). Pragmatics: An introduction. Blackwell.
Møller, T. P., Ersbøll, A. K., Tolstrup, J. S., Østergaard, D., Viereck, S., Overton, J., & Lippert, F. (2015). Why and when citizens call for emergency help: An observational study of 211,193 medical emergency calls. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 23, Article 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-015-0179-y
Morgenstern, A., Leroy-Collombel, M., & Caët, S. (2013). Self- and other-repairs in child–adult interaction at the intersection of pragmatic abilities and language acquisition. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.017
Moriarty, E. (2024, June 9). Texas girl played dead to survive shooting that killed her family. CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/48-hours-live-to-tell-sole-survivor-robin-doan/
Muzenda-Mudavanhu, C., Manyena, B., & Collins, A. E. (2016). Disaster risk reduction knowledge among children in Muzarabani District, Zimbabwe. Natural Hazards, 84(2), 911–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2465-z
Nattrass, R., & Watermeyer, J. (2025). Where trouble starts: Communication breakdown in a complex emergency call. Health Communication, 40(3), 394–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2346677
Paltridge, B., & Burton, J. (2000). Making sense of discourse analysis. Antipodean Educational Enterprises.
Peräkylä, A. (1997). Reliability and validity in research based on tapes and transcripts. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 201–220). SAGE Publications.
Petri, A. E. (2022, November 28). ‘Um, I need help’: Boy makes 911 call from inside father’s car. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-11-28/um-i-need-help-boy-makes-911-call-from-inside-fathers-car
Pomerantz, A., & Heritage, J. (2013). Preference. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 210–228). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch11
Rand, B. (2019, January 7). 9-year-old boy calls 911, helps save his grandfather’s life. ABC News. https://abcnews.com/US/year-boy-calls-911-helps-save-grandfathers-life/story?id=60214815
Raymond, G., & Zimmerman, D. H. (2016). Closing matters: Alignment and misalignment in sequence and call closings in institutional interaction. Discourse Studies, 18(6), 716–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445616667141
Rheisa, N. S. (2014). A conversation analysis of repair in The Oprah Winfrey Show: A special episode with Michael Jackson [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta].
Riou, M., Ball, S., O’Halloran, K. L., Whiteside, A., Williams, T. A., & Finn, J. (2018). Hijacking the dispatch protocol: When callers pre-empt their reason-for-the-call in emergency calls about cardiac arrest. Discourse Studies, 20(5), 666–687. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445618754435
Riou, M., Ball, S., Williams, T. A., Whiteside, A., O’Halloran, K. L., Bray, J., & Finn, J. (2017). “Tell me exactly what’s happened”: When linguistic choices affect the efficiency of emergency calls for cardiac arrest. Resuscitation, 117, 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.05.018
Riou, M., Perera, N., Ball, S., Whiteside, A., & Finn, J. (2026). ‘You don’t think? But you can check’: Do emergency callers really express uncertainty when they say ‘I (don’t) think’? Discourse Studies, 28(1), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456251332813
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (G. Jefferson, Ed.; Vols. 1–2). Blackwell.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis I. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.2307/413107
Sherman, R. R., & Webb, R. B. (Eds.). (1988). Qualitative research in education: Focus and methods. Falmer Press.
Shapiro, E. (2018, July 3). ‘We can’t get her back alive’: 7-year-old calls 911 after baby sister falls in pool. ABC News. https://abcnews.com/US/back-alive-year-calls-911-baby-sister-falls/story?id=56338185
Sidnell, J. (2013). Basic conversation analytic methods. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 77–99). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch5
Stenström, A.-B. (1994). An introduction to spoken interaction. Longman.
Stivers, T., Sidnell, J., & Bergen, C. (2018). Children’s responses to questions in peer interaction: A window into the ontogenesis of interactional competence. Journal of Pragmatics, 124, 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.11.013
Sui, W., Sui, A., & Rhodes, R. E. (2022). What to watch: Practical considerations and strategies for using YouTube for research. Digital Health, 8, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221123707
True 911 Calls. (n.d.). Home [YouTube channel]. YouTube. Retrieved June 15, 2026, from https://www.youtube.com/c/True911calls
Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: A comparative and critical introduction. SAGE Publications.
Yildiz, A., Dickinson, J., Priego-Hernández, J., & Teeuw, R. (2023). Children’s disaster knowledge, risk perceptions, and preparedness: A cross-country comparison in Nepal and Turkey. Risk Analysis, 43(4), 747–761. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13937
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sandina Tasya Aulia, Agwin Degaf, Layli Hamida, Agustinus Hary Setyawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS RESEARCH agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Indonesian Pragmatics Association
