Legitimization of Violence in the Political Discourse of Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu during the Gaza War Press Conference
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v8i1.311-346Keywords:
political discourses, Ideological Square, Trump, Netanyahu, Critical Discourse AnalysisAbstract
Political discourse on Gaza often employs the language of peace to obscure practices of violence and domination. Within the broader field of discourse and ideology studies, this issue occupies a complex intersection between language, power, and moral justification, yet it remains underexplored as a collaborative construction between two state leaders speaking in a shared public forum. This article aims to examine how these leaders simultaneously deploy linguistic strategies to normalize warfare and legitimize coercion, rather than merely to produce persuasive or emotive speech. The study draws on qualitative data collected through content analysis of the video and transcript of a joint press conference, interpreted within Van Dijk’s critical discourse framework that maps ideological structures at both macro and micro levels. The findings reveal a carefully orchestrated combination of authority, numerical framing, disclaimers, national glorification, hyperbole, and lexical choices that portray the in-group as moral saviors while silencing the suffering of the out-group. Such discursive patterns divert global attention from humanitarian crises toward policies that primarily serve hegemonic interests, reinforcing domination through language. The article recommends strengthening public critical literacy, enhancing transparency in humanitarian reporting, and extending comparative studies across political contexts to better understand how discourse legitimizes violence in contemporary political communication.
References
Ahmed, M. S., Abed, T. M., & Hussain, K. H. (2022). Israeli-Palestinian struggle. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S8), 3676–3688. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6ns8.12928
AJLabs. (2025, January 15). The human toll of Israel’s war on Gaza – by the numbers. Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/1/15/the-human-toll-of-israels-war-on-gaza-by-the-numbers
Ajour, A. (2025). Unveiling the colonial violence of space in the Gaza genocide. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 0(0). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494241310778
AlAsttal, T. K. M. (2024). Unveiling the power of words: A critical discourse analysis of Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech at the United Nations General Assembly on September 27, 2024. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 7(12), 205–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2024.7.12.223
Allin, D. H., & Simon, S. N. (2017, February 13). Trump and the holy land. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/israel/2017-02-13/trump-and-holy-land
Althusser, L. (2014). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In On the reproduction of capitalism: Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (pp. 232–272). Verso.
Amir, M. (2021). Post-occupation Gaza: Israel’s war on Palestinian futures. Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography, 103(4), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2021.1958357
Ayalew Nigatu, B., & Tadesse Admassu, M. (2023). Critical discourse analysis of the second inaugural speech of Ethiopia’s Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2172805
Badarussyamsi, Syam, N., Ermawati, & As’ad. (2024). Hegemony of Trump: Manifestation of Islamophobia in an inaugural speech. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v14i1.70355
Banchoff, T. (2008). Religious pluralism, globalization, and world politics. Oxford University Press.
Béland, D., Rocco, P., Segatto, C. I., & Waddan, A. (2021). Trump, Bolsonaro, and the framing of the COVID-19 crisis: How political institutions shaped presidential strategies. World Affairs, 184(4), 413–440. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00438200211053314
Bello, U. (2013). “If I could make it, you too can make it!” personal pronouns in political discourse: A CDA of President Jonathan’s presidential declaration speech. International Journal of English Linguistics, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v3n6p84
Berndsen, M., Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., Bliuc, A. M., & Hendres, D. M. (2017). Glorifying national identification increases schadenfreude about asylum seekers when they are a threat, not entitled to seek asylum, and blamed for their adversity. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 2(2–3), 166–198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2017.1360573
Bhatia, A. (2006). Critical discourse analysis of political press conferences. Discourse & Society, 17(2), 173–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506058057
Byman, D. (2024). A war they both are losing: Israel, Hamas and the plight of Gaza. Survival, 66(3), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2024.2357484
Cavari, A. (2013). Religious beliefs, elite polarization, and public opinion on foreign policy: The partisan gap in American public opinion toward Israel. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr053
Cavari, A. (2020). Trump, Israel, and the shifting pattern of support for a traditional ally. In S. A. Renshon & P. Suedfeld (Eds.), The Trump Doctrine and the Emerging International System (pp. 281–315). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45050-2_12
Degaf, A., Aziza, R., & Anggrisia, N. F. (2025). Analyzing the 2021 Israel–Palestinian coverage: A critical discourse study. Eltin Journal: Journal of English Language Teaching in Indonesia, 13(1), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.22460/eltin.v13i1
Ekström, M. (2016). Press conferences. In G. Mazzoleni (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of political communication (pp. 1–5). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc048
Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and power (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Gavriely-Nuri. (2010). The idiosyncratic language of Israeli “peace”: A cultural approach to critical discourse analysis (CCDA). Discourse & Society, 21, 565–585. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510375934
Gavriely-Nuri, D. (2014). “Talking peace - going to war”: Peace in the service of the Israeli just war rhetoric. Critical Discourse Studies, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.835979
Gilboa, E. (2008). The public dimension of US-Israel relations. In E. Gilboa & E. Inbar (Eds.), US-Israeli relations in a new era (1st ed., Issue 3, pp. 53–57). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887127
Gilboa, E. (2023). US-Israel relations at 75. Israel Affairs, 29(3), 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2023.2206210
Grinin, L., & Korotayev, A. (2020). Seven weaknesses of the U.S., Donald Trump, and the future of American hegemony. World Futures, 77(1), 23–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2020.1801309
Gunawan, Y., Budiman, A., Fauziah, N., & Syamsudin, W. O. F. A. Z. (2023). Journalist protection on the battlefield under the international humanitarian law: Russia-Ukraine war. Jurnal Hukum Unissula, 39(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.26532/jh.v39i1.24685
Hanafi, S. (2009). Spacio-cide: colonial politics, invisibility and rezoning in Palestinian territory. Contemporary Arab Affairs, 2(1), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/17550910802622645
Holland, S., Spetalnick, M., & Mason, J. (2025, February 5). In shock announcement, Trump says U.S. wants to take over Gaza Strip. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/trump-netanyahu-set-pivotal-talks-middle-east-agenda-2025-02-04/
Houlette, H. (2024). Amid the fray: A thematic discourse analysis of presidential statements issued in response to the 2023 war in Israel and Palestine. Innovative Higher Education, 49, 927–952. https://doi.org/ttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-024-09719-3
Ish-Shalom, P. (2008). The rhetorical capital of theories: The democratic peace and the road to the roadmap. International Political Science Review, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512107088393
Kadim, E. N. (2022). A critical discourse analysis of Trump’s election campaign speeches. Heliyon, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09256
Kafi, L., & Degaf, A. (2021). Euphemism and dysphemism strategies in Donald Trump’s speech at SOTU 2020. International Journal of Humanity Studies, 4(2), 194–207. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v4i2.3205
Khan, M. H., Adnan, H. M., Kaur, S., Qazalbash, F., & Ismail, I. N. (2020). A critical discourse analysis of anti-Muslim rhetoric in Donald Trump’s historic 2016 AIPAC policy speech. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 40(4), 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2020.1828507
Khan, M. H., Qazalbash, F., Adnan, H. M., Yaqin, L. N., & Khuhro, R. A. (2021). Trump and Muslims: A critical discourse analysis of Islamophobic rhetoric in Donald Trump’s selected tweets. SAGE Open, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211004172
Koplow, M. J. (2011). Value judgment: Why do Americans support Israel? Security Studies, 20(2), 266–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2011.572690
Łapaj-Kucharska, J. (2023). A long-distance affair: An overview of Australian-Israeli relations. Israel Affairs, 29(3), 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2023.2206227
Li, M., Watkins, H. M., Hirschberger, G., Kretchner, M., Leidner, B., & Baumert, A. (2023). National glorification and attachment differentially predict support for intergroup conflict resolution: Scrutinizing cross-country generalizability. European Journal of Social Psychology, 53(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2881
Leep, M., & Pressman, J. (2019). Foreign cues and public views on the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 21(1), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148118809807
Luo, X., He, M., & Yu, Z. (2022). An ideological analysis of the former President Donald Trump’s tweets during COVID-19. Corpus Pragmatics, 6, 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-021-00113-4
Machin, D., & van Leeuwen, T. (2016). Multimodality, politics and ideology. Journal of Language and Politics, 15(3), 243–258. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.3.01mac
Massad. (2006). The persistence of the Palestinian question. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203965351
Moses, J. (2024). Gaza and the political and moral failure of the responsibility to protect. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 18(2), 211–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2024.2304987
Parkin, D. (1984). Political language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 13, 345–365. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.13.100184.002021
Qowim, A. A., & Degaf, A. (2024). Kanjuruhan tragedy in The New York Times: A critical discourse analysis. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(3), 468–476. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v13i3.66957
Rababah, A. G., & Hamdan, J. M. (2019). A contrastive critical discourse analysis of Netanyahu’s and Abbas’s speeches on the Gaza war (2014). Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(1), 178. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1001.20
Rabab’ah, G., Hussein, A., & Jarbou, S. (2024). Hate Speech in political discourse: An analysis of former US president Trump’s rhetoric. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 37(7), 2237–2256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-024-10158-8
Rafferty, A. (2017, February 16). Trump to Netanyahu “I’d like to see you hold back on settlements a little bit.” NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-netanyahu-i-d-see-you-hold-back-settlements-little-n721351
Ramos, E., & Hikmawan, R. (2022). Analyzing the what and how of United States foreign aid to Israel 2017-2020. Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 5(3), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1991.05.03.364
Raza, S., Scholar, M. P., Azaz, S., & Shah, A. (2024). Critical discourse analysis of discursive strategies utilized in Donald Trump and Joe Biden’s inaugural speeches. Al-Mahdi Research Journal (MRJ), 5(4), 245–256. https://ojs.mrj.com.pk/index.php/MRJ/article/view/328
Simonsen, S. (2019). Discursive legitimation strategies: The evolving legitimation of war in Israeli public diplomacy. Discourse and Society, 30(5), 503–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926519855786
Steffek, J. (2009). Discursive legitimation in environmental governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 11(5–6), 313–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2009.04.003
Tal, D. (2021). United States-Israel relations (1953-1957) revisited. Israel Studies, 26(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.2979/israelstudies.26.1.02
Van Dijk. (1995). Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In C. Schäffne & A. L. Wenden (Eds.), Language & Peace (1st ed., p. 18). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203984994
Van Dijk. (2000). Ideology and discourse: A multidisciplinary introduction. Pompeu Fabra University. http://www.discourses.org/download/books
Van Dijk. (2006). Politics, ideology, and discourse. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 728–740). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00722-7
Van Dijk. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 466–485). Blackwell Publishers. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753460.ch19
Viveash, D. (2021). Has President Trump killed the Middle East peace process? Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 27(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/11926422.2020.1842219
Veronika, I. D., & Degaf, A. (2024). Anti-vaccine COVID-19 narratives: A critical textual analysis of American and Indonesian online news. Studies in English Language and Education, 11(3), 1782–1800. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i3.37380
Wodak, R. (2014). Critical discourse analysis. In C. Leung & B. V Street (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to English Studies (1st ed., p. 15). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315852515
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory, and methodology. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (1st ed., Issue 1, p. 1). SAGE Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Farabi Nirmala, Agwin Degaf
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS RESEARCH agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Indonesian Pragmatics Association
