Exploring Speech Acts In "Heidi": An Analysis of Direct and Indirect Communication in Cinematic Dialogue

Authors

  • Rahayu UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
  • Agwin Degaf UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
  • Nur Fitria Anggrisia English Literature Study Program, Faculty of Humanities, UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v6i2.148-168

Keywords:

Pragmatics, speech acts, types of speech acts, meaning of speech acts, Heidi

Abstract

This research analyzes the use of speech acts in the movie Heidi, selected for its rich content and depiction of effective communication and moral values, particularly the importance of adaptation in a new environment. The character Heidi, a talkative young girl, provides valuable examples of how communication is established and maintained through her interactions. The study aims to identify the forms and meanings of speech acts used by the characters and to understand the interpretation of dialogues between speakers and hearers. The descriptive qualitative analysis method is employed to examine all utterances in Heidi that contain speech acts and speech strategies. The data are classified based on the forms of speech acts according to Wijana's theories and the meanings of speech acts using Searle's theory. The findings reveal the presence of various types of speech acts, including direct literal, direct nonliteral, indirect literal, and indirect nonliteral speech acts. Specifically, 133 utterances were analyzed and categorized into Representative (27), Directive (50), Expressive (31), Commissive (25), and Declarative (1). The study also shows that characters in the movie predominantly use directive speech acts. This research enhances the understanding of speech act theory and its application in film dialogues, emphasizing the importance of context and intention in interpreting communication.

References

Aguert, M., Laval, V., Le Bigot, L., & Bernicot, J. (2010). Understanding expressive speech acts: The role of prosody and situational context in French-speaking 5- to 9-year-olds. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(6), 1467-1479. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2010/08-0078)

Alifa, A. R., & Degaf, A. (2021). Multilingual communication in K-pop: A translanguaging exploration of WayV's YouTube content. Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v8i1.9191

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Bach, K., & Harnish, R. (1979). Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Bara, B. G., Bosco, F. M., & Bucciarelli, M. (2020). Simple and complex speech acts: What makes the difference within a developmental perspective. In Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 151-158). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603494-15

Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatic and discourse. London and New York: Routledge.

Cutting, J., & Fordyce, K. (2021). Pragmatics: A resource book for students (4th ed.). Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.

Dewi, R. (2017). An analysis of directive speech acts in a classroom interaction. International Undergraduate Conference on English Education (IUCEE). https://doi.org/10.12928/iucee2022.v1i1,%20March.9129

Galdas, P. (2017). Revisiting bias in qualitative research: Reflections on its relationship with funding and impact. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917748992

Isnawati, F. D., et al. (2015). Speech acts analysis of the main character in Shrek movie script Analisis. Publika Budaya, 3(1), 60-64.

Justová, V. (2006). Direct and indirect speech acts in English (Major Bachelor’s thesis). Masaryk University, Faculty of Arts, Department of English and American Studies. Brno, Czech Republic.

Kareem, S. H., & Salam, N. B. (2019). A speech act analysis to the utterances of the animated cartoon series: The Adventures of Tintin. Zanco Journal of Humanity Sciences, 23(4), 322–341. https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.23.4.20

Kiuk, P. Y., & Ghozali, I. (2018). Speech acts analysis in Desmond’s conversation in “Hacksaw Ridge” movie. JELLT (Journal of English Language and Language Teaching), 2(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.36597/jellt.v2i1.2715

Makhlouf, A., & Amine, D. M. (2016). Communication and speech act theory: A contextual study of language. https://doi.org/10.34118/0136-000-047-021

Nazir, M. (2011). Metode penelitian (7th ed.). Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Priyandini, T. A., Abdullah, A., & Burhamzah, M. (2023). Speech acts used by the main character in "Encanto" Disney movie. ELITERATE: Journal of English Linguistics and Literature Studies, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.26858/eliterate.v3i1,Dec.48250

Rahardjo, M. (2020). Memilih metode penelitian kualitatif (pp. 30-31). Malang: Republik Media.

Rais, B., & Triyono, S. (2019). Pragmatic analysis of speech act on the video of Prabowo vs Jokowi epic battle of presidency. International Journal of Linguistic, 152-153.

Santia, S. I., & Kurniawan, F. (2019). Speech act found in “Aladdin” movie. Holistics Journal Hospitality and Linguistics, 11(2).

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837

Wijana, I. D. P. (1996). Dasar-dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Andi Yogyakarta.

Wijana, I. D. P. (2021). On speech acts. Journal of Pragmatics Research. IAIN Salatiga. Retrieved from https://e-journal.iainsalatiga.ac.id

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Zhang, Y. Y. (1995). Indirectness in Chinese requesting. In G. Kasper (Ed.), Pragmatics of Chinese as native and target language (pp. 69–118). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-04

How to Cite

Rahayu, E. A. P., Degaf, A., & Anggrisia, N. F. (2024). Exploring Speech Acts In "Heidi": An Analysis of Direct and Indirect Communication in Cinematic Dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 6(2), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v6i2.148-168