Speech Acts as a Communicative Strategy in Arabic Language Teaching

Authors

  • Muzakki Abdurrahman Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Mahjatin Nabilah Syarofina Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Nur Aqilah Lutfiya Rahma Opier Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18326/lisania.v10i1.62-77

Keywords:

Speech Acts, Communicative Strategy, Pragmatic Analysis, Classroom Interaction, Arabic Language Teaching

Abstract

Arabic language learning requires effective communication between teachers and students to support classroom interaction. Differences in linguistic background and communicative competence may influence how messages are delivered and understood during learning activities. Therefore, tadāwul af‘āl al-kalām (exchange of speech acts) becomes important in creating meaningful classroom communication. Speech acts also function as communicative tools that help teachers manage instruction and assist students in responding appropriately during classroom interaction. Through effective speech acts, the learning process can become more active, interactive, and learner-centered. This study aims to examine the forms, functions, and meanings of speech acts in Arabic classroom interaction and their role as communicative strategies in learning activities. This research employed a qualitative method using a pragmatic discourse analysis approach. Data were collected through classroom observation, interviews, and documentation at grade 10 of MAN 2 Gresik. The analysis focused on speech act dimensions, including locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary acts, as well as speech act categories consisting of directive, assertive, expressive, commissive, and declarative forms. The findings show that teachers predominantly used directive speech acts to organize classroom activities and encourage participation. Students commonly employed assertive speech acts to express understanding and provide responses, while expressive and commissive speech acts appeared in emotional and participatory contexts. These findings indicate that speech acts contribute to classroom interaction by supporting communication, participation, and learner engagement. The use of speech acts in Arabic language learning may help create a more interactive and communicative learning environment.

References

Al Khafaji, H., Amirian, Z., Amiryousefi, M., & Sultan, A. H. J. (2024). Pragmatic Instruction and Speaking Ability of Iraqi EFL Learners in Virtual vs. Face-to-face Classroom Contexts: Expressive, Declarative, and Directive Speech Acts in Focus. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 16(34), 19–36.

Alghazo, S., Zemmour, S., Al Salem, M. N., & Alrashdan, I. (2021). A cross-cultural analysis of the speech act of congratulating in Kabyle and Jordanian Arabic. Ampersand, 8, 100075.

Austin, J. L. (1962). Speech acts. Oxford.

Austin, J. L., & Warnock, G. J. (1962). Sense and sensibilia (Vol. 83). Clarendon Press Oxford.

Azhari, A. S., Priono, P., & Nuriadi, N. (2018). Speech acts of classroom interaction. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 4(2), 24–45.

Basra, S., & Thoyyibah, L. (2017). A speech act analysis of teacher talk in an EFL classroom. International Journal of Education, 10(1), 73–81.

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives (Vol. 2). Longmans, Green New York.

Chakim, M. A., & Dibdyaningsih, H. (2019). An analysis of teacher speech act in giving motivation for English students. Journal of English Language Teaching and Islamic Integration, 2(2), 218–229.

Eldin, A. A. T. S. (2015). Teaching Culture in the Classroom to Arabic Language Students. International Education Studies, 8(2), 113–120.

Hamid, M. an, Murtadho, M. A. C., Firdaus, A. Y., & Masturi. (2024). Language Environment and Acquisition Dynamics of Arabic in Pesantren: Perspectives on Islamic Education and Learning Tradition. International Journal of Islamic Thought and Humanities, 3(2), 387–400. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54298/ijith.v3i2.608

Iroda, E. (2025). Pragmatics Of Teachers’speech In Process Of Teaching. Modern Education and Development, 25(4), 105–113.

Karuniawan, D. Y. (2025). Analisis Tindak Tutur Asertif dalam Praktik Pembelajaran Teks Negosiasi pada Siswa Kelas X dan Impilkasinya terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Analitis. (JIBS) Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa Dan Sastra, 12(1), 94–102.

Kasper, G. (2006). Speech acts in interaction: Towards discursive pragmatics. Pragmatics and Language Learning, 11.

Leech, G. N. (1980). Explorations in semantics and pragmatics.

Mardiastuti, N. T. (2011). Tindak Tutur Direktif Guru SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Karanganyar (dalam Pembelajaran di Kelas XI). UNS (Sebelas Maret University).

Mardiningsih, M., El Sulukiyyah, A. A., & Santoso, B. H. (2023). Tindak Tutur Guru Dalam Project Based Learning (Pjbl) Di Sman I Kota Pasuruan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(1).

Murtadho, M. A. C. (2025). تناوب حروف الجر في القرآن الكريم: أنماطه ودلالاته. Proceedings of International Conference on Islamic Civilization and Humanities, 3, 106–124.

Murtadho, M. A. C., Thohir, M., Yusuf, K., & Rif’at, A. D. (2025). Breaking Language Barriers: Amplifying Arabic Proficiency in Bilingual Environment through Immersive Learning. Insyirah: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Arab Dan Studi Islam, 8(1), 153–171.

Saleh, E. H. (2019). The Effect Of Speech Act Functions On The Development Of Efl Learners’high Order Thinking Skills. International Journal of Technical Research & Science, IV, 24–32.

Searle, J. R. (1969). How to derive ‘ought’from ‘is.’ In The is-ought question: a collection of papers on the central problem in moral philosophy (pp. 120–134). Springer.

Searle, J. R., Kiefer, F., & Bierwisch, M. (1980). Speech act theory and pragmatics (Vol. 10). Springer.

Usman, A. H., Mahmud, A. F., Daud, A., & Dahlan, S. (2020). Language as a social instrument. History of Income Tax, 18(2), 129–143.

Usmani, S., & ALMASHHAM, A. (2024). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Analysing speech acts in different cultures. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 6(1), 186–198.

Verschueren, J. (1985). Principles of pragmatics. Journal of Linguistics, 21(2), 459–470.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). 4-Vygotsky.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-19

Issue

Section

Articles