Interpersonal Communication Across Disciplines: Mapping DeVito's Model in Virtual Higher Education Through Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18326/inject.v11i2.7273Keywords:
Interpersonal Communication, Interdisciplinary Communication Studies, Devito's Communication Model, Virtual Learning, Systematic Literature ReviewAbstract
This study examines DeVito's Interpersonal Communication Model as an interdisciplinary theoretical framework capable of bridging communication studies, educational science, and digital learning discourse. Grounded in the premise that interpersonal communication is the primary determinant of relational quality in technology-mediated environments, this study conducts a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) of national and international journal articles published between 2013 and 2023, sourced from Google Scholar, Scopus, and ERIC. The review maps how DeVito's five core communication dimensions, openness, empathy, supportiveness, positiveness, and equality, are operationalized across disciplinary boundaries, from educational communication and instructional design to digital sociology and health communication. Findings reveal that while these dimensions consistently appear across the reviewed literature as central factors shaping communicative climate, social presence, and relational engagement in virtual classrooms, they are rarely integrated under a unified communication framework. Scholars from different disciplines address the same relational phenomena through divergent vocabularies, social presence, instructor immediacy, and dialogic feedback, without recognizing their shared theoretical foundation in interpersonal communication theory. This study addresses that fragmentation by proposing a conceptual model that repositions virtual learning as a relational communication process, mediated but not determined by technology. The model demonstrates the interdisciplinary reach of DeVito's framework and contributes to the development of an integrated communication paradigm for digital learning environments.
References
Alif, M., & Solihin, O. (2023). LITERATURE REVIEW IN SOCIAL RESEARCH Journal Signal, 11(2).
DeVito, J. A., & DeVito, J. (2019). The interpersonal communication book. Instructor, 1(18), 521–532.
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108.
Kwon, D., Kim, H., Kim, J., Suh, S. C., Kim, I., & Kim, K. J. (2019). A survey of deep learning-based network anomaly detection. Cluster Computing, 22(Suppl 1), 949–961.
Lowenthal, P. R., & Dunlap, J. C. (2018). Investigating students’ perceptions of instructional strategies to establish social presence. Distance Education, 39(3), 281–298.
MacKenzie, A., Bacalja, A., Annamali, D., Panaretou, A., Girme, P., Cutajar, M., Abegglen, S., Evens, M., Neuhaus, F., & Wilson, K. (2022). Dissolving the dichotomies between online and campus-based teaching: a collective response to the manifesto for teaching online (Bayne et al., 2020). Postdigital Science and Education, 4(2), 271–329.
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205–222.
Papaioannou, D., Sutton, A., & Booth, A. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review, 1–336.
Peacock, S., & Cowan, J. (2019). Promoting a sense of belonging in online learning communities of inquiry in accredited courses. Online Learning, 23(2), 67–81.
Perloff, R. M. (2021). The dynamics of political communication: Media and politics in a digital age. Routledge.
Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 25.
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2018). Online course enrollment in community college and degree completion: The tipping point. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(2).
Shehzad, N., & Charles, T. (2023). Exploring the impact of instructor social presence on student engagement in online higher education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep484.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.
Solihin, O., P Lubis, D., Muljono, P., & Amanah, S. (2024). Interpersonal communication approach in addressing TB stigma in Bandung City. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, 12(1), 94–108.
Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 157–190.
Xie, E., Wang, W., Yu, Z., Anandkumar, A., Alvarez, J. M., & Luo, P. (2021). SegFormer: Simple and efficient design for semantic segmentation with transformers. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34, 12077–12090.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 INJECT (Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




