Supervisor-Subordinate Communication and Employee Performance: A Qualitative Case Study

Authors

  • Suryadi Wardiana Universitas Buddhi Dharma
  • Serius Zebua Universitas Buddhi Dharma
  • Adrianus Risda Lega Universitas Buddhi Dharma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18326/inject.v11i2.6801

Keywords:

Supervisor-Subordinate Communication, Relational Mechanism, Work Motivation, Perceived Performance

Abstract

Supervisor-subordinate communication is widely recognized as an important factor in employee motivation and performance. However, many previous studies have examined communication mainly as a general organizational variable, with limited attention to the relational processes through which supervisory communication is interpreted and transformed into motivational and performance-related outcomes. This study examines supervisor-subordinate communication as a relational mechanism in a hierarchical workplace context. In this study, relational mechanism refers to recurring communicative processes through which supervisory messages are interpreted by subordinates as sources of clarity, inclusion, guidance, support, and coordination. Using a qualitative case study design at PT Modella, Indonesia, this study draws on semi-structured interviews, observation, and organizational documentation involving one leadership-level key informant and five employee informants from production, packing, administration, and sales divisions. Thematic analysis identified five relational communication processes: task clarification, dialogic participation, constructive feedback, emotional support, and cross-functional coordination. These processes shaped work motivation by strengthening role certainty, perceived appreciation, psychological safety, learning orientation, and self-confidence. They also contributed to perceived performance through clearer task execution, fewer work errors, faster problem solving, and smoother inter-divisional coordination. The study contributes to organizational communication scholarship by showing that supervisor-subordinate communication influences motivation and perceived performance not only through information transmission but also through employees’ relational interpretation of supervisory interaction. The findings should be understood within the limits of a single qualitative case study and perceived rather than objectively measured performance.

References

Alsharairi, A., Alazzah, M., Safori, A., & Aladwan, M. N. S. (2025). Leadership communication, employee engagement, and online communication behaviors during crises: Evidence from Jordanian universities. Frontiers in Communication, 10, 1713290. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1713290

Ardianto, B. (2023). Effect Of Leader-Member Exchange And Organization Climate Towards Public Sector Employee Performance Mediated By Innovative Work Behavior. 6(2).

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Gazzoli, G., Shabazz, S. M., Arnold, T. J., & Kim, P. B. (2023). Why do frontline employees speak up on behalf of customers? The influence of supervisors versus coworkers and the role of intrapersonal factors. Journal of Business Research, 156, 113514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113514

Ge, Y. (2020). Psychological safety, employee voice, and work engagement. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 48(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.8907

Genç, E. (2024). The Effect of Leader-Member Exchange On Individual Performance Of Logistics Employees And The Mediating Role Of Career Satisfaction. Management, 28(2), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.58691/man/192787

Hu, S., Nadeem, M. A., Luo, J., & Yi, X. (2024). The effects of psychological safety and employee voice behavior on flight attendants’ mindful safety practices adoption. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1398815. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1398815

Jufrizen, J., Harahap, D. S., & Khair, H. (2024). Leader-Member Exchange and Employee Performance: Mediating Roles of Work Engagement and Job Satisfaction. Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura, 26(3), 306–322. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v26i3.3591

Khurohman, A. H. (2024). Crafting Employee Engagement In Public Sector Delayering: From Transparency, Leadership To Trust. 7(3).

Kim, S., Lee, H., & Connerton, T. P. (2020). How Psychological Safety Affects Team Performance: Mediating Role of Efficacy and Learning Behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1581. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01581

Kwon, B., & Farndale, E. (2020). Employee voice viewed through a cross-cultural lens. Human Resource Management Review, 30(1), 100653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.06.002

Latifoglu, N., Imamoglu, S. Z., Ince, H., & Altindag, E. (2023). Effect of Leader–Member Exchange on Proactive Employee Behavior and Employee Performance: The Moderating Role of Innovative Climate. Sustainability, 15(20), 14670. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014670

Mazzei, A., Ravazzani, S., Butera, A., & Fisichella, C. (2025). Do you dare to speak up at work? A study on organizational conditions enabling or discouraging employee voice. Journal of Public Relations Research, 37(1–2), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2024.2412074

Men, L. R., Qin, Y. S., & Jin, J. (2022). Fostering Employee Trust via Effective Supervisory Communication during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Through the Lens of Motivating Language Theory. International Journal of Business Communication, 59(2), 193–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884211020491

Murdiyanto, E. (2020). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat UPN Veteran Yogyakarta.

Nguyen, C. N., Ning, W., Alikaj, A., & Tran, Q. N. (2021). Motivating language and employee outcomes: A multinational investigation. Management Research Review, 44(2), 268–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2020-0071

Priya, A. (2021). Case study methodology of qualitative research: Key attributes and navigating the conundrums in its application. Sociological Bulletin, 70(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920970318

Putri, Y. A., & Fathiyah, K. N. (2025). The effect of leader-member exchange and interpersonal communication on employee job satisfaction. Research Horizon, 5(2), 691–704.

Qin, Y. S., Men, L. R., Akanbi, F., & He, H. (2025). How supervisors’ use of motivating language influences employee attitudes and supportive behaviors: Exploring the moderating effects of remote work. International Journal of Business Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884251349493

Rabiul, M. K., Almaloy, Y., Patwary, A. K., & Salman, A. (2025). Psychological Safety: The Role of Motivating Language, Energies, and Customer Incivility. Howard Journal of Communications, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2025.2597282

Sherren, V., & Indra, R. (2025). Communication, motivation, and employee performance: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan, 13(6), 5685–5694. https://doi.org/10.37641/jimkes.v13i6.4528

Sibunruang, H., & Kawai, N. (2024). The proactive nature of employee voice: The facilitating role of supervisor developmental feedback. Journal of Management & Organization, 30(4), 1100–1118. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2023.38

Siswadi, Y., Farisi, S., Arif, M., & Astuti, R. (2025). Leader-member exchange and employee performance: The mediating role of work engagement and job satisfaction. International Journal of Business Economics, 6(2), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.30596/ijbe.v6i2.23542

Sitepu, T. B., & Husein, A. E. (2025). The effect of communication, teamwork, and work motivation on employee performance at PT X in Batam City. International Journal of Applied Finance and Business Studies, 13(3), 426–434. https://doi.org/10.35335/ijafibs.v13i3.424

Thelen, P. D., Yue, C. A., & Verghese, A. K. (2022). Increasing employee advocacy through supervisor motivating language: The mediating role of psychological conditions. Public Relations Review, 48(5), 102253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102253

Vernanda, A. D. (2022). The Effect Of Leader Member Exchange (Lmx) And Team Member Exchange (Tmx) On Employee Performance Through Affective Commitment At Pt Perkebunan Nusantara X. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 6(1), 539. https://doi.org/10.29040/ijebar.v6i1.4762

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Yue, C. A., Thelen, P., & Verghese, A. K. (2025). Should I Speak Up? How Supervisory Communication, Team Culture, and Team Relationships Determine Employees’ Voice Behavior. International Journal of Business Communication, 62(1), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884221104794

Zhu, C., Zhang, F., Ling, C. D., & Xu, Y. (2023). Supervisor feedback, relational energy, and employee voice: The moderating role of leader-member exchange quality. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(17), 3308–3335. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2119093

Downloads

Published

2026-05-12

How to Cite

Wardiana, S., Zebua, S., & Lega, A. R. (2026). Supervisor-Subordinate Communication and Employee Performance: A Qualitative Case Study. INJECT (Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication), 11(2), 1351–1390. https://doi.org/10.18326/inject.v11i2.6801

Issue

Section

Articles