Government Digital Public Relations Practices in a Culture-Based Smart City: A Qualitative Case Study of Denpasar, Indonesia

Authors

  • Irla Yulia Universitas Terbuka
  • Nurkhalila Fajrini Universitas Terbuka
  • Sri Pujiati Universitas Terbuka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18326/inject.v11i2.6709

Keywords:

Government Digital Public Relations, Government–Public Communication, Smart City, Culture-Based Communication, Qualitative Case Study

Abstract

Smart city development is often dominated by technology-driven approaches that emphasize digital infrastructure and technological efficiency, while overlooking socio-cultural communication processes and government-public relationships. This study aims to analyze the government’s Digital Public Relations (Digital PR) practices in the context of a culture-based smart city in Denpasar, Indonesia. This study employs an interpretive qualitative case study approach through in-depth interviews, observations of the Denpasar City Government’s digital communication platforms, and literature analysis. The findings reveal that the government’s Digital PR practices function not only as mechanisms for disseminating public information and services but also as relational and socio-cultural communication processes through which the government represents cultural identity, negotiates public legitimacy, and shapes communication relationships in the digital public sphere. However, government-public communication in the digital space remains predominantly informative, institutionally controlled, and not yet fully dialogic or participatory. Public participation also remains layered and unevenly distributed due to disparities in digital literacy, socio-cultural communication structures, and unequal participatory capacities among citizens. Furthermore, non-governmental actors such as community intermediaries, tourism stakeholders, alternative digital media, and tourists actively participate in the production, dissemination, and validation of cultural meanings within Denpasar smart city communication ecosystem. Nevertheless, communicative authority and agenda-setting processes remain institutionally centralized, resulting in collaborative yet asymmetrical participation dynamics. Based on these findings, this study proposes a Culture-Based Digital Public Relations Relationship Model. The model emphasizes that effective communication in culture-based smart cities depends not only on technological readiness and digital infrastructure but also on socio-cultural mediation, participatory communication practices, and the government’s ability to accommodate negotiated cultural meanings within hybrid digital public spaces.

References

Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press.

Dijk, J. A. G. M. van. (2005). The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. SAGE Publications.

Eshuis, J., & Klijn, E. H. (2012). Branding in Governance and Public Management (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203145159

Grunig, J. E., & Grunig, L. A. (2008). Excellent Theory in Public Relations: Past, Present, Future. In Public Relations Research (1st ed., pp. 327–347). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226935895_Excellence_Theory_in_Public_Relations_Past_Present_and_Future

Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up?: Intelligent, progressive, or entrepreneurial? City, 12(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810802479126

Isabella, I., & Agustian, E. (2023). Implementing Digital Literacy Policies and the Challenges of Towards a Smart City in Palembang City. Journal of Governance and Local Politics (JGLP), 5(2), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.47650/jglp.v5i2.936

Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.

Johansson, E., & Johansson, K. M. (2025). Normalizing Government Social Media Communication: A Swedish Case Analysis. 13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.10457

Kavaratzis, M. (2004). From city marketing to city branding: Towards a theoretical framework for developing city brands. Place Branding, 1(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.pb.5990005

Kavaratzis, M., & Ashworth, G. J. (2006). City Branding: An effective assertion of identity or a transitory marketing trick? Place Branding, 2(3), 183–194. https://doi.org/doi:10.1057/palgrave.pb.5990056

Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2016). From Homo Economicus to Homo dialogicus: Rethinking social media use in CSR communication. Public Relations Review, 42(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.11.003

Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003

Lovari, A., & Valentini, C. (2020). Public Sector Communication and Social Media: Opportunities and Limits of Current Policies, Activities, and Practices. In V. Luoma‐aho & M. Canel (Eds.), The Handbook of Public Sector Communication (1st ed., pp. 315–328). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119263203.ch21

Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308

Meisari, W. C., Muliawati, & Fatimah, S. (2025). GOVERNMENT INFORMATION CLARITY AND DIGITAL ENGAGEMENT AS DRIVING FORCES BEHIND DIGITAL RESILIENCE ON THE JEPIN SMART CITY PLATFORM. Jurnal Vokasi Indonesia, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.7454/jvi.v13i1.1247

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A., Michael. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publication. https://vivauniversity.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/milesandhuberman1994.pdf

Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital citizenship: The internet, society, and participation. MIT Press.

Nasrullah, R. (2015). Media Sosial: Perspektif Komunikasi, Budaya, dan Sosioteknologi. Simbiosa Rekatama Media.

Rogers, E. M. (2007). Diffusion of Innovations. In Knowledge and Innovation Management (pp. 37–50). Universitat Hohenheim. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Anja_Christinck/publication/225616414_Farmers_and_researchers_How_can_collaborative_advantages_be_created_in_participatory_research_and_technology_development/links/00b4953a92931a6fae000000/Farmers-and-researchers-How-can-collaborative-advantages-be-created-in-participatory-research-and-technology-development.pdf#page=37

Wukich, C. (2021). Government Social Media Engagement Strategies and Public Roles. Public Performance & Management Review, 44(1), 187–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1851266

Downloads

Published

2026-05-23

How to Cite

Yulia, I., Fajrini, N., & Pujiati, S. (2026). Government Digital Public Relations Practices in a Culture-Based Smart City: A Qualitative Case Study of Denpasar, Indonesia. INJECT (Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication), 11(2), 1581–1610. https://doi.org/10.18326/inject.v11i2.6709

Issue

Section

Articles