Secrecy, Power, and Solidarity in Prison Code Language: A Phenomenological Analysis of Female Inmates in Tangerang Womens Correctional Facility
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18326/inject.v11i1.6664Keywords:
Carceral Communication, Collective Resilience, Informal Authority, Interactional Order, Social CohesionAbstract
This article presents the findings of a phenomenological inquiry exploring the life experiences of inmates in the Tangerang Women’s Correctional Facility in using coded language to maintain secrecy, power, and solidarity. Contrary to the traditional view of prisons as static institutions, this study conceptualizes the prison environment as a networked micro-society where language functions as the primary infrastructure for social cohesion. Utilizing Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology of embodiment and Foucault’s analysis of disciplinary power, data are collected through in-depth interviews with ten inmates and five correctional officers. The study discovered communication patterns where inmates actively used coded language to survive, thrive, and maintain social cohesion within the correctional facility. The study also identified specific warning systems, such as a coded greeting that function as counter-surveillance tactics to maintain women’s autonomy in prison, against internal and external control. Furthermore, power is revealed to be negotiated rather than absolute, mediated through inmate team leaders using numerical codes to disclose the high-level authority. By using this coded language, inmates create a strong sense of community and support, turning the sadness of being locked up into a shared strength. This study proves that prison coded language is more than just a way to hide secrets. It is how inmates hold onto their dignity, maintain solidarity, and keep peace in a place where they have no power. The study concludes that secrecy, power, and solidarity are deeply intertwined in prison life. Further study should expand this phenomenology and explore other’s correctional facilities to compare.
References
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Cardozo-Freeman, I. (1984). Language and culture in a maximum security prison. Greenwood Press.
Chamberlen, A. (2018). Embodying Punishment. In Oxford Scholarship Online. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198749240.001.0001
Clemmer, D. (1940). The Prison Community. Christopher Publishing House, Boston.
Comfort, M. (2008). Doing Time Together: Love and Family in the Shadow of the Prison. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Creswell, J.W. & Poth, C.N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. 4th Edition, SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks.
Crewe, B. (2009). Power, adaptation, and social life in an English prison. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crewe, B. (2011). Depth, weight, tightness: Revisiting the pains of imprisonment. Punishment and Society, 13(5), 509–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474511422172
Crewe, B. (2014). Not Looking Hard Enough: Masculinity, Emotion, and Prison Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(4), 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413515829
Cunha, M. (2014). The ethnography of prisons and penal confinement. 122(1995), 25–27.
Drake, D. H., Earle, R. & Sloan, J. (2015). The Palgrave Handbook of Prison Ethnography.
Fontes, A. W. (2023). Carceral community in the time of COVID-19: Isolation, adaptation, and predation. Punishment and Society, 25(4), 1062–1079. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745221129425
Forrest, R. & Kearns, A. (2001). Social cohesion, social capital, and the neighborhood. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2125–2143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120087081
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. (A. Sheridan, Transl.). Random House Vintage Books.Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday-Anchor.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-79, (Ed. Colin Gordon). New York: Pantheon.
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Anchor Books
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma. Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. London: Penguin Books.
Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon Press.
Jewkes, Y. (2005). Men behind bars: “Doing” masculinity as an adaptation to imprisonment. Men and Masculinities, 8(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X03257452
Jewkes, Y. (Ed.). (2012). Handbook on Prisons. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203118191
Kaminski, S. E., Mazumdar, S., DiMento, J. F. C., & Geis, G. (2006). The viability of voluntary visitability: A case study of Irvine’s approach. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 17(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073060170010501
Kojić, B. & Mirić, F. (2025). The right to health care of persons deprived of liberty in penitentiary institutions, with reference to the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. The Right to Health, 607–627. https://doi.org/10.47152/ns2025.31
Kruttschnitt, C. & Gartner, R. (2003). Women ‘ s Imprisonment. Crime and Justice, 30(2003), 1–81.
Middleton, L. (2022). Prisons, Literacy, and Creative Maladjustment: How College-in-Prison Educators Subvert and Circumnavigate State Power. October, 1–24.
Moran, D. (2013). Carceral geography and the spatialities of prison visiting: Visitation, recidivism, and hyperincarceration. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31(1), 174–190. https://doi.org/10.1068/d18811
Moshe, K. D. & Einat, T. (2019). Anaconda, Jet Fuel, White Robes, and Miaow Miaow: The Argot of Women Prisoners. Prison Journal, 99(6), 683–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885519877380
Owen, B. (1998). In the Mix: Struggle and Survival in a Women’s Prison. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Pereira, E. S., Sousa, V. V. & Souza Neto, F. G. de. (2025). As memórias de gírias prisionais: um estudo à luz da sociolinguística. Cadernos Cajuína, 10(4), e1172. https://doi.org/10.52641/cadcajv10i4.1172
Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception. In Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009223416
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W. & Earls, F. (1997). Sanpson, 1997-16021 Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy.
Schept, J. T. (2015). Progressive punishment: Job loss, jail growth, and the neoliberal logic of carceral expansion. New York University Press.
Scott, J. (1990). Domination and the Arts of Resistance. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven.
Simelane, L. (2016). A Case Study of the Linguistic Variety of Women in the Mawelawela Correctional Institution, Swaziland. Linguistics and Literature Studies, 4(2), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.13189/lls.2016.040202
Sykes, G. M. (1958). The society of captives: A study of a maximum security prison. Princeton University Press.
Ugelvik, T. (2014). Power and Resistance in Prison: Doing Time, Doing Freedom. In Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology: Vol. Part F4152. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137307866
van Manen, M. (2017). Phenomenology in Its Original Sense. Qualitative Health Research, 27(6), 810–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317699381
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 INJECT (Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
