Dear Leader!: A Look at (In)directness in Online Complaints in China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v6i1.17-37Abstract
The rise of e-government services has led to an increase in citizens interacting with the government online. However, not much about the nature of citizen complaints on such administrative platforms is known. The few previous studies have shown that due to politeness considerations, Chinese communication is often indirect in power-asymmetrical settings. This study examines citizen complaint posts on an online e-service platform in China, exploring the linguistic directness and politeness of those posts. Using a qualitative method, 300 citizen complaint posts were analyzed, with the findings revealing that: a) traditional markers of politeness were not extensively used in the opening and closing of complaint posts despite their inherently face-threatening nature; b) citizens communicated directly with the government, expressing a high level of directness in complaint posts; c) despite finding (b), complaint components were not in general perceived as impolite. The paper argues that Chinese communication is not always indirect, particularly in online situations where there is a power imbalance. In such cases, citizens sporadically use traditional politeness markers such as politeness strategies, specific types of speech act components, and avoidance of expressions of negative emotions. Interestingly, the study found that citizens focused more on avoiding Component B (i.e. dissatisfaction/disapproval) in complaints and formalizing complaint components, rather than relying on traditional politeness strategies to express politeness. In this online administrative context, direct citizen-to-government (C2G) communication is transaction-oriented and instrumental in nature. This paper provides some insight into Chinese pragmatics and practical guidelines for citizens to make successful and efficient complaints in an online administrative context.
References
Basu, S. (2004). E‐government and developing countries: an overview. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 18(1), 109-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600860410001674779
Beamer, L. (2003). Directness in Chinese Business Correspondence of the Nineteenth Century. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 17(2), 201-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651902250948
Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1984). Requests and Apologies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP)1. Applied Linguistics, 5(3), 196-213. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/5.3.196
Boxer, D. (1993). Social distance and speech behavior: The case of indirect complaints. Journal of Pragmatics, 19(2), 103-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90084-3
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.
Chen, Y.-s., Chen, C.-y. D., & Chang, M.-H. (2011). American and Chinese complaints: Strategy use from a cross-cultural perspective. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2011.012
Dayter, D., & Rüdiger, S. (2014). Speak Your Mind but Watch Your Mouth Complaints in CouchSurfing References. In K. Bedijs, G. Held, & C. Maaß (Eds.), Face Work and Social Media (pp. 193-212). LIT.
Decock, S., & Depraetere, I. (2018). (In)directness and complaints: A reassessment. Journal of Pragmatics, 132, 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.04.010
Decock, S., & Spiessens, A. (2017). Customer complaints and disagreements in a multilingual business environment. A discursive-pragmatic analysis. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2017-0004
Depraetere, I., Decock, S., & Ruytenbeek, N. (2021). Linguistic (in)directness in twitter complaints: A contrastive analysis of railway complaint interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 171, 215-233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.026
Ding, D. D. (2006). An Indirect Style in Business Communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 20(1), 87-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651905281051
Distelhorst, G., & Fu, D. (2019). Performing Authoritarian Citizenship: Public Transcripts in China. Perspectives on Politics, 17(1), 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592718004024
Edwards, D. (2005). Moaning, whinging and laughing: the subjective side of complaints. Discourse Studies, 7(1), 5-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605048765
Fukushima, S. (2000). Requests and Culture. Politeness in British English and Japanese. Peter Lang.
Gao, H. (1999). Features of request strategies in Chinese. Lund University, Department of Linguistics.
Gu, Y. G. (1990). Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 237-257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082-O
Han, R., & Shao, L. (2022). Scaling Authoritarian Information Control: How China Adjusts the Level of Online Censorship. Political Research Quarterly, 75(4), 1345-1359. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129211064536
House, J., & Kasper, G. (2011). Politeness Markers in English and German. In C. Florian (Ed.), Volume 2 Conversational Routine (pp. 157-186). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/9783110809145.157
Ide, S. (1989). Formal forms and discernment: two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness. Multilingua, 8(2-3), 223-248. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.223
Jin, M., & Yuan, Z. M. (2020). On Complaints of Chinese Online Shopping Ｒeviews. Foreign Language Research(215). https://doi.org/10.16263/j.cnki.23-1071/h.2020.04.002
Kádár, D. Z. (2007). Terms of (im)politeness: A study of the communicational properties of traditional Chinese (im)polite terms. Eötvös Löránd University.
Kádár, D. Z., & House, J. (2021). ‘Politeness Markers’ Revisited - A Contrastive Pragmatic Perspective. Journal of Politeness Research, 17(1), 79-109. https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/pr-2020-0029
Kádár, D. Z., & Pan, Y. (2011). Politeness in China. In D. Z. Kádár & S. Mills (Eds.), Politeness in East Asia (pp. 125-146). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511977886.008
Leech, G. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001
Li, F., Liu, Y., & Meng, T. (2019). Discursive strategy of opinion expression and government response in China: Text analysis based on online petitions. Telematics and Informatics, 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.06.001
Liu, W., Li, L., & Ren, W. (2021). Variational pragmatics in Chinese social media requests: The influence of age and social status. Journal of Pragmatics, 178, 349-362. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.002
Locher, M. A., & Watts, R. J. (2005). Politeness Theory and Relational Work. 1(1), 9-33. https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9
Mason, A. J., & Carr, C. T. (2021). Toward a Theoretical Framework of Relational Maintenance in Computer-Mediated Communication. Communication Theory, 32(2), 243-264. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaa035
Meinl, M. E. (2013). Electronic complaints : an empirical study on British English and German complaints on eBay. Frank & Timme
Meng, T. G. (2019). Responsive Government: The Diversity and Institutional Performance of Online Political Deliberation Systems. Social Sciences in China, 40(4), 148-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2019.1674041
Migdadi, F., Badarneh, M. A., & Momani, K. (2012). Public Complaints and Complaint Responses in Calls to a Jordanian Radio Phone-in Program. Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 321-341. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams011
Pan, Y. L. (2000). Facework in Chinese service encounters. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 10, 25-61.
Pan, Y. L., & Kádár, D. n. (2011). Politeness in historical and contemporary Chinese. Continuum.
Pan, Y. L., & Kádár, D. Z. (2011). Historical vs. contemporary Chinese linguistic politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(6), 1525-1539. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.018
Ren, W., & Fukushima, S. (2022). Perception and evaluation of requests on social media in Chinese and Japanese. Language & Communication, 87, 231-243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.09.002
Ruytenbeek, N., Decock, S., & Depraetere, I. (2022). Experiments into the influence of linguistic (in)directness on perceived face-threat in Twitter complaints. Journal of Politeness Research-Language Behaviour Culture https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2019-0042
Ruytenbeek, N., Decock, S., & Depraetere, I. (2023). Experiments into the influence of linguistic (in)directness on perceived face-threat in Twitter complaints. Journal of Politeness Research, 19(1), 59-86. https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/pr-2019-0042
Ruytenbeek, N., Verschraegen, M., & Decock, S. (2021). Exploring the impact of platforms' affordances on the expression of negativity in online hotel reviews. Journal of Pragmatics, 186, 289-307. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.004
Scollon, R., & Wong-Scollon, S. (1991). Topic confusion in English-Asian discourse. World Englishes, 10, 113-125.
Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press.
Su, Z., & Meng, T. (2016). Selective responsiveness: Online public demands and government responsiveness in authoritarian China. Social Science Research, 59, 52-67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.04.017
Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage pragmatics: Requests, complaints, and apologies. Mouton de Gruyter.
Tsai, L. L., & Xu, Y. (2017). Outspoken Insiders: Political Connections and Citizen Participation in Authoritarian China. Political Behavior, 40(3), 629-657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9416-6
Van Herck, R., Decock, S., & Fastrich, B. (2022). A unique blend of interpersonal and transactional strategies in English email responses to customer complaints in a B2C setting: A move analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 65, 30-48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.08.001
Vásquez, C. (2011). Complaints online: The case of TripAdvisor. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(6), 1707-1717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.007
Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511615184
Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (1991). Politeness and Forms of Address. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 10(3), 145-168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x91103001
Wu, X., & Fitzgerald, R. (2021). ‘Hidden in plain sight’: Expressing political criticism on Chinese social media. Discourse Studies, 23(3), 365-385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445620916365
Xu, P., Johnson, K., & Rundlett, A. (2022). E-participation in contemporary China: A comparison with conventional offline participation. Chinese Public Administration Review, 13(3), 150-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/15396754221107115
Yuan, Z. M. (2009). Lun Hanyu Zhijie Baoyuan Yu [On Direct Complaints in Chinese]. Yuyan Wenzi Yingyong [Applied Linguistics], 1(6), 48-59.
Yuan, Z. M., & Zhu, Y. (2007). A comparative study of complaining strategies between Chinese and American university students. Journal of Xi’an International Studies University, 15(4), 34-38.
Yule, G., & Brown, G. (1983). Introduction: linguistic forms and functions. In Discourse Analysis (pp. 1-26). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511805226.003
Zhan, W., & Bai, X. (2016). Sentence types. In C.-R. Huang & D. Shi (Eds.), A Reference Grammar of Chinese (pp. 401-450). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139028462.015
Zhang, Y. Y. (1995). Indirectness in Chinese requesting. In G. Kasper (ed.). In G. Kasper (Ed.), Pragmatics of Chinese As Native and Target Language (pp. 69-118). Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii.
Zhou, L., & Zhang, S. (2018). Reconstructing the Politeness Principle in Chinese: A response to Gu’s approach. Intercultural Pragmatics, 15(5), 693-721. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2018-0024
Zhou, L., & Zhang, S. J. (2022). An Experimental Pragmatic Study of Gradability of Negative Implicature and ( Im) politeness in Rhetorical Questions. Journal of Foreign Languages, 45(1), 25-35.
Zhou, S. J. (2016). An Analysis of Impoliteness in Online Institutional Complaints. Journal of Xi’an International Studies University 24(3), 56-60.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ridwan Wahid, Shiying Zhao
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS RESEARCH agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
