The The Pragmatics of Provocation: A Forensic Linguistic Study of Religious Hate Speech in Contemporary Islamic Digital Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v8i2.740-767Keywords:
Forensic Linguistics; Provocation; Hate Speech; Pragmatics; Digital Islamic DiscourseAbstract
This study aims to analyze the forms, pragmatic functions, and provocative strategies of religion-based hate speech in contemporary digital Islamic discourse through a forensic linguistic approach. The study employed a qualitative method with a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) research design. The data consisted of 30 units of digital utterances collected from social media posts, online comments, and discussion forums containing indications of religion-based hate speech. Data were selected through purposive sampling based on the presence of negative labeling, collective accusations, calls for exclusion, delegitimization, and identity polarization. The analysis focused on speech acts, implicatures, presuppositions, politeness violations, perlocutionary effects, and rhetorical strategies of provocation. The findings reveal that online comments constituted the most dominant data source, accounting for 14 cases (46.67%). Representative speech acts were the most frequently identified category, comprising 11 cases (36.67%), indicating that provocation was predominantly constructed through claims, accusations, and negative evaluations directed at targeted groups. Among the pragmatic features, perlocutionary effects were the most prevalent (30.00%), while delegitimization emerged as the most common rhetorical strategy (23.33%). The study demonstrates that religious hate speech is not always expressed through overtly offensive or abusive language; rather, it often operates through implicit meanings, the construction of prejudice, and appeals for social exclusion.
References
Alrefaee, Y. M. H. A., & Pasaribu, G. R. (2025). Hate speech on TikTok: A forensic linguistic study. JELIM: Journal of Education, Language, Social and Management, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.65787/jelim.v3i2.617
Anggrayni, O. D., Pratita, I. I., & Nasrullah, R. (2025). Sacred symbols and hate speech: A forensic-pragmatic study of Panji Gumilang’s discourse. Al-Lisan: Jurnal Bahasa (e-Journal), 10(2), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.30603/al.v10i2.6392
Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia. (2024, February 7). APJII jumlah pengguna internet Indonesia tembus 221 juta orang. https://apjii.or.id/berita/d/apjii-jumlah-pengguna-internet-indonesia-tembus-221-juta-orang
Auli, R. C. (2024, January 16). Pasal 28 ayat (2) UU ITE 2024 yang menjerat penyebar kebencian SARA. Hukumonline. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/pasal-28-ayat-%282%29-uu-ite-2024-yang-menjerat-penyebar-kebencian-sara-lt65a6950b71ccc/
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage.
Cambridge University Press.
Coulthard, M., & Johnson, A. (Eds.). (2010). The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics. Routledge.
Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge University Press.
Fahdiyansyah, M. F., & Susiati, S. (2024). Sociopragmatic analysis of hate speech in Hilarion Heagy’s conversion news on Twitter. Celtic: A Journal of Culture,
English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 11(1), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.22219/celtic.v11i1.30432
Fitriyah, T. (2022). Expressive speech act in comments on Instagram BBC News Indonesia. Al-Bayan: Jurnal Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab.
Gibbons, J., & Turell, M. T. (Eds.). (2008). Dimensions of forensic linguistics. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
Hamzah, G., Muttaqin, A., Irsad, M., & Larhzizer, F. (2025). Evolving dynamics of moderate Islamic discourse on Indonesian social media. Fikri: Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial dan Budaya, 9(2), 410–424. https://doi.org/10.25217/jf.v9i2.5149
Hannan, A., & Mursyidi, A. F. (2023). Social media and the fragmentation of religious authority among Muslims in contemporary Indonesia. Digital Muslim Review, 1(2), 84–104. https://doi.org/10.32678/dmr.v1i2.10
Harahap, Y. S., & Siregar, N. (2022). A forensic linguistic approach to interpreting a hate speech case on social media. VISION, 18(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.30829/vis.v18i1.1414
Kalaman, S. (2024). Religious hate speech against Islam in Bollywood cinema in the context of self-orientalism: The example of “The Kerala Story”. Medya ve Din Araştırmaları Dergisi (MEDİAD), Special Issue 1, 69–90. https://doi.org/10.47951/mediad.1488057
Kastolani, K. (2020). Understanding the delivery of Islamophobic hate speech via social media in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 10(2), 247-270.
Katuuk, N. N. C., Wantasen, I. L., & Imbang, D. (2024). Analysis digital track of hate speech on Instagram using a forensic linguistic. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan,
Bahasa, dan Sastra, 10(4), 3847–3854. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v10i4.4439
Kheryadi, K., & Chorbwhan, R. (2025). Muslim digital identities in Indonesia and Thailand: Social media, authority, and cultural belonging. Digital Muslim Review, 3(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.32678/dmr.v3i1.41
Kubangun, N. A., Kubangun, M. T., & Noya, A. (2025). Polemic of religious intolerance among Indonesian users on YouTube. JSW (Jurnal Sosiologi Walisongo), 9(2), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.21580/jsw.2025.9.2.25590
Martutik, M., Santoso, A., Rani, A., Prastio, B., & Maulidina, A. (2024). Exploring flaming in the discourse of negative judgment: Invoked strategies used by Indonesian netizens in Instagram comments. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), 2333601. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2333601
Nor, M. W. M., & Gale, P. (2021). Growing fear of Islamisation: Representation of online media in Malaysia. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 41(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2021.1903161
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2012). Rabat Plan of Action on the prohibition of advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence. https://www.ohchr.org/en/freedom-of-expression
Rachman, A., Saumantri, T., & Hidayatulloh, T. (2025). Transformation of religious authority in the digital era: A post-normal times analysis by Ziauddin Sardar on the phenomenon of social media da’wah. Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah, 45(1), 107–
https://doi.org/10.21580/jid.v45.1.25644
Republik Indonesia. (2024). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2024 Nomor 1.
Rostiawati, T., Aliyah, R. N., Mubarok, Y., & Iskandari, Y. (2024). Ujaran kebencian terhadap artis pada kolom komentar Instagram. Disastra: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 6(2), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.29300/disastra.v6i2.3462
Saidin, M. I. S., & Azrun, N. (2024). Digital media and religious sentiments in Malaysia: Critical discourse analysis of Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party and Democratic Action Party cyberspace campaigns in the 15th general election. Religions, 15(8), 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15080920
Salendra, I. W. (2024). Religious moderation in digital media discourse: A study of the nu.or.id portal from the perspective of communicative rationality. Fikri: Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial dan Budaya, 9(2), 200–220. https://doi.org/10.25217/jf.v9i2.4954
Sari, P. L. P., Supiatman, L., & Aryni, Y. (2022). Hate speech acts on social media: Forensic linguistics study. English Teaching and Linguistics Journal (ETLiJ),
(2). https://doi.org/10.30596/etlij.v3i2.10437
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
Syahid, A., Sudana, D., & Bachari, A. D. (2021). Hate speech and blasphemy on social media in Indonesia: Forensic linguistic studies. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Indonesian Linguistics Society (KIMLI 2021) (pp. 1–5). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211226.001
Tabaika, M. A., Barizi, A., & Arif, Y. M. (2025). Digital da’wah and the reconstruction of Islamic authority. Al-Balagh: Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi, 10(2), 371–
https://doi.org/10.22515/albalagh.v10i2.12116
Zamri, N. A. K., Mohamad Nasir, N. A., Hassim, M. N., & Ramli, S. M. (2023). Digital hate speech and othering: The construction of hate speech from Malaysian perspectives. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 10(1), 2229089. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2229089
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mu' aliyah Hi Asnawi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS RESEARCH agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Indonesian Pragmatics Association
