Distribution of Patriarchal Ideology In the Khilma Anis’s Novel Hati Suhita: A Semiotic Study of Weeb Keane's Ideology

Authors

  • Taswirul Afkar Indonesian Language Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Islam Majapahit, Mojokerto 61315, Indonesia
  • Wawan Hermawan Indonesian Language Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Islam Majapahit, Mojokerto 61315, Indonesia
  • Wiwik Mardiana English Language Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Islam Majapahit, Mojokerto 61315, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v8i1.459-482

Abstract

This study examines Khilma Anis's novel Hati Suhita through the lens of semiotic ideology as outlined by Webb Keane. Semiotic ideology involves people's core assumptions about signs, their functions, and potential impacts. The research aims to uncover how signs within the novel depict patriarchal systems in pesantren families and highlight women's acts of resistance. Employing a qualitative methodology with a Peircean semiotic framework, informed by semiotic ideology, the findings indicate that: (1) the tradition of arranged marriages acts as a signifier representing patriarchal dominance in pesantren households; (2) the husband's silence and refusals symbolize naturalized masculine authority; (3) the determination and escape of the female character to her mother symbolize resistance to patriarchal dominance; and (4) a tension exists between semiotic ideologies of pesantren traditions and individual female agency. This research offers insights into how pesantren literature both reproduces and questions social power structures through signs.

References

Amna, A. (2018). Otoritas Kharismatik Dalam Perkawinan: Studi atas Perjodohan di Pondok Pesantren Al-Ma’sum Tempuran, Magelang. Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 11(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2018.11108

Bartky Lee, S. (1990). Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression. Routledge.

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice (R. Nice, Ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Stanford University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine Domination. Stanford University Press.

Damayanti, D., & Rismaningtyas, F. (2021). Pendidikan Berbasis Responsif Gender Sebagai Upaya Meruntuhkan Segregasi Gender. Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi, 10. https://doi.org/10.20961/jas.v10i0.47639

Eliya, I., Lida, U. M., Nurpadillah, V., Rachman, A. K., & Nuthihar, R. (2024). Intertekstualitas dalam Novel “Hati Suhita” Karya Khilma Anis. JENTERA: Jurnal Kajian Sastra, 13(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.26499/jentera.v13i1.5522

Endraswara, S. (2008). Metodologi penelitian sastra. Media Pressindo.

Fauzi, A., Kholifah, S., & Fitrianita, T. (2019). Pengetahuan sebagai alat kuasa penundukan santri. 1(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.34199/OH.1.1.2019.002

Fitri Pebriaisyah, Bz., Wilodati, W., & Komariah, S. (2022). Kekerasan Seksual di Lembaga Pendidikan Keagamaan: Relasi Kuasa Kyai Terhadap Santri Perempuan di Pesantren. SOSIETAS, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.17509/sosietas.v12i1.48063

Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=AVzuf-r22eoC

Hardiasari, S. A. P., Sagita, Y., Fadhila, N., Sulistyawati, T. G., Utomo, A. P. Y., Neina, Q. A., & Kesuma, R. G. (2024). Implikatur Percakapan dalam Film “Hati Suhita” Adaptasi Novel Karya Khilma Anis. Student Scientific Creativity Journal, 2(5), 26–51. https://doi.org/10.55606/sscj-amik.v2i5.3962

Hellwig, T. (2011). Abidah El Khalieqy’s novels: Challenging patriarchal Islam. Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde, 167(1), 16–30.

Huppatz, K. (2009). Reworking Bourdieu’s `Capital’: Feminine and Female Capitals in the Field of Paid Caring Work. Sociology, 43(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508099097

Ismah, N. (2011). The New Generation of Women Writers from the Pesantren Tradition in Indonesia. Explorations: A Graduate Student Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 11, 105–120.

Istiqlaliyani, F. (2022). Ulama Perempuan di Pesantren: Studi Tentang Kepemimpinan Nyai Hj. Masriyah Amva. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 8, 104–109. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v8i1.1670

Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with Patriarchy. Gender and Society, 2(3), 274–290.

Keane, W. (2003a). Semiotics and the social analysis of material things. 23(3–4), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00010-7

Keane, W. (2003b). Semiotics and the social analysis of material things. Language & Communication, 23(3), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00010-7

Keane, W. (2018). On Semiotic Ideology. Signs and Society, 6(1), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1086/695387

Kholilurrohman, M., Biroli, A., Dzulkarnain, I., & Sari, Y. W. (2025). Peran Pengurus Senior Dalam Membangun Kepatuhan Santri Dipondok Pesantren Madura. DIKSI: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Sosial, 6, nomor 3, 356–365. https://doi.org/10.53299/diksi.v6i3.2023

King, A. (2004). The Prisoner of Gender: Foucault and the Disciplining of the Female Body. 5.

Kurniawati, A., & Muafiah, E. (2023). Kesetaraan dan Keadilan Gender dalam Lingkungan Pesantren. Excelencia: Journal of Islamic Education & Management, 3, 25–36. https://doi.org/10.21154/excelencia.v3i01.1478

Mahmood, S. (2012). Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. In Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvct00cf

McCall, L. (1992). Does genderfit? Bourdieu, feminism, and conceptions of social order. Theory and Society, 21(6), 837–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992814

Muzakka, M., & Suyanto, S. (2020). The Gender Equality Struggles in The Novel of Perempuan Berkalung Sorban and Gadis Pantai. Jurnal Poetika, 8(2), 194. https://doi.org/10.22146/poetika.v8i2.60528

Oktaviani, I., Elanda, Y., Alie, A., & Prastiyo, E. B. (2024). Pendidikan Inklusif Gender sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Kekerasan Seksual di Pondok Pesantren. Sosiologi USK, 18(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.24815/jsu.v18i1.39499

Peirce, C. S. (1940). Philosophical writings of Peirce. Dover Publications.

Rahma, E. W., Muyassaroh, U. N., & Bahiyyah, A. S. F. (2022). Analisis Nilai Moral Pada Tokoh Utama Wanita Dalam Novel Cahaya Cinta Pesantren Karya Ira Madan. Edukasiana: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 1(3), 152–157. https://doi.org/10.56916/ejip.v1i3.146

Rahman, Y. (2017). Feminist Kyai, K.H. Husein Muhammad: The Feminist Interpretation on Gendered Verses and the Qur’ān-Based Activism. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 55(2), 293–326. https://doi.org/10.14421/AJIS.2017.552.293-326

Rinaldo, R. (2014). Pious and Critical: Muslim Women Activists and the Question of Agency. Gender and Society, 28(6), 824–846.

Setiawan, I. (2024). Moral Wewayangan pada Novel Hati Suhita Karya Khilma Anis. Jurnal Guru Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.51817/jgi.v3i2.718

Short, T. L. (2007). Peirce’s Theory of Signs. Cambridge University Press.

Wardany, I., Nisak, R., Khoiriyah, S., & Lestari, E. (2024). Peran Tokoh Perempuan Pada Film Hati Suhita (The Role Of Female Characters In The Movie Hati Suhita). Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pembelajarannya, 14, 335. https://doi.org/10.20527/jbsp.v14i2.19369

Downloads

Published

2026-02-20

How to Cite

Afkar, T., Hermawan, W., & Mardiana, W. (2026). Distribution of Patriarchal Ideology In the Khilma Anis’s Novel Hati Suhita: A Semiotic Study of Weeb Keane’s Ideology. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 8(1), 459–482. https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v8i1.459-482