Defamatory Speech Acts on Social Media: A Forensic Pragmatics Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v8i1.219-241Abstract
This study aims to analyze defamatory speech acts on social media from a forensic pragmatics perspective using a documentation study method. The research is grounded in the growing number of cases involving utterances that damage the reputation of individuals or groups through digital platforms such as Instagram, Twitter/X, TikTok, and YouTube. The research data were obtained from digital documentation in the form of posts, comments, and screenshots, supported by scholarly literature and relevant legal decisions. The analysis was conducted by identifying types of speech acts (locutionary, illocutionary, perlocutionary), communication contexts, and reputational effects based on Austin and Searle’s speech act theory. The findings indicate that the most dominant forms of speech acts in defamation cases are illocutionary assertives (43.34%) and expressive acts (40%), typically manifested as accusations, insults, or insinuations that harm a person’s reputation. However, given the complex and multimodal nature of online discourse often infused with cultural implicatures, irony, and digital semiotics the classical speech act framework may not be sufficient to capture the full pragmatic meaning. Therefore, integrating complementary approaches such as the appraisal system, stance analysis, or multimodal pragmatics can provide a more nuanced understanding of evaluative positioning, affective stance, and meaning construction in social media interactions. The forensic pragmatics analysis also reveals that indirect speech acts often carry the same legal consequences as explicit utterances, depending on the context, speaker's intention, and public perception. Digital traces (screenshots, metadata, comments, and reposts) are shown to function as linguistic forensic evidence in legal proceedings. The study concludes that the forensic pragmatics approach is effective for analyzing defamatory utterances, as it enables the simultaneous assessment of linguistic, contextual, and legal dimensions. The study recommends collaboration among linguists, law enforcement, and policymakers in developing guidelines for addressing defamation cases on social media.
References
Abdullah, M., Djou, D. N., & Kau, M. U. (2025). Ujaran Kebencian Netizen Pendukung Anies terhadap Prabowo di Media Sosial X Kajian Pragmatik Linguistik Forensik. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Dan Riset Pendidikan, 4(1), 2675–2684.
Adelawati, M., & Arimi, S. (2025). Tindak Tutur Tidak Literal pada Pelanggaran UU ITE dalam Kasus Lina Mukherjee: Analisis Linguistik Forensik. Semantik, 14(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.22460/semantik.v14i1.p113-126
Arika, N., Aswari, A., & Saputra, I. E. (2025). Criminal Law Enforcement On the Role of Social Media in Cases of the Spread of Hoaxes and Slander. Horizon Public Legal Studies, 1(2).
Asis. (2024). Legal Protection for Defamation Suspects Who Spread Facts on Social Media Reviewed from the ITE Law. The Journal of Socio-Legal and Islamic Law, 3(1), 15–21.
Damaiyanti, M., Yulastri, D., Martini, Kemal, E., & Song, D. (2024). The Key Factors of Project-Based Learning Implementation on Higher Education: A Discourse Analysis Point of View. Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia Volume, 10(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.22202/jg.v10i1.7931
Fernando, E., & Setiawan, T. (2024). Forensic Linguistics: Speech Acts of Defamation on Social Media. Formosa Journal of Sustainable Research (FJSR), 3(12), 2543–2554.
Fitria, T. N. (2024). Forensic Linguistics: Contribution of Linguistics in Legal Context. Prasasti: Journal of Linguistics, 9(1), 118–134.
Floranti, A. D. (2022). Racism Toward Chinese Ethnic Group in Indonesian Social Media: Hate Speeches Analysis from Forensic Linguistic Perspective. Jomantara: Indonesian Journal of Art and Culture, 2(2), 112–130.
Hadi, W., Ginting, P. P., & Perangin-angin, R. B. B. (2024). Forensic Linguistics Analysis of Speech Has Legal Effect in Social Media in The Region of North Sumatera. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Innovation in Education, Science, and Culture (ICIECS 2023). https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.24-10-2023.2342106
Herlina, S. (2025). Criminal Defamation Through Social Media and Its Legal Implications in Indonesia. International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources, 5(2), 110–125.
Hidayatillah, A., Subyantoro, S., & Haryadi. (2021). Types of Defamation Speech Acts on social media Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook in 2017-2019. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 10(2), 150–159.
Jumiati, R., Musfiroh, T., & Setiawan, T. (2025). Forensic Linguistic Study on Cases of Hate Speech on Social Media. IJFL (International Journal of Forensic Linguistic), 5(1), 1–6.
Katuuk, N. N. C., Wantasen, I. L., & Imbang, D. (2024). Analysis Digital Track of Hate Speech on Instagram Using a Forensic Linguistic. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Sastra, 10(4), 3847–3854.
Medeline, F., Rusmiati, E., & Ramadhani, R. H. (2022). Forensik Digital dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian di Media Sosial. PAMPAS: Journal Of Criminal Law, 3(3), 310–325.
Naqisa, Z. I., & Fadillah, D. (2024). The communication style of Habib Jafar’s da’wah on TikTok social media. Journal of Social Studies (JSS), 20(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.21831/jss.v20i2.73842.117-132
Pretorius, K. (2024). A Simple and Systematic Approach to Qualitative Data Extraction From Social Media for Novice Health Care Researchers: Tutorial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 8. https://doi.org/10.2196/54407
Rachmad, R. N., & Milal, A. D. (2023). A Forensic Linguistic Study: Hate Speech Towards Indonesian Badminton Athletes on Social Media. Pioneer: Journal of Language and Literature, 15(1), 33–49.
Sari, M. P. D., Pastika, I. W., & Satyawati, M. S. (2025). Ujaran Kebencian terhadap Selebgram Azizah Salsha di Media Sosial Tiktok: Kajian Linguistik Forensik. Kulturistik: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Budaya, 9(2), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.22225/kulturistik.9.2.12631
Vidhiasi, D. M., Saifullah, A. R., Bachari, A. D., Indonesia, U. P., Saifullah, A. R., Indonesia, U. P., Bachari, A. D., & Indonesia, U. P. (2023). The Evaluation of Alleged Defamation: A Forensic Linguistics Analysis. Al-Lisan: Jurnal Bahasa (e-Journal), 8(2), 139–153.
Widodo. (2024). Restorative Justice in Criminal Defamation on Social Media: A Legal Perspective and Implementation in Indonesia. Awang Long Law Review, 6(2), 443–452.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 MU'ALIYAH HI ASNAWI ASNAWI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS RESEARCH agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Indonesian Pragmatics Association
