Discursive Sovereignty: How China Constructs Hong Kong as an “Internal Affair”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v8i1.116-137Keywords:
Critical Discourse Analysis, political discourses, National Security Law, British National (Overseas), Sino-British Joint DeclarationAbstract
This study examines the discursive construction of sovereignty in Hong Kong through a critical discourse analysis of political speeches, legal documents, and press releases spanning from the 1984 Sino-British negotiations to the post-2020 National Security Law era. The research aims to investigate how the totalitarian party-state in China legitimizes its authority over Hong Kong while simultaneously ignoring forms of British nationality held by Hongkongers, and how democratic states, particularly the United Kingdom, respond through visa and asylum pathways. Using a qualitative methodology grounded in Critical Discourse Analysis, the study traces the historical and ideological roots of the narrative of “internal affairs” as constructed through key state discourses and examines how these discourses intersect with concepts of self-determination, civic participation, and legal frameworks. The findings reveal that China employs a combination of hegemonic persuasion and institutional control to frame Hongkongers’ political aspirations as illegitimate, while international responses reflect broader tensions between democratic protection and authoritarian compliance. The research highlights the ongoing contestation of norms surrounding sovereignty, rights, and freedom, illustrating how Hong Kong has become a frontline in the global struggle between democratic and authoritarian discourses. The study concludes that understanding these dynamics provides insight into the mechanisms through which states assert power, control narratives, and shape transnational perceptions of legitimacy, with implications for both international relations and civic activism.
References
BBC News. (2023, January 2). BBC jì lù piàn: xiāng gǎng de zì yóu zhī zhàn (xià) [BBC documentary: Hong Kong’s fight for freedom (2nd episode)] [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DB4QnUc0FBU&t=2930s
Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Bureau of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China. (1984a). The Joint Declaration. https://www.cmab.gov.hk/en/issues/jd2.htm
Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Bureau of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China. (1984b). The Joint Declaration Memoranda (Exchanged Between the Two Sides). https://www.cmab.gov.hk/en/issues/jd6.htm
Deng, X. (1994). Selected works of Deng Xiaoping volume III (1982-1992). (The Bureau for the Compilation and Translation of Works of Marx, Engles, Lenin and Stalin Under the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, Trans.). Foreign Language Press.
Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and power (3. ed. ed.). Routledge.
Flowerdew, J. (1997). The discourse of colonial withdrawal: A case study in the creation of mythic discourse. Discourse & Society, 8(4), 453-477. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008004002
Flowerdew, J. (2004a). The discursive construction of a world-class city. Discourse & Society, 15(5), 579-605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504045033
Flowerdew, J. (2004b). Identity politics and Hong Kong’s return to Chinese sovereignty: Analysing the discourse of Hong Kong’s first chief executive. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(9), 1551-1578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.03.002
Flowerdew, J. (2011). Critical discourse analysis in historiography: The case of Hong Kong's evolving political identity (1st ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230336841
Flowerdew, J. (2016). A historiographical approach to Hong Kong Occupy. Journal of Language and Politics, 15(5), 529-548. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.5.02flo
Flowerdew, J. (2017). Understanding the Hong Kong umbrella movement. Discourse & Society, 28(5), 453-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517710991
Flowerdew, J., & Leong, S. (2007). Metaphors in the discursive construction of patriotism: The case of Hong Kong's constitutional reform debate. Discourse & Society, 18(3), 273-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507075476
The Government of the HKSAR. (2021a). The Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China. https://www.basiclaw.gov.hk/filemanager/content/en/files/basiclawtext/basiclaw_full_text.pdf
The Government of the HKSAR. (2021b). CE statement on NPC's deliberation on improving HKSAR electoral system to implement “patriots administering Hong Kong”. https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/202103/05/P2021030500393.htm
Grant, A. (2018). Doing excellent social research with documents: Practical examples and guidance for qualitative researchers (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315177274
In victory speech, Hong Kong chief executive-elect Carrie Lam vows to heal divisions, reach out to young. (2017, March 26). SCMP. https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/2082224/victory-speech-hong-kong-chief-executive-elect-carrie-lam
Lee, K., & Law, K. (2016). Hong Kong Chinese “orientalism”: Discourse reflections on studying ethnic minorities in Hong Kong. In A. Pratt (Ed.), Ethnic minorities: Perceptions, cultural barriers and health inequalities (pp. 81-116). Nova Science Publishers.
Leung, J. H. C. (2024). Sedition or mere dissent? Linguistic analysis of a political slogan. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law = Revue Internationale De Sémiotique Juridique, 37(2), 647–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10042-x
Lin, Y., Chen, M., & Flowerdew, J. (2022). 'Same, same but different': representations of Chinese mainland and Hong Kong people in the press in post-1997 Hong Kong. Critical Discourse Studies, 19(4), 364–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2021.1905015
Ng, T. W. C. (2020). Recontextualisation of Beijing’s voice: A critical discourse analysis of hegemony and resistance in Hong Kong political discourse. Discourse & Society, 31(5), 540-561. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520914683
Statham, S. (2022). Critical discourse analysis: A practical introduction to power in language. Routledge.
Tang, A. (2022). The parasites of language. Language and Dialogue, 12(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00110.tan
Tang, W. (2014). (Re) imaginings of Hong Kong: Voices from the Hong Kong diaspora and their children. Journal of Chinese Overseas, 10(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1163/17932548-12341275
Tuck, E. & Yang, K.W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1-40. https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/des/article/view/18630
Wang, J. (2017). Discursive strategies and identity construction: A study based on the PAs of the HK governments pre- and post-transition. Jinan University Press.
Wodak, R., & Fairclough, N. (2010). Recontextualizing European higher education policies: The cases of Austria and Romania. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(1), 19-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900903453922
Wong, K. H. (2024). From mass protests to national security: A critical analysis of Carrie Lam’s political responses during the 2019 Hong Kong protests. Journal of Postcolonial Linguistics, 10, 1-25. https://iacpl.net/jopol/issues/journal-of-postcolonial-linguistics-10-2024/from-mass-protests-to-national-security/
Wong, K. H. (2025a). A Critical EAP perspective on “Glory to Hong Kong”: Language, identity, and resistance. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 8(2), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v8i2.14037
Wong, K. H. (2025b, September 5). Five years on, the National Security Law exposes the Joint Declaration’s deception. CAS Commentary Board. https://doi.org/10.52698/LCFO2938
Wong, K. H. (2025c, September 30). Is patriotism just obedience? Hong Kong under the National Security Law. E-International Relations. https://www.e-ir.info/2025/09/30/is-patriotism-just-obedience-hong-kong-under-the-national-security-law/
Wong, K. H. (2025d). Liberate Hong Kong? Language, agency, and imagining political futures. Teaching English as a Foreign Language Journal, 4(2), 84-96. In press. https://doi.org/10.12928/tefl.v4i2.1705
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ka Hang Wong
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS RESEARCH agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Indonesian Pragmatics Association
