Technology-Assisted Informal Pragmatic Learning Among EFL Learners: Awareness, Speech Acts, And AI Tools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v8i1.22-45Keywords:
pragmatic awareness, EFL learners, AI tools; informal learning, speech actsAbstract
In today’s digitally connected world, developing pragmatic competence is essential for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. This competence encompasses both pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic abilities, which are critical for using language appropriately across diverse contexts. This study explores how EFL learners informally develop pragmatic competence through digital and AI-assisted learning outside formal classroom settings. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, data were collected from 20 purposively selected Indonesian EFL learners through questionnaires and interviews. The study investigates three dimensions: learners’ pragmatic awareness and practices, types of speech acts acquired informally, and the digital tools they employ. Findings reveal that learners show a notable awareness of context-sensitive and polite language use, which is often shaped by repeated exposure to digital content. Commonly acquired speech acts include polite requests, expressions of gratitude, and compliments—frequently encountered in online media. In contrast, more complex acts such as refusals and complaints were less frequently acquired, suggesting limited exposure and the need for deeper sociopragmatic engagement. Learners demonstrated proactive engagement with digital platforms, highlighting the mediating role of technology in informal pragmatic development. Tools such as ChatGPT were valued for their dialogic simulation and personalized feedback, while Grammarly assisted with tone adjustment in written communication. Although digital tools enhance pragmatic awareness, their effectiveness in fostering sociocultural sensitivity appears limited without reflective guidance. This study underscores the need for pedagogical scaffolding to complement informal, AI-assisted learning environments.
References
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics. Language Learning, 49(4), 677–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00105
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2013). Developing L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, 63(s1), 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00738.x
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic vs. grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 32(2), 233–259. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587583
Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Billups, F. D. (2020). Qualitative data collection tools: Design, development, and applications. SAGE Publications.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Butarbutar, R. (2024). Artificial intelligence for language learning and teaching: A narrative literature study. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 12(1). https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/englisia/article/view/23211
Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing and research. Cambridge University Press.
Ellet, W. (2018). The case study handbook: A student’s guide (2nd ed.). Harvard Business Press.
Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Gerring, J. (2017). Case study research: Principles and practices (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Using mobile technology to develop language skills and cultural understanding. Language Learning & Technology, 22(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10125/44682
Godwin-Jones, R. (2021). Messaging, meaning, and culture: Language learning in the age of AI. Language Learning & Technology, 25(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10125/44713
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
Hockly, N. (2018a). Automated writing evaluation for informal learning. ELT Journal, 72(3), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy009
Hockly, N. (2018b). AI in language learning. ELT Journal, 72(4), 455–459. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy034
Hockly, N. (2018c). Automated writing evaluation: The influence of Criterion on student writing. TESOL Journal, 9(4), 845–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.392
Hui, X., Liu, Z., & Chi, Y. (2024). A systematic review on technology-based instructions to develop English pragmatic competence for non-native speakers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(5), 3587–3598. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i5.28385
Hui, Y., Taguchi, N., & Lee, J. (2024). Technology-enhanced learning and L2 pragmatics: A systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1912100
Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A. D. (2010). Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet. Pearson Education.
Kasper, G. (1997). Can pragmatic competence be taught? NetWork, 6, 1–9.
Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Blackwell.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000335
Loewen, S., Isbell, D. R., & Sporn, Z. (2020). The effectiveness of app-based language instruction for developing receptive linguistic knowledge and oral communicative ability. Foreign Language Annals, 53(2), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12457
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Muir, P. Y., & Xu, Z. (2011). Exploring pragmatic failure into the writing of young EFL learners: A critical analysis. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 254–261. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n4p254
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
Qi, X., & Chen, Z. (2025). A systematic review of technology integration in developing L2 pragmatic competence. Education Sciences, 15(2), 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020172
Qiao, H., & Zhao, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence-based language learning: Illuminating the impact on speaking skills and self-regulation in Chinese EFL context. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1255594. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1255594
Schmidt, R. (1993a). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206–226. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500002476
Schmidt, R. (1993b). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1–63). University of Hawai‘i.
Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
Siregar, A., Arini, T., Siregar, P. F., Siahaan, M. H. A., & Siregar, D. Y. (2024). Pragmatic failures and their consequences in the EFL classroom. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(3), 50916–50922. http://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/24001
Taguchi, N. (2011). Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000018
Taguchi, N. (2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instruction has been and where it should go. Language Teaching, 48(1), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000263
Taguchi, N. (2018). Second language pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.91
Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38–67. https://doi.org/10125/25201
Wang, S., & Vásquez, C. (2012). Web 2.0 and second language learning: What does the research tell us? CALICO Journal, 29(3), 412–430. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.29.3.412-430
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dewi Cahyaningrum, Sri Haryati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS RESEARCH agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Indonesian Pragmatics Association
