Metaphorical Euphemisms in Dholuo Marriage Conflict Resolution Program ‘Dak Man Gi Ndhadhu’ on Radio Nam Lolwe
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v8i1.1-21Keywords:
Euphemism, Metaphorical euphemism, Categorization, Dholuo Marriage conflic resolution, Radio Nam LolweAbstract
This paper investigates the Marriage Conflict Resolution (MCR) discourse among Dholuo speakers, which is full of taboo words, particularly those with sexual connotations and other obscenities. The purpose is to examine the use of metaphorical euphemisms by interlocutors to enhance the comprehension of ideas and to politely avoid taboos for culturally acceptable communicative purposes. The study employs a cognitive linguistics approach to analyze these metaphorical euphemisms. Using a descriptive research design, data are collected through Key Informant Interviews and a digital corpus from the Dholuo marriage conflict resolution program Dak Man Gi Ndhadhu on Radio Nam Lolwe, a vernacular station for Dholuo speakers broadcasting in Kisumu County, Kenya. The Metaphor Identification Procedure Vrije Universiteit (MIPVU) is employed to interrogate whether the expressions and lexical items identified are metaphorical. The items are then transcribed and translated into English.The study findings show that MCR metaphorical euphemisms are conceptualized through the interlocutors’ experiences, such as actions, organisms, food, body parts, journeys, objects, human beings, and nature. The findings indicate that Dholuo speakers effectively apply their understanding of these concepts to enhance their comprehension of marital issues. The study focuses solely on the cognitive-linguistic processes underlying metaphorical euphemism and not on gender-based perspectives. The study concludes that Dholuo speakers conceptualize MCR issues through metaphorical euphemisms to avoid taboo language.
References
Aberra, D. (2006). Prototype theory in cognitive linguistics.
Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge University Press.
Anudo, C. N. (2018). Conceptual metaphors in Dholuo: A cognitive linguistic approach (Doctoral dissertation, Kisii University).
Anudo, C. N., & Kodak, B. (2017). A Conceptual Analysis of Love Metaphors in Selected Dholuo Popular Music..
Cellyne, A. N. (2014). A cognitive linguistic analysis of sexual dysphemisms and euphemisms in South Nyanza Dholuo.
Cohen, B., & Murphy, G. L. (1984). Models of concepts. Cognitive science, 8(1), 27- 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(84)80024-5
Deluz, A. (1968). BA Ogot, History of the Southern Luo. Vol. I: Migration and settlement, 1500-1900. Homme, 8(1), 91-92.
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2018). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Routledge.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2008). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. Basic books.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2003). Conceptual blending, form and meaning. Recherches en communication, 19, 57-86.
Faycel, D. (2012). Food metaphors in Tunisian Arabic proverbs. Working Papers in Linguistics, 3.
Gathigia, M. G. (2014). Metaphors of love in Gikũyũ: Conceptual mappings, vital relations and image schemas. Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Gibbs, R. W. (1992). Categorization and metaphor understanding.
Gibbs Jr, R. W., & Chen, E. (2017). Taking metaphor studies back to the Stone Age: A reply to Xu, Zhang, and Wu (2016). Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(1), 117-124. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2017-0005
Greenberg, J. H. (1963). The languages of Africa. International journal of American linguistics.
Goldstone, R. L., Kersten, A., & Carvalho, P. F. (2003). Concepts and categorization. Comprehensive handbook of psychology, 4, 599-621.
Holdaway, T. (2024). Categories and Concepts. Principals of Psychology-PS200.
Johnson, M. (2007). The meaning of the body. In Developmental perspectives on embodiment and consciousness (pp. 35-60). Psychology Press.
Johnson, M. (2013). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago press.
Kovecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford university press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press.
Lakoff, G. (1987). The death of dead metaphor. Metaphor and symbol, 2(2), 143- 147.
Lakoff, George (2008). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago press. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0202_5
Njoroge, R. N. (2014). Euphemisms and taboo words: A case of Kikuyu’s Kabete dialect (Doctoral dissertation).
Mudogo, B. (2019). Conceptualization of women through metaphor by bilingual Lukabras-English speakers. Conceptualization of Women through Metaphor by Bilingual Lukabras-English Speakers International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation (IJLLT), 2, 26-32. 10.32996/ijllt.2019.2.5.4
Muriithi, G. N. (2016). The Phonological and Lexical variation within Kisumu-South Nyanza dialect of Dholuo (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi).
Nyarumba, D. M., Mudogo, B., & Mandillah, L. (2024). Metaphorical Euphemisms in Ekegusii Circumcision Songs. Journal of African Languages & Literary Studies, 5(1), 69.
Ochieng Orwenjo, D., & Anudo, C. A. (2016). A cognitive linguistic approach to Dholuo sexual euphemisms and dysphemisms. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 3(2), 316-346.
Ochieng, J. J. (2016). A linguistic analysis of the metaphorical Euphemisms used in Dholuo HIV. AIDS Discourse.
Oduol, J. H. (1990). Dholuo dialects: Synchronic state and some historical inferences (Doctoral dissertation).
Owuor, V. B. (2006). Resurrection hope in the African context: Challenging Luo beliefs and practices concerning death (Doctoral dissertation, North-West University).
Rosch, E. (2009). Categorization. In Cognition and pragmatics (pp. 41-52). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive psychology, 8(3), 382-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010- 0285(76)90013-X
Smith, E. R., & Zarate, M. A. (1990). Exemplar and prototype use in social categorization. Social cognition, 8(3), 243-262.
Statistics, K. N. B. O. (2019). The 2009 Kenya population and housing census. Nairobi: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics.
Ungerer, F., & Schmid, H. J. (2013). An introduction to cognitive linguistics. Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Benard Mudogo, Owino, Miriti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS RESEARCH agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
