Turn-Taking Mechanism and Power Relations in United States Presidential Debates between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris on September 11, 2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v7i2.437-457Keywords:
Conversation Analysis, Power Relation, Presidential Debate, Turn-Taking MechanismAbstract
This research aims to examine the Turn-Taking Mechanism and Power Relations that emerged in the 2024 United States Presidential Debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. This research uses a qualitative method with the theory of Turn-Taking Mechanism proposed by Jacob L Mey and Michel Foucault’s theory of power, which places power as something that is spread in a network of social relations and manifested through language. Turn-Taking Mechanism in political debates serves as an important mechanism to reveal the dynamic of power relations between candidates. Data were obtained from official transcripts and video recordings on the ABC News debate YouTube Channel, then analyzed to identify patterns of the Turn-Taking Mechanism, such as Taking the Floor, Holding the Floor, and Yielding the Floor. The analysis showed that the Turn-Taking Mechanism in this debate was not as orderly as it should be in cooperative communication. Through Foucault’s candidate perspective, power relations in this debate can be seen through the way candidates organize and distribute discourse in the public communication space. The research also found that moderator interventions, which aim to maintain the rules of Turn-Taking in the course of the debate, were often undermined by the candidates’ discursive power practices, thus showing that power in debates is fluid, resistive and constantly shifting depending on the dynamic of interaction. Moreover, this research is expected to contribute to the development of Linguistic studies, especially Pragmatics in the field of politics, as well as explore further the relation between discourse analysis and power relations.
References
Aisyah, S. (2021). Conversation Analysis Of Turn Turn-Taking Mechanism In Ever AfterMovie. LANGUAGE HORIZON: Journal of Language Studies, 9(2).
Akmal, H., Syahriyani, A., & Handayani, T. (2022). Request Speech Act of Indonesia English Learners and Australian English Speakers Through Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Perspectives. LEARN Journal: Language and Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(2), 498-520.
Alqatawna, M., & Quba, A. A. (2024). Press Conference Debates: A Conversational Analysis Study. World Journal of English Language, 14(3), 73-86.
Aryanti, M. L., Yuliawati, S., Ekawati, D., & Darmayanti, N. (2024). The Use of Turn Taking in the 2020 US Presidential Debate: A Conversation Analysis Study. Diglosia, 7(3), 511-520.
Ashidiq, Y. A. (2022). Turn-Taking Strategies of Conversation in Warren Edward Buffet Interview on Squawk Box Business News. BRIGHT Journal of English Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature, 5(1), 40-51.
Benoit, W. L. (2014). Political Election Debates: Informing Voters about Policy and Character. Lexington Books.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.
Branham, R. J. (1991). Debate and Critical Analysis: The Harmony of Conflict. L. Erlbaum Associates.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.
Edelman, M. J. (1971). Politics as Symbolic Action: Mass Arousal and Quiescence. Academic Press.
Fahri, A., & Rosida, I. (2023). Gender and Power Relations in Aisha Saeed’s Amal Unbound. Muslim English Literature, 2(1), 11-22. : https://doi.org/10.15408/mel.v2i1.29294
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and Power. Longman.
Foucault, M. (2003). Society must be defended : lectures at the Collège de France, 1975-76 (M. Bertani, A. Fontana, F. Ewald, & D. Macey, Eds.; D. Macey, Trans.). Allen Lane.
Habibi, F., Hidayat, D. N., & Alek. (2020). Turn-Taking in Mata Najwa Talk Show Ragu-Ragu Perpu Episode: A Conversational Analysis. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 2(1), 80-97.
Hayashi, M. (2013). The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (J. Sidnell & T. Stivers, Eds.). Wiley.
Hussein, A. M. (2020). Turn-Taking and Gender Dominance Issue. International Journal Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 10(2), 172-177.
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications. Wiley.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Liddicoat, A. (2007). An Introduction to Conversation Analysis. Continuum.
Mey, J. (2001). Pragmatics: An Introduction. Wiley.
Nasira, N., Syahriyani, A., & Abdurrosyid. (2025). The Depiction Of Putin's Power and Dominance in Political Cartoons about Russia-Ukraine War. Buletin Al-Turas, 31(1), 95-110.
Nawawi, H. (1995). Metode penelitian bidang sosial. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Rahayu, E. S. (2023). Evaluating Power and Status in Turn-Taking Mechanism in Insight with Desi Anwar Talk Show. English Education Journal, 13(1), 20-28.
Rieke, R. D., Sillars, M. O., & Peterson, T. R. (2012). Argumentation and Critical Decision Making. Pearson.
Rivai, N. T. (2019). Turn-Taking Strategies Produced by Male and Female Presenters in American TV Shows. Lexicon, 6(2), 228-237.
Rohmah, Z., & Suwandi, A. F. (2021). Donald Trumps and Hillary Clinton's Interruptions in Presidential Debates. JEELS: Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies, 8(1), 97-118.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735.
Sari, C. C. (2020). Conversation Analysis: Turn-Taking Mechanism and Power Relation in Classroom Setting. Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature, & Linguistics, 7(2), 118-136. https://doi.org/10.22219/celtic.v7i2.12598
Schubert, C. (2019). "Ok, well, first of all, let me say...' Discursive uses of response initiators in US presidential primary debates. Sage Journal, 21(4), 438-457.
Seuren, L. M., Wherton, J., Greenhalgh, T., & Shaw, S. E. (2021). Whose turn is it anyway? Latency and the organization of turn-taking in video-mediated interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 172, 63-78.
Sinaga, Y. K., Tannuary, A., & Saputra, N. (2021). Turn-Taking Strategies Analysis in Conversation between President Jokowi and Boy William in Nebeng Boy Youtube Channel. Linglit Journal, 2(3), 91-102.
Stenstrom, A.-B. (2014). An Introduction to Spoken Interaction. Taylor & Francis.
Subuki, M., Akmal, H., & Hudaa, S. (2023). Identity and Piety: Critical Discourse Analysis on Indonesian Ulema Council's Fatwa About The Law Using Non-Muslim Religious Attributes. AHKAM, 23(2), 423-448.
Tabassum, A., & Hafeez, D. M. R. (2023). Turn Taking Strategies and Gender: A Conversation Analysis of Pakistani Politicians in TV Shows. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 7(1), 399-413.
Taboada, M. (2006). Spontaneous and non-spontaneous Turn-Taking. Pragmatics, 16(2), 329-360.
Wasito, H. (1992). Pengantar metodologi penelitian: buku panduan mahasiswa. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: A Comparative and Critical Introduction. SAGE Publications.
Yule, G. (2018). Pragmatik. Pustaka Pelajar.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Padma Dewi Kalingga Putri, Hilmi Akmal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS RESEARCH agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
