Conversational Incongruity and Humor in Facebook Memes: A Pragmatic Study of Online Language Use

Authors

  • Hasbiya Miryami Jundiyaturrahman UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
  • Hilmi Akmal UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia
  • M Agus Suriadi UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Sholikatus Sa’diyah UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v7i2.458-482

Keywords:

Cooperative Principle, Implicature, humor, incongruity, meme

Abstract

Memes serve not only as entertainment but also as linguistic texts that reflect how humor is pragmatically constructed. This study examines how humor is generated through the creation of implicatures in conversational memes by analyzing the flouting of Grice’s Cooperative Principles, particularly the maxim of relation. Qualitative research is conducted through the analysis of selected memes from the English Memes Facebook page from 2023 to 2024. The research applies Gricean pragmatics alongside Ritchie’s Incongruity Theory to interpret how conversational expectations are deliberately disrupted to produce humorous effects. Findings reveal that flouting the maxim of relation is the most prevalent, followed by quality and quantity, indicating that intentional irrelevance effectively creates incongruity and implicature. By extending Grice’s framework into digital discourse, this study contributes to the broader field of digital humanities, offering insight into the linguistic mechanisms underlying humor in online meme culture.

References

Angesti, W., & Meilasari, P. (2021). the Study of Implicature and Humorous Devices of Dark Memes. Humaniora Scientia: Online Journal on Linguistics, 07(1), 2355–5742. www.reddit.com.

Attardo, S. (2003). Introduction: The pragmatics of humor. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(9), 1287–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00178-9

Bai, Y. (2011). Incongruity-resolution in English humor. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(1), 83–86. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.1.83-86

Creswell, John W.; Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications.

Crystal, D. (2004). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics (Vol. 80, Issue 1). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2004.0038

Dawkins, R. (2006). The Selfish Gene. In Practical Neurology (Vol. 17, Issue 3). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1136/practneurol-2017-001645

du Preez, A., & Lombard, E. (2014). The role of memes in the construction of Facebook personae. Communicatio, 40(3), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2014.938671

Graesser, A. C. (1988). Wit and Humor in Discourse Processing. Discourse Processes, 11(1), 35–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538809544690

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In M. L. Geis, P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics Volume 3: Speech Acts (Vol. 60, Issue 5/6, p. 301). New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/324613

Hamza, H. Q., & Yunus, L. L. (2022). Implicature In Internet Memes: A Cyberpragmatic Approach. International Journal of Early Childhood …, October. https://doi.org/10.9756/INTJECSE/V14I5.774

Handayani, T., Rohmah, T. Y., Lestari, R. D., & Azzahra, F. (2022). Identity Construction of the New Face of Social Justice Warrior on Indonesian Twitter Users. International Journal of Media and Information Literacy, 7(2), 422–433.

Hay, J. (2001). The pragmatics of humor support. Humor, 14(1), 55–82. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.14.1.55

Holmes, J. (2000). Politeness, Power and Provocation: How Humour Functions in the Workplace. Discourse Studies, 2(2), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445600002002002

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.

Lymarev, A. (2023). The Secret Third Thing: A Pragmatic Analysis of Post-irony and Post-ironic Internet Memes The Secret Third Thing A Pragmatic Analysis of Post-irony and Post-ironic Internet Memes.

Malik, A., & Zahra, T. (2022). Pragmatic Analysis of Internet Memes on Distant Learning. Pjsel, 8(2), 2523–1227.

Martin, R. A., & Ford, T. E. (2018). The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach. Oxford: Elsevier Academic Press.

Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An Introduction. Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429451072-1

Morreall, J. (1982). Taking Laughter Seriously. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 11, Issue 1). State University of New York Press.

Raskin, V. (1985). SEMANTIC MECHANISMS OF HUMOR. D. Reidel.

Ritchie, G. (1997). Developing the Incongruity-Resolution Theory. 1976.

Ross, A. (2005). The language of humour. In Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203984567

Stankić, D. P. (2022). Multimodal Humour at Play. University of Novi Sad.

Suriadi, M. A. (2019). The Language of Hoax: Explosive Growth of Fake News in the Biggest Muslim Society. 2nd Internasional Conference on Culture and Language in Southeast Asia (ICCLAS 2018), 75–78.

Syahriyani, A., Fahri, A., Putratama, M. R., & Amaliyah, M. (2022). Squid game series as social phenomenon on Twitter: A study of participatory culture. International Journal of Media and Information Literacy, 7(2), 578–588.

Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics (Issue 112). Routledge.

Wasito, H. (1993). PENGANTAR METODOLOGI PENELITIAN: Buku Panduan Mahasiswa. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Yule, G. (2018). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316779194.021

Zakky, A., Mukhtarom, A., & Susilo, P. (2019). Twitter: Among humor, religious, and political issues in Indonesia. 6th International Conference on Community Development (ICCD 2019), 47–49.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-04

How to Cite

Jundiyaturrahman, H. M., Akmal, H., Suriadi, M. A., & Sa’diyah, S. (2025). Conversational Incongruity and Humor in Facebook Memes: A Pragmatic Study of Online Language Use. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 7(2), 458–482. https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v7i2.458-482

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Pragmatics Research

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Hasbiya Miryami Jundiyaturrahman, Hilmi Akmal, M Agus Suriadi, Sholikatus Sa’diyah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

License and Copyright Agreement

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS RESEARCH agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.