A Politeness and Expressive Acts in Diplomatic Discourse: A pragmatic Analysis of Marape’s 2024 Address to the Australian Parliament

Authors

  • Stephanie Yakumbu Department of Language and Literature Education, Faculty of Language and Arts, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Riki Nasrullah Department of Language and Literature Education, Faculty of Language and Arts, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Ina Ika Pratita Department of Language and Literature Education, Faculty of Language and Arts, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v7i2.368-383

Keywords:

diplomatic discourse, politeness strategies, Expressive Acts, Postcolonial Pragmatics, Papua New Guinea

Abstract

This study examines the pragmatic strategies of politeness and expressive acts in Prime Minister James Marape’s historic 2024 address to the Australian Parliament. It focuses on how language is used to perform diplomacy, assert postcolonial identity, and reaffirm regional presence. The research aims to explore how speech acts particularly those expressing gratitude, acknowledgment, and storytelling serve not only interpersonal but also symbolic and ideological functions in high-level diplomatic discourse. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach, the study is grounded in Brown and Levinson’s politeness theory and informed by postcolonial pragmatics. Selected excerpts from the speech were analyzed for their pragmatic density and thematic relevance. The findings show that Marape employs positive politeness to foster solidarity and shared authority, negative politeness to express humility while affirming legitimacy, and off-record strategies especially narrative storytelling to reclaim historical voice. Expressive acts such as environmental imagery and geographic reframing reinforce Papua New Guinea’s national identity and geopolitical stance while maintaining diplomatic decorum. The analysis reveals that politeness in postcolonial diplomatic settings functions as a complex communicative strategy that negotiates power, history, and cultural dignity. This study contributes to the expanding field of postcolonial pragmatics by offering a Pacific perspective and illustrating how diplomatic speeches can serve as performative acts of historical redress and regional engagement.

References

REFERENCES

Al-Hamzi, A. M. S., Nababan, M., Santosa, R., & Anis, M. Y. (2024). Socio-pragmatic analysis of utterances with polite addressing terms: translation shift across Arabic-English cultures. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2359764

Anwar, M., Amir, F. R., Zuhriyah, S. A., Purabsari, R., & Rosa, H. . (2024). LINGUISTIC IMPOLITENESS IN MEMES DURING THE 2024. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12(4), 1899–1912. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i4.12801

Brammer, C. (2006). Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice (review). Language, 82(3), 674–675. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0117

Brown, P. (2015). Politeness and Language. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition (Second Edition, Vol. 18). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.53072-4

Gufron, M., Muh, J., & Azizurrohman, A. (2023). A PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS OF BROWN AND LEVINSON’S POLITENESS STRATEGIES IN PRESIDENT JOKO WIDODO’S INTERNATIONAL SPEECHES Moh. Gufron. Linguistics and English Languages Teaching Studies, 4(1), 18–27.

Gurevich, L. (2022). Expressive Speech Acts in Political Discourse: An Integrative Approach Perspective. Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences, 5(2), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.33422/jarss.v5i2.783

Levisen, C., & Sippola, E. (2020). Place, Pragmatics and Postcolonial Discourse. Journal of Postcolonial Linguistics, 2, 1–7. https://iacpl.net/jopol/issues/journal-of-postcolonial-linguistics-22020/place-pragmatics-and-postcolonial-discourse/

Muhassin, M. (2021). a Critical Discourse Analysis of a Political Talk Show on the 2019 Indonesian Presidential Election. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 14(2), 21–50. https://doi.org/10.24042/ee-jtbi.v14i2.10604

Mühlenbernd, R., Wacewicz, S., & Żywiczyński, P. (2021). Politeness and reputation in cultural evolution. Linguistics and Philosophy, 44(6), 1181–1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-020-09315-6

Nugrahanto, A. D., & Hartono, R. (2020). Politeness Strategies in Lecturer-Students Classroom Interaction at the Biology Class Sanata Dharma University. 443(Iset 2019), 727–731. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200620.148

Prayitno, H. J., Kusmanto, H., Nasucha, Y., Rahmawati, L. E., Jamaluddin, N., Samsuddin, S., & Ilma, A. A. (2019). The Politeness Comments on The Indonesian President Jokowi Instagram Official Account Viewed From Politico Pragmatics and The Character Education Orientation in The Disruption Era. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 1(2), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v1i2.8785

Rabab’ah, G., Hussein, A., & Jarbou, S. (2024). Hate Speech in Political Discourse. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 2237–2256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-024-10158-8

Rajik, J. A. (2025). Politeness Strategies in Political Discourse: A Study through the Lens of Brown and Levinson’s Politeness Theory. 3426. https://doi.org/10.32996/jpda

Sadeghoghli, H., & Niroomand, M. (2016). Theories on Politeness by Focusing on Brown and Levinson’s Politeness Theory. International Journal of Educational Investigations Available Online @ Www.Ijeionline.Com, 2016(2), 26–39. www.ijeionline.com

Vica, G. A., Pratama, H., & Rustipa, K. (2023). Off-Record Politeness Strategies and Different Gender’s Characteristics in Woman at Point Zero Novel. English Education Journal, 13(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v13i1.72196

ZHAN, K. (2024). Negative Politeness. The Strategies of Politeness in the Chinese Language, 4(3), 41–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.14904984.7

Downloads

Published

2025-08-10

How to Cite

Yakumbu, S., Nasrullah , R., & Pratita , I. I. (2025). A Politeness and Expressive Acts in Diplomatic Discourse: A pragmatic Analysis of Marape’s 2024 Address to the Australian Parliament. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 7(2), 368–383. https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v7i2.368-383