Functional Pragmatic Analysis in Building Students' Contextual Understanding of Literary Works

Authors

  • Rahayu Kuswardani universitas negeri surabaya
  • Muhaimin Abdullah universitas negeri surabaya
  • Rizky Ramadhan universitas negeri surabaya
  • Fithriyah Inda Nur Abida universitas negeri surabaya
  • Risman Iye universitas iqra buru

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v6i2.277-292

Keywords:

Functional pragmatics, literary analysis, literature education, critical thinking skills.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role of a functional pragmatic approach in developing students' contextual understanding of literary works. The functional pragmatic approach emphasizes the importance of context in interpreting text meaning, considering the social, cultural, and situational backgrounds that influence communication in literature. In literature education, this method helps students go beyond understanding the literal content of a text. It encourages them to explore the deeper layers of meaning by considering the relationship between the author, the reader, and the broader societal context in which the text was produced. The research employs a qualitative case study design, engaging literature students as participants to examine how this approach is implemented in real classroom settings. The study utilizes several data collection techniques, including observations, interviews, and document analysis. These methods allow the researcher to comprehensively understand how the functional pragmatic approach is applied during literature lessons and its impact on students' comprehension. The findings indicate that this approach significantly enhances students' ability to critically analyze the meaning of texts and deepen their understanding of the social and cultural contexts embedded in the literature.Additionally, it fosters an appreciation for the values and messages conveyed through literary works. The study's implications suggest that incorporating a functional pragmatic approach in literature instruction could powerfully support the development of students' contextual understanding and critical thinking skills. By emphasizing the importance of context in literary analysis, this approach can help students engage with texts on a deeper level, making literature more meaningful and relevant to their lives.

References

Ahimsa-Putra, H. S. (2012). Strukturalisme Levi-Strauss: Mitos dan Karya Sastra. Yogyakarta: Kepel Press.

Ahyar, Juni. 2019. Apa itu Sastra: Jenis-Jenis Karya Sastra dan Bagaimanakah Cara Menulis dan Mengapresiasi Sastra. Yogyakarta: Deepublish Publisher

Baker, C. (2006). Postcolonial Literatures: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Bennett, A., & Royle, N. (2004). An Introduction to Literature, Criticism and Theory. London: Routledge

Caulfield, J., (2024). How to write a literary analysis essay | A step-by-step guide. [online] Scribbr. Available at: <https://www.scribbr.com/academic-essay/literary-analysis/> [Accessed 15 October 2024]

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Darma, Y. A. (2014). Analisis Wacana Kritis dalam Multiperspektif. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Dickens, Charles. (1861). Great Expectations. London: Chapman and Hall.

Eagleton, T. (2008). Literary Theory: An Introduction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Endraswara, S. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Widyatama.

Griffith, Kelley. (2022). Writing Essays about Literature. University of North California. USA: Thomson Heinle.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.

Iser, W. (1978). The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Khoirul, W.I., (2021). Pendekatan pragmatik dalam novel negeri para bedebah karya Tere

Kustyarini. 2014. Sastra dan Budaya. LIKHITAPRAJNA. Jurnal Ilmiah.Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan ISSN: 1410-8771. Volume. 16, Nomor 2, hal 1-13

Lazar, G. (2023). Literature and Language Teaching: A Guide for Teachers and Trainers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Liye. Jurnal Metalingual Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia. (Volume 6 No. 1). https://journal.trunojoyo.ac.id/metalingua/article/view/10546

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Moody, H. L. B. (2003). Approaches to the Study of Literature in English as a Foreign Language. London: Longman.

Mu’in, F. (2017). Literature as media for developing language competence and building social awareness. LET: Linguistics, Literature and English Teaching Journal, 3(1), 1-10.

Ramadhana, Rizka Norsy., Eka Puteri Elyani.,Fatchul Mu’in. (2022). Student Critical Thinking Skills Through Literary Analysis. Stilistika: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra P-ISSN: 1978-8800, E-ISSN: 2614-3127 http://journal.um-surabaya.ac.id/index.php/Stilistika/index Vol. 15 No. 2, Juli 2022, hal 279-292

Suwondo, T. (2016). Pragmatisme Pascakolonial (Trilogi Gadis Tangsi dalam Tarigan).

Tarigan, H. G. (2015). Pengajaran Pragmatik. Bandung: Penerbit Angkasa.

Tung, C. A., & Chang, S. Y. (2009). Developing critical thinking through literature reading. Feng Chia Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 19(1), 287-317

Wellek, R., & Warren, A. (1990). Teori Kesusastraan (Trans. Melani Budianta). Jakarta: Gramedia.

Yanti, C. H., & Neisya, N. (2021). Kemampuan Menganalisis Unsur Intrinsik Karya Sastra. Jurnal Ilmiah Bina Edukasi, 14(1), 69-80.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-13

How to Cite

Rahayu Kuswardani, Muhaimin Abdullah, Rizky Ramadhan, Abida, F. I. N., & Iye, R. (2025). Functional Pragmatic Analysis in Building Students’ Contextual Understanding of Literary Works. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 6(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v6i2.277-292