The Use of Politeness Strategies in Academic Conversations as Represented in a Corpus Linguistics MOOC
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v5i1.85-106Keywords:
pragmatics; cooperative principle; politeness strategies; sociolinguistics; social interaction.Abstract
Although politeness strategies are widely used in various types of conversations, e.g., formal emails, business, hotel conversations, movies, and others, few works have dealt with politeness strategies in academic conversations. This study attempts to shed light on the use of politeness strategies in academic conversations and to relate these strategies to the relationship between the interlocutors: whether they have the same specialization or not. The study mainly draws on Brown and Levinson's positive politeness strategies and applies them to conversations. The data was collected by downloading conversations from a MOOC entitled "Corpus Linguistics: methods, analysis, interpretation," created by a team of corpus linguists at Lancaster College. It applies both a quantitative and qualitative approach to analyze the strategies. The results show that exaggeration tops the list of strategies with 23 utterances (23.5%) when the interlocutors have the same specialization. This indicates that each scholar has distinctive insights that another scholar only appreciates with the same specialization. When interlocutors have different specializations, the hierarchy of politeness strategies differs, albeit to some extent. Expressions of approval ranked first, with 11 expressions (25.0%). This indicates that a scholar with little knowledge about a branch of knowledge almost agrees with the specialized speaker.
References
Almoaily, M., & Riyadh, D. (2018). Greetings as a politeness strategy in EFL distance learning students' Official Emails. Linguistics and Literature Studies, 6(6), 259-266. https://doi.org/10.13189/lls.2018.060601
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crystal, D. (1995). The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language. The United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
------------ (1997). A Dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. (4th ed.). Great Britain: Blackwell Publishers Ltd
Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eelen, G. (2001). A critique of politeness theories. Manchester: St. Jerome.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Speech Acts [Syntax and Semantics 3], Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan (eds), 41-58. New York: Academic Press.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (1997). A multilevel approach in the study of talk-in-interaction. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication Of The International Pragmatics Association (Ipra), 1-20. doi: 10.1075/prag.7.1.01ker
Leech, G. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
Mansoor, I. (2018). Politeness: Linguistic study. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 8 (IV, Oct-Dec), 167-179.
Nurdiyani, N. and Sasongko, S. (2022). Students' politeness to lecturers in WhatsApp application measured using leech maxim. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 4(1), pp. 107–121. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v4i2.107-121.
Ruhi, S. (2015). Exploring (im)politeness in specialized and general corpora. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publ.
Sadeghogh, H.li and Niroomand, M. (2016). Theories on politeness by focusing on Brown and Levinson's politeness Theory. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 3(2), pp. 26–39.
Scovel, T. (1998). Psycholinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tamra (2018). The strategies of politeness on offer refusals used by Buginese. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/q73hu.
Tanck, S. (2002). Speech act sets of refusal and complaint: A comparison of native and non-native English-speakers' production. AU Tesol Working Papers, 2, pp. 1–22. Available at: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17606/M6XQ04.
Yang, W. (2015). Using metaphors as politeness strategies in Chinese business negotiations. Journal Of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 5(1), pp. 13-135. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v5i1.113
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Mohamed Arafa Hilal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS RESEARCH agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
