Persuasive Communication in Digital Philanthropy: Bridging the Zakat Intention-Behavior Gap on Instagram

Authors

  • Agustin Santriana Wijayant Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Asep Suryana Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Hadi Suprapto Arifin Universitas Padjadjaran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18326/inject.v11i2.6877

Keywords:

Digital Persuasive Communication, Visual Social Proof, Social Media Campaigns, Philanthropy, Intention-Behavior

Abstract

This research investigates how Islamic philanthropic institutions employ digital persuasive communication strategies on Instagram to bridge the critical intention-behavior gap following public trust deficits. By integrating persuasive message design with an extended Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), this study examines the impact of institutional trust-building, visual social proof (social norms), and instructional clarity (perceived ease of transaction) in predicting digital zakat behavior. An explanatory quantitative survey was conducted among 385 active Instagram followers of Rumah Zakat Indonesia, with data analyzed using the PLS-SEM algorithm. The findings reveal that visual social proof, manifested as a digital bandwagon effect, is the most dominant persuasive predictor of the audience's zakat intention. Crucially, trust-building messages lack a significant direct effect on actual behavior, requiring the audience's intention as a full mediator. Furthermore, clear instructional communication regarding digital transaction functions as a 'moral nudge' that directly facilitates spontaneous giving. To optimize digital philanthropy, persuasive communication campaigns must move beyond generic transparency claims and prioritize influencer-driven social proof combined with frictionless digital call-to-actions.

References

Ahimsa, E. A., Sudarsono, H., Abdul Ghoni, M., & Affandi, M. T. (2023). Understanding muzaki adoption of digital zakat payments in Indonesia. Review of Islamic Social Finance and Entrepreneurship, 182–193. https://doi.org/10.20885/RISFE.vol2.iss2.art7

Aini, N., & Paksi, G. (2024). Determinan Keputusan Generasi Z dalam Melakukan Pembayaran Zakat, Infak, dan Sedekah (ZIS) melalui Platform Digital. Islamic Economics and Finance in Focus, 3(4), 708–727. https://doi.org/10.21776/ieff.2024.03.04.04

Aji, H. M., Albari, A., Muthohar, M., Sumadi, S., Sigit, M., Muslichah, I., & Hidayat, A. (2021). Investigating the determinants of online infaq intention during the COVID-19 pandemic: an insight from Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 12(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-05-2020-0136

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Akbar, F. I., & Burhan, M. U. (2023). Pengaruh Persepsi Kemudahan Penggunaan, Efektivitas, dan Risiko Penggunaan Digital Fundraising terhadap Minat Pembayaran Dana Zakat, Infak, dan Sedekah (ZIS) pada Lembaga Zakat. Islamic Economics and Finance in Focus, 2(3), 465–476. https://doi.org/10.21776/ieff.2023.02.03.08

Annahl, M. A. F., Al Anshory, A. C., & Aulia, M. (2021). Why Do Muslims Pay Zakat Through Institutions? An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 7, 203–226. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v7i0.1313

BAZNAS. (2024). Laporan Pengelolaan Zakat Nasional Akhir Tahun 2024.

Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Abdul-Jabbar, H., & Aziz, S. A. (2021). Does trust in a zakat institution enhance entrepreneurs’ zakat compliance? Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 12(5), 768–790. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2020-0282

Conner, M., & Norman, P. (2022). Understanding the intention-behavior gap: The role of intention strength. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.923464

Djafarova, E., & Rushworth, C. (2017). Exploring the credibility of online celebrities’ Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.009

Fauzia, A. S., Mulatsih, S., & Alexandi, F. (2021). Mapping the potential of zakat collection digitally in Indonesia. International Journal of Zakat, 6(3), 1–22. https://ijazbaznas.com/index.php/journal/article/view/355

Hair, J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Jamaludin, H., Zhang, H., Syed Salleh, S. N., & Lacheheb, Z. (2025). Trust as the engine of change: a conceptual model for trust building in zakat institutions. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-03-2024-0099

Kasri, R. A., & Sosianti, M. W. (2023). Determinants of the Intention to Pay Zakat Online: The Case of Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 9(2), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v9i2.1664

Kim, D.-H., & Kim, B.-Y. (2021). Online Donation Attitude and Satisfaction with Simple Mobile Payments: A Case of the Korean Red Cross. Societies, 12(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12010004

Luthfianto, A., Inshira, A. A., Maulana, S., Septian, C., Putri, K., Dewi, S., Safitri, N., Ridho, D., & Mubarok, S. (2024). LIKA-LIKU DALAM MEMBANGUN KEPERCAYAAN MUZAKKI TERHADAP LEMBAGA AMIL ZAKAT. Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 10(1), 81–97.

Oktavendi, T. W., & Mu’ammal, I. (2022). Acceptance model for predicting adoption of Zakat, Infaq, and Sodaqoh (ZIS) digital payments in Generation Z. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 13(4), 684–700. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2021-0267

Pitria, R. K., Aisy, D. R., & Anggraeni, R. R. T. (2024). Does Reporting of Aksi Cepat Tanggap Cases Affect Public Trust in Institutions? Signifikan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 13(1), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjie.v13i1.41075

Putra, S. M., & Kusumasondjaja, S. (2022). The effectiveness of using Instagram content to promote a charitable crowdfunding campaign. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 25(2), 253–279. https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v25i2.4946

Putri, A. R., & Suwanan, A. F. (2025). Determinants of Generation Z’s Intention to Pay Zakat Digitally. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Teori Dan Terapan, 12(3), 264–283. https://doi.org/10.20473/vol12iss20253pp264-283

Rusanti, E., & Anwar, Moh. M. (2025). Unlocking Zakat compliance: extending the theory of planned behavior with trust in Zakat institutions as a moderator. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-11-2024-0455

Sukmawati, H., Wisandani, I., & Kurniaputri, M. R. (2022). Penerimaan dan Penggunaan Muzakki dalam Membayar Zakat Non-Tunai di Jawa Barat: Ekstensi Teori Technology of Acceptance Model. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Teori Dan Terapan, 9(4), 439–452. https://doi.org/10.20473/vol9iss20224pp439-452

Syaputra, A. D., Ardiansyah, M., & Sa’adah, N. (2025). Exploring zakat payment intentions using the Theory of Planned Behavior among members of Muhammadiyah in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Economics, Lariba, 11(1), 597–616. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol11.iss1.art23

Tyagi, C., & Mukherjee, S. (2024). Compendium of Tools and Scales Measuring Social Norms. https://socialnormscollaborative.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Compendium-of-tools-and-scales-measuring-social-norms-1.pdf

Utami, A. R., H., & Yuliati, L. N. (2021). Behavior of Paying Zakat through Zakat Institutions. International Journal of Research and Review, 8(12), 260–269. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20211232

Zikrinawati, K., Isrounnastiti, F., & Aiyuda, N. (2023). Keputusan Donasi Online Ditinjau dari Pengaruh Trust dan Persepsi Risiko. JIVA: Journal of Behaviour and Mental Health, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.30984/jiva.v4i1.2533

Downloads

Published

2026-06-03

How to Cite

Wijayant, A. S., Suryana, A., & Arifin, H. S. (2026). Persuasive Communication in Digital Philanthropy: Bridging the Zakat Intention-Behavior Gap on Instagram. INJECT (Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication), 11(2), 1833–1852. https://doi.org/10.18326/inject.v11i2.6877

Issue

Section

Articles