Gendered Meanings in AI-Mediated Customer Communication: Female Chatbots in Banking and Telecommunications

Authors

  • Intan Fitranisa Universitas Airlangga
  • Dimas Ramadhiansyah Universitas Airlangga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18326/inject.v11i2.6647

Keywords:

AI-Mediated Communication, Female Chatbots, Gendered Communication, Customer Communication, Gender Stereotypes

Abstract

AI-mediated customer communication has become increasingly prevalent in service industries, particularly through the adoption of chatbots as digital communication agents between organizations and consumers. Beyond their functional role in delivering information and assistance, chatbots often incorporate gendered identities that shape how users interpret and engage with digital interactions. In Indonesia, banking and telecommunications companies widely employ female-coded chatbots as part of their customer communication strategies. This study explores consumers’ perceptions of female chatbots and examines how gendered meanings are negotiated within AI-mediated customer communication. Using a qualitative exploratory approach, in-depth interviews were conducted with consumers who had experience interacting with female chatbots in the banking and telecommunications sectors. The findings reveal that participants generally perceive female chatbots as extensions of frontline customer service communication in digital environments. While participants demonstrated varying interpretations of female chatbot representations, they frequently associated these chatbots with characteristics such as friendliness, patience, and helpfulness. The findings also suggest that the predominance of female-coded chatbots may contribute to the normalization and potential reinforcement of gender stereotypes linking women to service-oriented and emotional labor roles. This study contributes to communication scholarship by highlighting how gendered meanings are embedded, interpreted, and negotiated within AI-mediated customer communication.

References

Adamopoulou, E., & Moussiades, L. (2020). An Overview of Chatbot Technology. In I. Maglogiannis, L. Iliadis, & E. Pimenidis (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations (Vol. 584, pp. 373–383). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49186-4_31

Adoui, A. (2024). AI-driven empowerment of international higher education and international networking: A case study of Moroccan universities. Simulacra, 7(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.21107/sml.v7i1.21911

Arriagada-Bruneau, G., & Larrondo, N. (2025). Gender in the machine: Examining gender dynamics in sex robots, chatbots, and AI assistants. In D. Harp, I. Bachmann, & J. Loke (Eds.), Handbook on Gender and Digital Media (pp. 311–323). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035313570.00035

Ashcroft, A., & Ashcroft, A. (2023). The Gendered Nature of Chatbots: Anthropomorphism and Authenticity. In M. A. Kuhail, B. Abu Shawar, & R. Hammad (Eds.), Advances in Web Technologies and Engineering (pp. 36–78). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6234-8.ch003

Bastiansen, M. H. A., Kroon, A. C., & Araujo, T. (2022). Female chatbots are helpful, male chatbots are competent?: The effects of gender and gendered language on human-machine communication. Publizistik, 67(4), 601–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-022-00762-8

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Camilleri, M. A. (2024). Artificial intelligence governance: Ethical considerations and implications for social responsibility. Expert Systems, 41(7), e13406. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.13406

Costa, P. (2018). Conversing with personal digital assistants: On gender and artificial intelligence. Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts, 59-72 Páginas. https://doi.org/10.7559/CITARJ.V10I3.563

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (third edition). SAGE.

Dave, N., & Kushwah, S. (2025). The Feminization of Generative AI: Gender Delegation Through Names and Personas. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.175000893.36094030/v1

De Cicco, R., Silva, S. C., & Alparone, F. R. (2020). Millennials’ attitude toward chatbots: An experimental study in a social relationship perspective. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 48(11), 1213–1233. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-12-2019-0406

Duan, W., Li, L., Freeman, G., & McNeese, N. (2025). A Scoping Review of Gender Stereotypes in Artificial Intelligence. Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713093

Duan, W., McNeese, N., & Li, L. (2025). Gender Stereotypes toward Non-gendered Generative AI: The Role of Gendered Expertise and Gendered Linguistic Cues. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 9(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3701197

Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 275–298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719

Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864

Feine, J., Gnewuch, U., Morana, S., & Maedche, A. (2020). Gender Bias in Chatbot Design. In A. Følstad, T. Araujo, S. Papadopoulos, E. L.-C. Law, O.-C. Granmo, E. Luger, & P. B. Brandtzaeg (Eds.), Chatbot Research and Design (Vol. 11970, pp. 79–93). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39540-7_6

Følstad, A., Skjuve, M., & Brandtzaeg, P. B. (2019). Different Chatbots for Different Purposes: Towards a Typology of Chatbots to Understand Interaction Design. In S. S. Bodrunova, O. Koltsova, A. Følstad, H. Halpin, P. Kolozaridi, L. Yuldashev, A. Smoliarova, & H. Niedermayer (Eds.), Internet Science (Vol. 11551, pp. 145–156). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17705-8_13

Forgas-Coll, S., Huertas-Garcia, R., Andriella, A., & Alenyà, G. (2023). Gendered Human–Robot Interactions in Services. International Journal of Social Robotics, 15(11), 1791–1807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01035-8

Go, E., & Sundar, S. S. (2019). Humanizing chatbots: The effects of visual, identity and conversational cues on humanness perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.020

Gustavsson, E. (2005). Virtual Servants: Stereotyping Female Front‐Office Employees on the Internet. Gender, Work & Organization, 12(5), 400–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2005.00281.x

Hagerty, A., & Rubinov, I. (2019). Global AI Ethics: A Review of the Social Impacts and Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence (Version 1). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1907.07892

Halberstam, J. (1991). Automating Gender: Postmodern Feminism in the Age of the Intelligent Machine. Feminist Studies, 17(3), 439. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178281

Huang, M.-H., Rust, R., & Maksimovic, V. (2019). The Feeling Economy: Managing in the Next Generation of Artificial Intelligence (AI). California Management Review, 61(4), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619863436

Mohammad Alzub, A. (2023). Navigating the Disruption of Digital and Conventional Media in Changing Media Consumption Landscape in Digital Era. Journal of Engineering, Technology, and Applied Science (JETAS), 5(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.36079/lamintang.jetas-0501.517

Mukhongo, L. L. (2023). Reconstructing gendered narratives through digital platforms and inclusive chatbots. Journal of African Media Studies, 15(3), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1386/jams_00112_1

Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00153

Phillips, B. J., Sedgewick, J. R., & Slobodzian, A. D. (2019). Spokes-Characters in Print Advertising: An Update and Extension. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 40(2), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2018.1503110

Roesler, E., Naendrup-Poell, L., Manzey, D., & Onnasch, L. (2022). Why Context Matters: The Influence of Application Domain on Preferred Degree of Anthropomorphism and Gender Attribution in Human–Robot Interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(5), 1155–1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00860-z

Sheehan, B., Jin, H. S., & Gottlieb, U. (2020). Customer service chatbots: Anthropomorphism and adoption. Journal of Business Research, 115, 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.030

UNESCO & EQUALS Skills Coalition. (2019). I’d blush if I could: Closing gender divides in digital skills through education. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/RAPC9356

Wajcman, J. (2010). Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ben057

Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J., & Epley, N. (2010). Who Sees Human?: The Stability and Importance of Individual Differences in Anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610369336

Downloads

Published

2026-06-18

How to Cite

Fitranisa, I., & Ramadhiansyah, D. (2026). Gendered Meanings in AI-Mediated Customer Communication: Female Chatbots in Banking and Telecommunications . INJECT (Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication), 11(2), 2053–2078. https://doi.org/10.18326/inject.v11i2.6647

Issue

Section

Articles