Contestation Of Public Discourse On The New Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) In The Digital Public Sphere
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18326/inject.v11i1.6238Keywords:
Digital Public Sphere, Discursive Contestation, Legal Legitimacynew KUHAP, Sentiment AnalysisAbstract
The enactment of Indonesia’s new Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) has generated widespread controversy in the digital public sphere, as reflected in polarized public sentiment and discursive contestation between the state and civil society. This study aims to examine how public sentiment is formed, circulated, and contested within the digital discourse surrounding the new KUHAP and its implications for the construction of legal legitimacy. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach, this study integrates social media–based sentiment analysis with critical discourse analysis. The data were derived from visualized public sentiment analytics produced by the DroneEmprit social media analytics platform. The findings reveal a predominance of negative and critical sentiments in the digital public sphere, centered on concerns regarding the potential erosion of human rights protections, expansion of law enforcement authority, and limited public participation in the legislative process. In contrast, state narratives emphasize legal certainty, law enforcement efficiency, and stability of the criminal justice system. The interaction between these competing narratives constitutes an arena of discursive contestation that exposes the polarization of legal legitimacy between state-centered procedural legitimacy and participatory legitimacy advocated by civil society. This study concludes that the digital public sphere functions as a strategic arena for negotiating legal legitimacy, in which the controversy over the new KUHAP reflects structural tensions between state authority and democratic demand.
References
Affourtit, L. J. (2023). Street Art as a Discursive Site for Negotiating Pluricultural Governance : A case study on the Oaxaca commune Case Study on the Oaxaca Commune. Journal of Public Interest Communications, 7(2), 26–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32473/jpic.v7.i2.p26
Angelopoulou, A., Mykoniatis, K., & Smith, A. E. (2024). Analysis of Public Sentiment on COVID-19 Mitigation Measures in Social Media in the United States Using Machine Learning. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 11(1), 307–318. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/tcss.2022.3214527
Anggono, B. D., & Firdaus, F. R. (2020). Public Participation Urgency As Efforts And Requirements For The Formation Of Good Law. 2nd International Conference on Law, Governance and Social Justice (ICOLGAS 2020), 499, 565–573.
Asmarudin, I., Fauzan, M., Nasihuddin, A. A., Riris Ardhanariswari, H., & Nunna, B. P. (2024). Initiating the Reform of Principle Norms in the Formation of Laws in Indonesia. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 12(2), 208–226.
Balaban, D., & Mustățea, M. (2019). Users’ Perspective on the Credibility of Social Media Influencers in Romania and Germany. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 21(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21018/rjcpr.2019.1.269
Bedner, A. (2013). Indonesian Legal Scholarship and Jurisprudence as an Obstacle for Transplanting Legal Institutions. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 5(02), 253–273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1876404512001145
Bertrand, I., & Hughes, P. (2018). Media Research Methods. Media Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55216-7
Chen, D. (2019). Political Context and Citizen Information : Propaganda Effects in China. International Journal OfPublic Opinion Research Vol., 31(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edy019/5079388
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications. http://www.biblioteca.pucminas.br/teses/Educacao_PereiraAS_1.pdf%0Ahttp://www.anpocs.org.br/portal/publicacoes/rbcs_00_11/rbcs11_01.htm%0Ahttp://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/bitstream/11058/7845/1/td_2306.pdf%0Ahttps://direitoufma2010.files.wordpress.com/2010/
Daniel, D., & Habsari, P. (2019). Informational Asymmetry in Public Participation on Environmental Monitoring in Indonesian Regulation : A Preliminary Discourse. CSID Journal of Infrastructure Development, 2(1), 4–19.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2019). The Landscape of Qualitative Research : Theories and Issues. In Sage Publications, Inc.
Drisko, J. W., & Maschi, T. (2015). Interpretive Content Analysis. In Content Analysis (pp. 57–80). online edn, Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190215491.003.0003
Duke, G. (2024). Habermas , Popular Sovereignty , and the Legitimacy of Law. Law and Critique, 35(2), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-023-09358-1
Erfain. (2025). Aktivisme Sosial : Bentuk Partisipasi Masyarakat Sipil dalam Perubahan Sosial. Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences, And Education (JHUSE), 1(7), 11–19.
Esau, K., Choucair, T., Vilkins, S., Svegaard, S. F. K., Bruns, A., Connor-farfan, K. S. O., Lubicz-zaorski, C., Esau, K., Choucair, T., Vilkins, S., & Svegaard, S. F. K. (2025). Destructive polarization in digital communication contexts : a critical review and conceptual framework. Information, Communication & Society, 28(8), 1499–1520. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2413127
García, L. B., & Oleart, A. (2024). Regulating Disinformation and Big Tech in the EU : A Research Agenda on the Institutional Strategies , Public Spheres and Analytical Challenges. Journal of Common Market Studies, 62(5), 1395–1407. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13548
Ghofur, A. (2016). Critical discourse analisys sebuah model analisis sosial kritis dalam teks media. OKARA: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 10(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/177. https://doi.org/10.19105/ojbs.v10i2.978
Hasibuan, S. N., Sihombing, E. N., & Afnila. (2025). Meaningful Participation In The Process Of Formation Local Regulation. SIBATIK JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan, 4(7), 1677–1692.
Ismail, W. S. (2024). Emotion Detection in Text: Advances in Sentiment Analysis Using Deep Learning. Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Applications, 15(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58346/jowua.2024.i1.002
Jannah, R., Lubis, R. H., & Kamdani. (2025). Hak dan Kewajiban Warga Negara. Journal of Literature Review, 1(1), 180–186. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.63822/j5eb3e21
Johnston, M. P. (2014). Secondary Data Analysis: A Method of which the Time Has Come. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries (QQML), 3(3), 619–626. https://doi.org/10.1159/000479695
Jongeling, R., Sarkar, P., Datta, S., & Serebrenik, A. (2017). On negative results when using sentiment analysis tools for software engineering research. Empir Software Eng, 22, 2543–2584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9493-x
Lafont, C. (2015). Deliberation, participation, and democratic legitimacy: Should deliberative mini‐publics shape public policy? Journal of Political Philosophy, 23(1), 40–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12031
Le, Q. L., Tang, J., & Natt, N. (2023). The Social Contract Model in the Digital Era: Revisiting Rousseau and Locke. Interdisciplinary Studies in Society, Law, and Politics, 2(3), 15–26.
Lorenz-spreen, P., Oswald, L., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2023). A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(January), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01460-1
Malik, D. A., Gusela, M. D., Azfa, S. H., & Fauziansah, S. (2024). Enigma in Law Navigating the Labyrinth : A Normative Juridical Analysis of Legal Politics and Policy Formulation in Indonesia. Enigma in Law, 2(1), 75–86.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Morales, J. S. (2020). Perceived popularity and online political dissent: Evidence from Twitter in Venezuela. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219872942
Muliyati, & Maharudin, D. (2025). Social Media Provocation and Public Opinion Shifts in Government Policy Evaluation: A PRISMA Systematic Review. Research Horizon, 05(06), 2445–2458.
Murtadlo, M. A., & Saputra, W. (2025). Law under Algorithmic Pressure : A Critical Review of Viral Cases and Digital Public Opinion. El-SIRRY: Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Sosial, 3(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.24952/ejhis.v3i2.17361
Nangi, M. G., Kamaruddin, S. A., Adam, A., & Lestari, S. A. (2024). Social Media as a Virtual Public Sphere in Health Education : A Systematic Review from the Perspective of Habermas ’ Public Sphere Theory. Jurnal Kesehatan Komunitas Indonesia ( JKKI ), 4(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.58545/jkki.v4i1.225
Nurdin, A., & Sugianto. (2025). Political Law : Dynamics Formation Of Legal Policy In Indonesia. Journal Critical Legal Review, 1(1), 150–167.
Pollack, M. A., & Shaffer, G. C. (2012). The Interaction of Formal and Informal Lawmaking. The Interaction of Formal and Informal Lawmaking., 12(10), 1–30.
Quick, M., & Maddox, J. (2024). Us, Them, Right, Wrong: How TikTok’s Green Screen, Duet, and Stitch help shape political discourse. First Monday, 29(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v29i3.13360
Rahayuningsih, N. O. D., Aziz, S., & Akbar, M. (2025). Digital Activism and Social Change : A Systematic Literature Review of Social Media Movements. Jurnal Spektrum Komunikasi (JSK), 13(3), 367–391.
Reuter, O. J., & Szakonyi, D. (2015). Online social media and political awareness in authoritarian regimes. British Journal of Political Science, 45(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123413000203
Ruiz, C., Domingo, D., Micó, J. L., Díaz-Noci, J., Meso, K., & Masip, P. (2011). Public sphere 2.0? The democratic qualities of citizen debates in online newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(4), 463–487. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211415849
Sabra, I., & Elkadi, M. (2022). Public Sphere Distortion in the Age of Internet Giants: Regulatory Pathways toward the Implications of Automated Online Content Filtering. Journal of Law and Emerging Technologies, 2(1), 51–85.
setneg. (2026). KUHP dan KUHAP Baru Resmi Berlaku, Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia Masuki Era Baru. Humas Kemensetneg RI. https://www.setneg.go.id/baca/index/kuhp_dan_kuhap_baru_resmi_berlaku_penegakan_hukum_di_indonesia_masuki_era_baru
Setyadi, H. B., & Masyhar, A. (2025). Legal Politics in the Draft Criminal Procedure Code ( KUHAP )in Indonesia. Journal of Literature Review, 1(1), 257–262.
Shayaa, S., Jaafar, N. I., Bahri, S., Sulaiman, A., Wai, P. S., Chung, Y. W., Piprani, A. Z., & Al-Garadi, A. M. A. (2018). Sentiment Analysis of Big Data : Methods , Applications , and Open Challenges. IEEE Access, 6(June), 37807–37827. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2851311
Sholikhah, & Cholik, A. (2024). Elaboration of The Meaning of Public Participation in The Formation of Laws and Regulations Post The Decree of The Constitutional Court Number 91 / PUU / XVIII / 2020. Proceeding 2nd International Conference on Law, Economy, Social and Sharia 2024, 2, 423–437.
Standlee, A. (2024). Social Media Analysis. Wiley Online Library, November. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeos1933Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Till, C. (2020). Propaganda through ‘ reflexive control ’ and the mediated construction of reality. New Media & Society, 32(6), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820902446
Tukina, W, S., & Sanjaya, M. (2025). Using Social And Digital Media Responsibly And Healthy: Issues And Challenges. The 7th International Conference on Community Development (ICCD) 2025 “Leveraging Digital Technologies and Innovative Product for Sustainable Community,” 1052–1057.
Wardana, D. J., & Bachtiar, H. (2022). Public Participation in the Law-Making in the Digitalization Era. Indonesia Law Reform Journal, 2(3), 289–298.
Wenando, F. A. (2023). Analisis Opini Publik Terhadap Undang-Undang KUHP Tahun 2022 Menggunakan Algoritma Naïve Bayes Classifier. Jurnal Fasilkom, 13(2), 334–339.
Widjaja, G. (2025). The Dynamics Of Drafting And Revising Legislation In Indonesia: Responding To Social, Economic, And Technological Changes Through A Participatory And Constitutional Approach – A Literature Review. International Journal of Social and Education (INJOSEDU), 2(8), 2517–2528.
Zeeuw, D. de. (2024). Post-truth conspiracism and the pseudo-public sphere. Front. Commun, 9(May), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1384363
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 INJECT (Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
