Moral Framing and Legitimizing Asymmetry in Joe Biden’s Post–October 7, 2023 Israel–Palestine Rhetoric
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18326/inject.v10i1.5824Keywords:
Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), Israel-Palestine Conflict, Global Perceptions, Joe Biden Speech, Political RhetoricAbstract
The Israel-Palestine conflict had long been a focal point of global attention, drawing interest from various perspectives. Within this landscape, the speech delivered by President Joe Biden stood as a significant subject for critical examination. Employing the framework of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), a study dissected President Biden's speech to unravel its rhetorical elements, linguistic nuances, and the implicit impact on the Israel-Palestine conflict. The analysis discerned President Biden's articulated stance, showcasing a nuanced support for Israel while advocating a pursuit of equitable solutions for both sides involved. This investigation underscored the pivotal role of political rhetoric wielded by world leaders in navigating intricate conflicts. This research aimed to shed light on how President Biden's discourse shaped global perceptions of the Israel-Palestine conflict. Anchored in scholarly discourse and employing rigorous analysis, this study elucidated the significance of leader-speak in influencing global perspectives, especially within the context of this complex geopolitical impasse.
References
Akbar, N. F. H., & Abbas, N. F. (2019). Negative Other-Representation in American Political Speeches. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(2), 113. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n2p113
Alashqar, M. (2024). The Role of Language in Framing the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict on Twitter: The Escalation of Violence in Gaza in May 2021 as a Case Study. Faculty of Arts and Philosophy, May 2021, 2023–2024. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.14861.14560
Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z
Chandra, T. M., & Yuliani, F. (2024). Critical Discourse Analysis of Socio-Cultural Content and Post-Pandemic Themes in English Textbooks for Junior High School. Premise: Journal of English Education, 13(2), 579. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v13i2.9165
Christina Purwanti, I Nengah Suandi, I Nyoman Sudiana, & I Putu Mas Dewantara. (2025). Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) Using Teun A. van Dijk’s Model on the “Kabur Aja Dulu” Hashtag in the Kompas.com News Channel. International Journal of Multilingual Education and Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.61132/ijmeal.v2i2.337
Druckman, D., Vuković, S., & Verbeek, N. (2024). Rebel group legitimacy, ideology, and durable peace. International Journal of Conflict Management, 35(1), 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-01-2023-0015
El Damanhoury, K., Saleh, F., & Lebovic, M. (2025). Covering the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Al Jazeera English and BBC’s Online Reporting on the 2023 Gaza War. Journalism and Media, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010009
Élections, G. E. T. (2024). V Political Process : Public Opinion, Attitudes, Parties, Forces, Groups And Elections / Vie Politique : Opinion Publique, Attitudes, Partis, Forces, Groupes Et Élections. International Political Science Abstracts, 74(1), 66–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208345241232781
Fareh, S., Malkawi, R. J., Rabab’ah, G., & Alghazo, S. (2025). Framing Crisis Discourse in Biden’s Political Speech: The Use of Persuasion to Rally Public Support. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 38(7), 2293–2317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-025-10292-x
Ghazal, A., Shaheen, U., & Anwar, A. (2025). Unravelling Global Perceptions of the 2023 Israel- Hamas Conflict: A Discourse-Historical Analysis of Tweets. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Tesol, 8(2).
Hobbs, M., Li, M., Huang, Z. A., & Desmoulins, L. (2025). Storytelling and grand strategy in public diplomacy: A case study of the speeches of president Xi Jinping. Public Relations Review, 51(4), 102594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102594
Mukhortov, D. S., & Zhovner, E. A. (2019). Us-Versus-Them Polarization in the Us Presidential Debates of 2000. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 10(2), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2019-10-2-499-512
Naaz, D. S. S. (2024). The Palestine-Israel Conflict: A Legacy of Power, Identity, and Unyielding Struggle. International Journal of Emerging Knowledge Studies, 03(09), 600–604. https://doi.org/10.70333/ijeks-03-09-018
Oktavina, W., Hadiprashada, D., & Budiman, D. A. (2024). Israeli-Palestinian Conflict After Hamas Attacks October 7, 2023 (Framing Voa Indonesia and Deutsche Welle Indonesia). Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, 5(3), 939–948. https://doi.org/10.59141/jist.v5i3.944
Parta, D., Dewangga, W., Budianto, S., & Wijaya, K. (2025). Fairclough’s Three Dimensions Critical Discourse Analysis of Malcolm X’s Speech at Oxford Union Debate. Maret, 3(3), 70–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59435/gjmi.v3i3.1475 Website
Putra, A. (2024). Narrative discourse of the Israel-Palestine issue in the framework of political communication: A comparative study of Kompas.id and BBC media. Islamic Communication Journal, 9(2), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.21580/icj.2024.9.2.25845
Rouabhia, R. (2024). Discourse and Power in Presidential Rhetoric: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Biden’s State of the Union Address. SSRN Electronic Journal, September. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4957521
Shar, A., Ahmed, N., & Ahmed, B. (2024). A DECADE OF POLICY CHANGE FOR THE USA IN THE MIDDLE EAST (2011-2022). Biannual Research Journal Grassroots, 58(1), 121–147. https://share.google/4uLPpNHn5z98tW9jr
Sokolshchik, L. M. (2024). Year One of the Biden Administration: U.S. Foreign Policy Towards Russia. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 15(1), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/18793665231170639
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 INJECT (Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
