Mapping the Transformation of Political Participation through Digital Citizenship: Global Trends from a Bibliometric Analysis (2019–2024)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18326/inject.v10i2.5063Keywords:
Digital Citizenship, Political Participation, Digital Literacy, Digital Transformation, Online ActivismAbstract
This study investigates the transformation of political participation in the era of digital citizenship, where information and communication technologies have reshaped how citizens engage in democratic processes. Moving beyond traditional notions of rights and obligations, citizenship is increasingly characterized by the ability to participate actively in public affairs through digital platforms. Using a bibliometric analysis of 339 Scopus-indexed articles published between 2019 and 2024, this research maps publication trends, conceptual clusters, and thematic evolutions related to digital citizenship and political participation. The findings reveal four dominant clusters: digital citizenship, citizenship, political participation, and digital transformation that organize the field, with emerging themes such as COVID-19, gender, and digital education policies shaping more recent scholarship. Results highlight the strategic role of digital technologies in enabling political campaigns, online petitions, e-voting, and social media activism while exposing persistent challenges such as misinformation, privacy concerns, and digital divides. This study contributes to the literature by offering a comprehensive mapping of global scholarship, clarifying conceptual linkages, and identifying research gaps related to inclusivity and cross-regional comparisons. Strengthening digital and media literacy is crucial to ensure more inclusive, ethical, and meaningful forms of political participation in the digital age.
References
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Boulianne, S. (2020). Twenty Years of Digital Media Effects on Civic and Political Participation. Communication Research, 47(7), 947–966. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218808186
Boulianne, S., & Theocharis, Y. (2020). Young people, digital media, and engagement: A meta-analysis of research. Social Science Computer Review, 38(2), 111–127.
Chen, C. H., Liu, C. L., Hui, B. P. H., & Chung, M. L. (2020). Does education background affect digital equal opportunity and the political participation of sustainable digital citizens? A Taiwan case. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041359
Choi, M. (2016a). A Concept Analysis of Digital Citizenship for Democratic Citizenship Education in the Internet Age. Theory and Research in Social Education, 44(4), 565–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1210549
Choi, M. (2016b). A Concept Analysis of Digital Citizenship for Democratic Citizenship Education in the Internet Age. Theory and Research in Social Education, 44(4), 565–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1210549
Dijck, J. van. (2018). The platform society : public values in a connective world / José van Dijck, Thomas Poell, Martijn de Waal. In Platform Society. Oxford university press.
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Loader, B. D., Vromen, A., & Xenos, M. A. (2014). The networked young citizen: Social media, political participation and civic engagement. In The Networked Young Citizen: Social Media, Political Participation and Civic Engagement (pp. 1–212). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315778594
Mascheroni, G., & Ólafsson, K. (2016). The mobile Internet: Access, use, opportunities and divides among European children. New Media and Society, 18(8), 1657–1679. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814567986
Mihailidis, P., & Thevenin, B. (2013). Media Literacy as a Core Competency for Engaged Citizenship in Participatory Democracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(11), 1611–1622. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213489015
Pirouz, B., Arcuri, N., Pirouz, B., Palermo, S. A., Turco, M., & Maiolo, M. (2020). Development of an assessment method for evaluation of sustainable factories. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(5), 1841. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051841
Schmidthuber, L., Hilgers, D., & Rapp, M. (2019). Political innovation, digitalisation and public participation in party politics. Policy and Politics, 47(3), 391–413. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420054
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 INJECT (Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
