Framing Dedi Mulyadi's Vasectomy Policy in International Media: A Comparative Analysis Using Entman's Framing Theory and Its Implications for Indonesia's Public Diplomacy

Authors

  • Tris Dina Susanti Universitas Majalengka
  • Atef Fahrudin Universitas Padjadjaran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18326/inject.v10i2.5045

Keywords:

Dedi Mulyadi, Framing Analysis, International Media, Political Communication, Public Policy

Abstract

This study examines the international media's portrayal of the vasectomy policy as a prerequisite for accessing social assistance, as proposed by West Java Governor Dedi Mulyadi. Using Robert Entman's theoretical framework, this research examines how three international media outlets (Channel News Asia, South China Morning Post, and The Telegraph) frame this controversial policy through four key elements: problem definition, causal interpretation, moral evaluation, and treatment recommendation. The research method employs qualitative framing analysis with a systematic approach to the news corpus from the three media outlets. Results indicate that all three media outlets use negative framing with a dominance of moral evaluation (90%) and problem definition (85%), yet with different strategies: SCMP uses a "discriminatory policy" frame (9/10), Telegraph emphasizes "human rights violation" (8/10), and CNA employs a "governance problem" approach (7/10). Differences in intensity and editorial tone reflect the geographical and ideological orientations of each media outlet, with the SCMP being the most critical, the Telegraph focusing on international human rights standards, and CNA adopting a more contextual approach to the complexities of Southeast Asia. This study confirms the relevance of Entman's theory in the digital era and reveals that treatment recommendation is the most diverse element in international framing. These findings offer strategic implications for Indonesia's public diplomacy, suggesting the development of targeted and proactive communication strategies in response to the evolving global media landscape.

References

Archetti, C. (2012). The Impact of New Media on Diplomatic Practice: An Evolutionary Model of Change. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 7(2), 181–206. https://doi.org/10.1163/187119112X625538

Bhatti, S. J., Billinson, P. P., Cornell, L. A., Das, A., Gammon, C., Kelly, L. O., Yang, J., & Kristiansen, S. (2022). A country comparative analysis of international print media’s framing of the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Communication, 16, 1756–1779.

Castells, M. O. (2015). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age (2nd ed.). Polity Press.

Chakravartty, P., & Zhao, Y. (2008). Global Communications: Toward a Transcultural Political Economy. Rowman & Littlefield.

Chen, X., Hale, S. A., Jurgens, D., Samory, M., Zuckerman, E., & Grabowicz, P. A. (2024). Global News Synchrony and Diversity During the Start of the COVID-19 Pandemic (2405.00280). arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.00280

Civila de Dios, S., & Romero-Rodríguez, L. M. (2018). Comparative analysis of media framing in international agencies of east-west news: Case study attack at Istanbul airport. Universitas, 29, 127–147. https://doi.org/10.17163/uni.n29.2018.06

D’Angelo, P., & Kuypers, J. A. (Eds.). (2010). Doing News Framing Analysis: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203864463

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Entman, R. M. (2008). Theorizing Mediated Public Diplomacy: The U.S. Case. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208314657

Entman, R. M., & Usher, N. (2018). Framing in a fractured democracy: Impacts of digital technology on ideology, power and cascading network activation. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx019

Foley, K., Ward, P., & McNaughton, D. (2019). Innovating qualitative framing analysis for purposes of media analysis within public health inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 29(7), 1050–1063. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319826559

Gilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a Theory of Public Diplomacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207312142

Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, Media, Language (pp. 128–138). Routledge.

Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790867

Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. Pantheon Books.

Howard, P. N., & Hussain, M. M. (2013). Democracy’s Fourth Wave?: Digital Media and the Arab Spring. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199936953.001.0001

Lecheler, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2018). News Framing Effects (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315208077

Lim, J., & Seo, H. (2009). Frame flow between government and the news media and its effects on the public: Framing of North Korea. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 21(2), 204–223. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edp011

López-Rabadán, P. (2022). Framing studies evolution in the social media era: Digital advancement and reorientation of the research agenda. Social Sciences, 11(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11010009

Matthes, J. (2009). What’s in a frame? A content analysis of media framing studies in the world’s leading communication journals, 1990-2005. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(2), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900908600206

Newey, S. (2025). Have a vasectomy if you want benefits, says Indonesian governor. The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2025/05/09/have-vasectomy-if-want-benefits-indonesian-governor/

Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means To Success In World Politics. PublicAffairs. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:150407368

Reese, S. D. (2007). The Framing Project: A Bridging Model for Media Research Revisited. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00334.x

Rowbotham, S., Conte, K., Hawe, P., Janda, M., Mills, S., Paul, C., & Tzelepis, F. (2019). Research on media framing of public policies to prevent chronic disease: A narrative synthesis. Social Science & Medicine, 237, 112428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112428

Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x

Seib, P. (2012). Real-Time Diplomacy: Politics and Power in the Social Media Era. Palgrave Macmillan.

Seurings, J., Vliegenthart, R., & de Vreese, C. H. (2024). Framing policy reform in Europe: A comparative study of frame variation across countries, newspapers, and time. Journalism Studies, 25(8), 1089–1108. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2024.2358117

Siregar, K. (2025). Innovative or dangerous? Indonesia’s local leaders raise eyebrows with vasectomy for aid and other schemes. Channel News Asia. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/asia/indonesia-politics-regional-leaders-policies-vasectomy-delinquents-boot-camp-transport-cat-island-5119576

van der Meer, T. G. L. A., Verhoeven, P., W.J. Beentjes, H., & Vliegenthart, R. (2017). Communication in times of crisis: The stakeholder relationship under pressure. Public Relations Review, 43(2), 426–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.005

Vliegenthart, R., & van Zoonen, L. (2011). Power to the frame: Bringing sociology back to frame analysis. European Journal of Communication, 26(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323111404838

Wang, Y. (2008). Public Diplomacy and the Rise of Chinese Soft Power. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207312757

Yuniar, R. W. (2025). Indonesian governor’s “ridiculous” vasectomy plan sparks debate on poverty, “body politics.” South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3309449/indonesian-governors-ridiculous-vasectomy-plan-sparks-debate-poverty-body-politics

Downloads

Published

2025-10-02

How to Cite

Susanti, T. D., & Fahrudin, A. (2025). Framing Dedi Mulyadi’s Vasectomy Policy in International Media: A Comparative Analysis Using Entman’s Framing Theory and Its Implications for Indonesia’s Public Diplomacy. INJECT (Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication), 10(2), 495–522. https://doi.org/10.18326/inject.v10i2.5045

Issue

Section

Articles