Social Media Activity And Trust In Digital Vs. Traditional News: A Quantitative Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18326/inject.v10i1.4380Keywords:
Social media, Trust, Online news, Traditional media, DigitalAbstract
This study aims to analyze the relationship between social media activity and the level of trust in digital news, both disseminated through social media and traditional media. With a quantitative approach and explanatory design, data were collected through a survey of 300 social media active respondents in Indonesia and analyzed using the Pearson correlation test and simple linear regression. Results showed a positive and significant relationship between social media activity and trust in news on social media (r = 0.478; β = 0.472; R² = 0.229), but there was no significant association with trust in news in traditional media (r = –0.108; β = –0.094; R² = 0.011). These findings suggest that nearly a quarter of the variation in trust in digital news can be explained by the intensity of users' social activity in digital media, with trust mechanisms driven more by algorithmic exposure, social validation, and echo chamber effects than institutional credibility. This study confirms and contextualizes the media trust model and agenda-setting theory in Indonesia's digital environment, especially considering that 91% of respondents stated that they first encountered news through social media. This study recommends strengthening digital literacy based on social interaction and developing news distribution strategies adaptive to people's digital trust patterns.
References
Arikunto, S. (2019). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Diego Garusi, Clara Juarez Miro, Folker Hanusch. (2025). Understanding news media trust through the lens of phenomenological sociology, Communication Theory. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaf005
Edelman. (2023). Edelman Trust Barometer 2023. https://www.edelman.com/trust/2023/trust-barometer.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: Global edition. In the UK: Pearson Education Limited.
Hermida, A., Fletcher, F., Korell, D., & Logan, D. (2012). Share, like, recommend: Decoding the social media news consumer. Journalism Studies, 13(5–6), 815–824.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.664430
Kaplan, AM, & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53 (1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of Mass Communication by the Individual. In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.). The Uses of Mass Communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Kohring, M., & Matthes, J. (2007). Trust in news media: Development and validation of a multidimensional scale. Communication Research, 34, 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650206298071
McCombs, ME, & Shaw, DL (1972). Fungsi agenda setting media massa. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36 (2), 176–187.
McQuail, D. (2010). Mass Communication Theory 6th Edition. In Mass Communication Theory, 6th Edition. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
McQuail, D. (2011). Teori Komunikasi Massa. Dalam Teori Komunikasi Massa. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
McQuail, D. (2011). Teori Komunikasi Massa McQuail Edisi 6. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Neuman, W. Lawrence. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andi, S., Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2023). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2023. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2023
Nielsen, R., & Graves, L. (2017). “News you don’t believe”: Audience perspectives on fake news. Reuters Institute. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/news-you-dont-believe-audience-perspectives-
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York. NY: MMcGraw-Hill
Palinkas, L. A., et al. (2015). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42, 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. Penguin Press.
Park, S., Fisher, C., Lee, J. Y., McGuinness, K., & McCallum, K. (2018). Digital news report: Australia 2018. News and Media Research Centre, University of Canberra.
Sari, DR, & Nugroho, AD (2021). Literasi digital dan kepercayaan terhadap informasi di media sosial. Jurnal Komunikasi , 16(2), 159–172.
Shin, D., & Thorson, K. (2017). Partisan selective sharing: The biased diffusion of fact-checking messages on social media. Journal of Communication, 67(2), 233–255.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12284
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Bisnis: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tandoc Jr., Edson. C., Lim, Zheng Wei, & Ling, Richard. (2017). Defining "Fake News": A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
Lemmens, J. Valkenburg, P., & Peter, J. (2011). Psychosocial causes and consequences of pathological gaming. Computers in Human Behavior, 144-152.
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
We Are Social & Meltwater. (2024). Digital 2024: Indonesia. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-indonesia.
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2, Pt.2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 INJECT (Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
