Legal Issues of Digital Asset Inheritance from an Islamic Law Perspective

Akramov Akmaljon Anvarjon ugli; Abdikhakimov Islombek Bahodir ugli; Sharipova Xilola Rustamovna; ⁠Yakubova Madinabonu Abdumalikovna; Gulommamatova Parvina Akbarali kizi

Authors

Akramov Akmaljon Anvarjon ugli Tashkent State University of Law
Abdikhakimov Islombek Bahodir ugli Tashkent State University of Law https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3682-2810
Sharipova Xilola Rustamovna Tashkent State University of Law https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7437-0897
⁠Yakubova Madinabonu Abdumalikovna Tashkent State University of Law https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7002-5217
Gulommamatova Parvina Akbarali kizi Tashkent State University of Law https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2120-2292

Keywords:

digital inheritance; , estate planning; , platform policies; , privacy rights; , succession law.

Abstract

The rise of virtual assets has presented significant legal challenges for inheritance systems worldwide. This article examines the intricate relationship between traditional inheritance laws and the distinctive characteristics of digital assets, with a focus on the legal challenges associated with digital inheritance from an Islamic law perspective. By employing a comparative approach, the research examines how various legal systems address the succession of digital assets, highlighting the primary conflicts that arise when restrictive terms of service from platforms clash with established inheritance laws. Furthermore, it explores how privacy regulations, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), create barriers to data access for rightful heirs. The findings reveal that existing laws are either lacking or inadequate in addressing digital assets, particularly cryptocurrencies held on exchanges and new platforms. The research proposes a normative framework that aims to strike a balance between legitimate inheritance rights and privacy concerns, considering relevant legislation and court rulings. Ultimately, the study concludes that advancements in technology, enhanced estate planning tools, and legislative reform are necessary to ensure a smooth transfer of digital assets to future generations.

References

A. Akramov, A. et al. (2024) ‘The Impact of Digitalization in Inheritance Law’, Qubahan Academic Journal, 4(3), pp. 100–134. Available at: https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v4n3a863.

Ali, N., Salikin, A.D. and Kosim, K. (2025) ‘The Urgency of Harmonizing Civil Inheritance Law with Digital Assets in the Indonesian Legal System’, JURNAL AKTA, 12(4), p. 1094. Available at: https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v12i4.47286.

Aliyu, S., Abd Wahab, N. and Kamis, N.S. (2025) ‘An analysis of crypto-asset trade, enforcement, and estate planning’, Borsa Istanbul Review, 25(1), pp. 206–226. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2024.12.008.

AllahRakha, N. (2025a) ‘Legislators Qualifications in Pakistan Under Islamic Constitutional Provisions’, Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 5(2), pp. 473–499. Available at: https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v5i2.491.

AllahRakha, N. (2025b) ‘THE LEGALITY OF REVERSE ENGINEERING AND THE PROTECTION OF TRADE SECRETS IN THE SOFTWARE INDUSTRY’, Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah, 15(2), pp. 309–336. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18860/j.v15i2.28422.

Artamkin, K. (2023) ‘Application of Modern Technologies in Notarial Activity in the Inheritance of Digital Financial Assets’, Legal Concept, (4), pp. 45–50. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15688/lc.jvolsu.2023.4.6.

Bekiroğlu, A.M., El Amri, M.C. and Mohammed, M.O. (2025) ‘Empirical validation of a framework for Fiqh analysis of crypto assets’, Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, pp. 1–26. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-03-2025-0075.

Buitelaar, J.C. (2017) ‘Post-mortem privacy and informational self-determination’, Ethics and Information Technology, 19(2), pp. 129–142. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-017-9421-9.

Chowdhury, J. (2025) ‘Digital Legacy: Redefining Estate Law in the Age of Social Media and Virtual Assets’, Legal Research & Analysis, 3(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.69971/lra.3.1.2025.57.

Chulkov, V.O. and Kazaryan, R.R. (2020) ‘The Concept of Advance Formation of Anthropotechnical Security of Functioning and Life Quality of a Human in Cyberphysical Building Systems Using Digitalization’, in Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific and Practical Conference “Modern Management Trends and the Digital Economy: from Regional Development to Global Economic Growth” (MTDE 2020). 2nd International Scientific and Practical Conference “Modern Management Trends and the Digital Economy: from Regional Development to Global Economic Growth” (MTDE 2020), Yekaterinburg, Russia: Atlantis Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200502.061.

Cui, J., Gao, L. and Wang, Y. (2024) ‘The Impact of Cryptocurrency Exposure on Corporate Tax Avoidance Among US Listed Companies’, Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(11), p. 488. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17110488.

Dominicé, A.M. and Haux, D.H. (2020) ‘The Decision of the German Federal Court of Justice against Facebook: Opportunity to Define Digital Heritage?’, Santander Art and Culture Law Review, (2 (6)), pp. 251–260. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.20.018.13021.

Durovic, M. and Willett, C. (2023) ‘A Legal Framework for Using Smart Contracts in Consumer Contracts: Machines as Servants, Not Masters’, The Modern Law Review, 86(6), pp. 1390–1421. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12817.

Edwards, L. (2004) ‘Reconstructing consumer privacy protection on‐line: a modest proposal’, International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 18(3), pp. 313–344. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360086042000276762.

Fedosenko, N.A. (2025) ‘Digital assets as an object of civil rights: an attempt to qualify in the absence of a special legal regime’, Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, 1(3), pp. 335–339. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2025.03.1.50.

Gordon, J.S. (2023) ‘Comparative judicial federalism’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 21(4), pp. 976–1010. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moad081.

Gulyamov, S.S., Egamberdiev, E. and Naeem, A. (2024) ‘Practice-Oriented Approach to Reforming the Traditional Model of Higher Education with the Application of EdTech Technologies’, in 2024 4th International Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education (TELE). 2024 4th International Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education (TELE), Lipetsk, Russian Federation: IEEE, pp. 340–343. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/TELE62556.2024.10605684.

Harbinja, E. (2019) ‘Emails and death: Legal issues surrounding post-mortem transmission of emails’, Death Studies, 43(7), pp. 435–445. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2019.1609133.

Harbinja, E., McVey, M. and Edwards, L. (2024) ‘Post - mortem privacy and digital legacy - a qualitative enquiry’, SCRIPTed: A Journal of Law, Technology & Society, 21, pp. 4–39. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2218/scrip.210024.4.

Hayajneh, A.Z. (2016) ‘الميراث الرقمي: المفهوم والتحديات القانونية’, International Review of Law, 2016(1), p. 2. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5339/irl.2016.2.

Hernando-Corrochano, J., Pastor-Vargas, R. and Hernández-Berlinches, R. (2025) ‘Trusted wills for digital assets using blockchain: a practical case’, Blockchain: Research and Applications, 6(3), p. 100289. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcra.2025.100289.

Holt, J. et al. (2024) ‘Post-mortem information management: exploring contextual factors in appropriate personal data access after death’, Human–Computer Interaction, pp. 1–36. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2023.2300792.

Hu, T. (2024) ‘Study on the Inheritance System for Virtual Property on The Internet’, Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 16(3), pp. 111–116. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54097/ckjng615.

Juhász, Á. (2025) ‘Digital Assets and Their Assessment in Private Law with Special Regard on Inheritance Law Provisions’, Revista de Derecho Privado, (49), pp. 113–147. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18601/01234366.49.04.

Katuk, N., Abd Wahab, N. and Kamis, N.S. (2023) ‘Cryptocurrency estate planning: the challenges, suggested solutions and Malaysia’s future directions’, Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 25(4), pp. 325–350. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-10-2021-0126.

Khalfaoui, M. et al. (2024) ‘Legal Transformation in Muslim Societies’. Unpublished. Available at: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20039.41124.

Kneese, T. (2019) ‘Networked heirlooms: the affective and financial logics of digital estate planning’, Cultural Studies, 33(2), pp. 297–324. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2018.1466904.

Kraiwanit, T., Limna, P. and Suradinkura, S. (2025) ‘Digital Asset Adoption in Inheritance Planning: Evidence from Thailand’, Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(6), p. 330. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18060330.

Kramer-Smyth, J. (2018) Partners for Preservation: Advancing Digital Preservation through Cross-Community Collaboration. 1st edn. Facet. Available at: https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783303496.

Liu, X. et al. (2025) ‘Blockchain in digital cultural heritage resources: technological integration, consensus mechanisms, and future directions’, npj Heritage Science, 13(1), p. 235. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-025-01818-4.

Macena Gotardo, I. and Martins Silva Rocha, J. (2025) ‘A EFICÁCIA DA HERANÇA DIGITAL: DESAFIOS E SOLUÇÕES JURÍDICAS’, Revista Multidisciplinar do Nordeste Mineiro, 21(01), pp. 1–14. Available at: https://doi.org/10.61164/p946gn41.

Ma’mun, S. (2011) ‘Ilhaq dalam Bahtsul Masa’il NU: Antara Ijtihad dan Ikhtiyat’, AL-QALAM, 28(1), pp. 63–86. Available at: https://doi.org/10.32678/alqalam.v28i1.512.

Matanovac Vučković, R. and Kanceljak, I. (2019) ‘DOES THE RIGHT TO USE DIGITAL CONTENT AFFECT OUR DIGITAL INHERITANCE?’, in. EU AND MEMBER STATES – LEGAL AND ECONOMIC ISSUES, pp. 724–746. Available at: https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/9029.

Mijatovic, M. (2025) ‘DIGITAL ASSETS AND INHERITANCE LAW: LEGAL VACUUM OR NEW PARADIGM’, SCIENCE International Journal, 4(3), pp. 7–11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0403007m.

Nabeel. K, M. and Sumathy, M. (2023) ‘Cryptocurrency: An Islamic Finance Perspective’, Al-Muhasib: Journal of Islamic Accounting and Finance, 3(1), pp. 55–69. Available at: https://doi.org/10.30762/almuhasib.v3i1.237.

Omoola, S. and Ibrahim, H.K. (2023) ‘The Legal Implications of Abandoned Digital Assets in Sharīʿah-Compliant Fintech Platforms’, ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 15(2), pp. 60–76. Available at: https://doi.org/10.55188/ijif.v15i2.542.

Pedin, A.B., Siasi, N. and Sameni, M. (2023) ‘Smart Contract-Based Social Recovery Wallet Management Scheme for Digital Assets’, in Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Southeast Conference. ACMSE 2023: 2023 ACM Southeast Conference, Virtual Event USA: ACM, pp. 177–181. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3564746.3587016.

Rodrigues, R. (2020) ‘Legal and human rights issues of AI: Gaps, challenges and vulnerabilities’, Journal of Responsible Technology, 4, p. 100005. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2020.100005.

Rosadi, S. (2018) ‘Protecting Privacy On Personal Data In Digital Economic Era : Legal Framework In Indonesia’, Brawijaya Law Journal, 5(2), pp. 143–157. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2018.005.01.09.

Rosele, M.I. et al. (2022) ‘The Concept of Wealth ( māl ) in the Sharīʿah and Its Relation to Digital Assets’, Sage Open, 12(2), p. 21582440221102424. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221102424.

Ryu, E.A. and Han, E. (2021) ‘Social Media Influencer’s Reputation: Developing and Validating a Multidimensional Scale’, Sustainability, 13(2), p. 631. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020631.

Savelyev, A. (2017) ‘Contract law 2.0: “Smart” contracts as the beginning of the end of classic contract law’, Information & Communications Technology Law, 26(2), pp. 116–134. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2017.1301036.

Schwiderowski, J. et al. (2023) ‘Value creation and capture in decentralized finance markets: Non-fungible tokens as a class of digital assets’, Electronic Markets, 33(1), p. 45. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00658-z.

Sharma, A. (2024) ‘Protecting Digital Assets: Government Initiatives and NGOs Participation’, Indian Journal of Public Administration, 70(3), pp. 479–492. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/00195561241257402.

Singh, R.G., Shrivastava, A. and Ruj, S. (2022) ‘A Digital Asset Inheritance Model to Convey Online Persona Posthumously’, International Journal of Information Security, 21(5), pp. 983–1003. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-022-00593-8.

Toygar, A., Rohm, C.E.T. and Zhu, J. (2013) ‘A New Asset Type: Digital Assets’, Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 22(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.58729/1941-6679.1024.

Wendehorst, C. (2023) ‘Proprietary Rights in Digital Assets and the Conflict of Laws’, in A. Bonomi, M. Lehmann, and S. Lalani (eds) Blockchain and Private International Law. Brill | Nijhoff, pp. 101–127. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004514850_007.

Wieringa, J. et al. (2021) ‘Data analytics in a privacy-concerned world’, Journal of Business Research, 122, pp. 915–925. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.005.

Yang, Q. (2025) ‘Principles for the Standardized Handling of Digital Property Inheritance’, Humanities and Social Science Research, 8(3), p. p29. Available at: https://doi.org/10.30560/hssr.v8n3p29.

Yolanda, M.K., Paramitha, C.L. and Putra, M.R.S. (2024) ‘Exploring Digital Assets Inheritance: A Comparative Study of Transnational Legal Frameworks and Practices’, AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia, 4(1), pp. 942–951. Available at: https://doi.org/10.57235/aurelia.v4i1.4483.

Zhuk, A. (2025) ‘Beyond the blockchain hype: addressing legal and regulatory challenges’, SN Social Sciences, 5(2), p. 11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-024-01044-y.