Analysis of Indonesian Islamic banking performance using Sharia Maqasid Index and simple additive weighting rating
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18326/muqtasid.v15i1.66-68Keywords:
Islamic banking performance, Sharia Maqasid Index, tahdzib al-fard, iqamah al-adl, jabl al-maslahahAbstract
This study aims to analyze the performance of Islamic Commercial Banks (ICB) and Islamic Banking Units (IBU) in Indonesia in 2021-2023 based on the Sharia Maqasid Index (SMI) and Simple Additive Weighting Rating (SAWR). Assessment of the performance of ICB and IBU in the Annual Report so far is only based on financial ratios, so it cannot evaluate the basic principles of Islamic banks. Therefore, the SMI and SAWR approaches are used to measure the performance of Islamic banks. The object of this research is 13 ICB and 20 IBU registered with OJK (Financial Services Authority). The results showed that the highest total score was Bank Mega Syariah (BMS) in 2021, Bank Panin Dubai Syariah (BPDS) in 2022 and 2023, IBU BPD Nagari (Sumatra Barat) in 2021 and 2023, and IBU BPD Jawa Timur in 2022. Each ICB and IBU has generally been able to carry out all of its objectives, namely Tahdzib al-fard (educating individuals), Iqamah al-adl (upholding justice), and Jabl al-Maslahah (Creating welfare). This research provides implications for further evaluation and development regarding the appropriate performance assessment of ICB and IBU and the following Sharia principles prioritizing the benefit of the people
References
Al Arif, M. N. R. (2010). Basic marketing of Islamic banks. Alfabeta.
Al-Ghifari, M., Handoko, L. H., & Yani, E. A. (2015). Analisis kinerja perbankan Syariah di Indonesia dan Malaysia dengan pendekatan Maqashid Indeks. Jurnal Ekonomidan Perbankan Syariah, 3(2), 47-66. https://doi.org/10.46899/jeps.v3i2.160.
Amalia, R. (2020). Bagaimanakah kinerja Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia?: Penilaian dengan Sharia Maqashid Index (SMI). Jurnal Ilmu Perbankan dan Keuangan Syariah, 2(1) 46-69. https://doi.org/10.24239/jipsya.v2i1.22.46-69.
Antonio, M. S., Sanrego, Y. D., & Taufiq, M. (2012). An analysis of Islamic banking performance: Maqasid Index implementation in Indonesia and Jordania. Journal of Islamic Finance, 1(1), 12-29. https://doi.org/10.31436/jif.v1i1.2.
Cakhyaneu, A. (2018). Pengukuran kinerja bank umum Syariah di Indonesia berdasarkan Sharia Maqashid Index (SMI). Amwaluna: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah, 2(2), 154-165. https://doi.org/10.29313/amwaluna.v2i2.3753.
Hartono, S., & Sobari, A. (2017). Sharia Maqasid Index as a measuring performance of Islamic banking: A more holistic approach. Corporate Ownership and Control, 14(2), 193- 201. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i2c1p5.
Hassan, M. K. (2006). The X-efficiency in Islamic banks. Islamic Economic Studies, 13(2), 50-78.
Hudaefi, F. A., & Noordin, K. (2019). Harmonizing and constructing an integrated maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah index for measuring the performance of Islamic banks. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 11(2), 282-302. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijif-01-2018-0003.
Ika, S. R., & Abdullah, N. (2011). A comparative study of financial performance of Islamic banks and conventional banks in Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(15), 199-207.
Indriyani, F. (2015). Komparasi Kinerja Perbankan Syariah dengan Bank Konvensional: Suatu Studi Literatur. Muqtasid: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah, 6(2), 109-124. https://doi.org/10.18326/muqtasid.v6i2.109-124.
Koch, T. W., & MacDonald, S. S. (2014). Bank management. Cengage Learning.
Kuppusamy, M. V., Saleh, A. S., & Samudhram, A. (2010). Measurement of Islamic banks performance using a Sharia conformity and profitability model. Review of Islamic Economics, 13(2), 35-48.
Mohammed, M. O., & Razak, D. A., & Taib, F. M. (2008). The performance measures of Islamic banking based on the maqasid framework. Proceeding of IIUM International Accounting Conference IV (INTAC IV), 1-17.
Muhammad, R. & Oktaviyanti, H.Y. (2020). Dampak Tata Kelola Bank Syariah Terhadap Kepatuhan Syariah Berbasis Maqashid Syariah. Wahana: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, dan Akuntansi, 23(2), 239-259. https://doi.org/10.35591/wahana.v23i2.188.
OJK (2024). Statistics on Islamic Banking in Indonesia in 2023, https://ojk.go.id/id/kanal/Sharia/data-dan-statistik/statistik-perbankan-Sharia/Pages/Statistik-PerbankanSharia---Januari-023.aspx
Ramdhoni, M. I., & Fauzi, F. A. (2020). Islamic bank performance: An assessment using Sharia Maqasid Index, Sharia conformity and profitability and CAMELS. International Journal of Applied Business Research, 2(1), 15-30. https://doi: 10.35313/ijabr.v2i01.79.
Ramadhani, R. & Mutia, E. (2016). Comparative analysis of Islamic banking performance in Indonesia and Malaysia as viewed from the maqasid sharia Index. Proceeding of XIX National Accounting Symposium.
Samad, A. (1999). Comparative efficiency of the Islamic banks vis-a-vis conventional banks in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 7(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijema.v7i1.46.
Setiyobono, R., Ahmar, N., & Darmansyah. (2019). Pengukuran Kinerja Perbankan Syariah Berbasis Maqashid Syariah Index Bank Syariah di Indonesia: Abdul Majid Najjar Versus Abu Zahrah. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Perpajakan, 6(2), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.35838/jrap.2019.006.02.21.
Silvia, M., Andriana, I., & Marwa, T. (2019). Performance of Indonesia Islamic bank based on Maqasid Sharia Index: Stakeholder theory perspective. International Journal of Business, Accounting, and Management, 4(1), 1-9.
Sugiyono. (2007). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Alfabeta.
Syofyan, A. (2017). Analisis kinerja bank Syariah dengan metode Indeks Maqasid Syariah di Indonesia. Al Masraf: Jurnal Lembaga Keuangan dan Perbankan, 2(2), 145-158.
http://dx.doi.org/10.15548/al-masraf.v2i2.113.
Yudistira, D. (2004). Efficiency in Islamic banking: An empirical analysis of eighteen banks. Islamic Economic Studies, 12(1), 1-19.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ahmad Dahlan Malik, Muhammad Asyhad, Nurul Jannah, Wulan Nuraini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
