The effect of environmental, social, and governance practices on profitability performance with financial slack as a moderator
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18326/muqtasid.v15i1.1-14Keywords:
profitability, environmental, social, governance, slackAbstract
This study aims to obtain empirical evidence on the effects of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) on the profitability performance of Islamic companies, incorporating the moderating effect of financial slack in this relationship. The sample includes Islamic companies listed on the Jakarta Islamic Index 70 (JII 70) and the SRI KEHATI index over the 2021-2023 period, resulting in 129 firm-year observations. Panel data analysis using Eviews 13 software identified the Random Effect Model as the best approach. Findings indicate that ESG practices significantly affect profitability, supporting agency theory by suggesting that management may engage in ESG activities that incur costs without clear financial benefits for shareholders. Financial slack does not moderate the ESG-profitability relationship. Instead, financial slack, proxied by the cash ratio, directly impacts profitability. These findings suggest that while ESG practices may have profitability trade-offs, financial flexibility could enhance profit potential in Islamic companies. For policymakers, these results underscore the need to tailor ESG frameworks to the unique financial dynamics of Islamic companies, potentially aiding these firms in achieving both sustainable and profitable growth.
References
Allouche, J., & Laroche, P. (2005). A Meta-analytical investigation of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Revue de Gestion Des Ressources Humaines, 57, 18–41.
Awa, H. O., Etim, W., & Ogbonda, E. (2024). Stakeholders, stakeholder theory and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 9, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-024-00094-y.
Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0496-z.
Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2010). Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica, 77(305), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2009.00843.x.
Bhandari, K. R., Ranta, M., & Salo, J. (2022). The resource-based view, stakeholder capitalism, ESG, and sustainable competitive advantage: The firm’s embeddedness into ecology, society, and governance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1525–1537. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2967.
Borghesi, R., Houston, J. F., & Naranjo, A. (2014). Corporate socially responsible investments: CEO altruism, reputation, and shareholder interests. Journal of Corporate Finance, 26, 164–181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.03.008.
Brown, W. O., Helland, E., & Smith, J. K. (2006). Corporate philanthropic practices. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(5), 855–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2006.02.001.
Buniamin, S. (2020). Managers’ perceptions on stakeholder power In relation to ESG reporting. In N. S. Othman, A. H. B. Jaaffar, N. H. B. Harun, S. B. Buniamin, N. E. A. B. Mohamad, I. B. M. Ali, N. H. B. A. Razali, & S. L. B. M. Hashim (Eds.), Driving Sustainability through Business-Technology Synergy, vol 100. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 139-149). European Publisher. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.12.05.15.
Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of Corporate Social Responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275684.
Cho, E. (2023). Time-varying preferences for ESG investments: evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Derivatives and Quantitative Studies, 31(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/JDQS-11-2022-0025.
Cho, K., Han, S. H., Kim, H. J., & Kim, S. (2021). The valuation effects of corporate social responsibility on mergers and acquisitions: Evidence from U.S. target firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 378–388. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2055.
Daugaard, D., & Ding, A. (2022). Global drivers for ESG Performance: The body of knowledge. Sustainability, 14(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042322.
Deng, X., Kang, J., & Low, B. S. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(1), 87–109. https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:110:y:2013:i:1:p:87-109.
Di Simone, L., Petracci, B., & Piva, M. (2022). Economic sustainability, innovation, and the ESG factors: An empirical investigation. Sustainability, 14(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042270.
Edmans, A. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(3), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.021.
Erragragui, E., & Revelli, C. (2016). Is it costly to be both Shariah-compliant and socially responsible? Review of Financial Economics, 31, 64–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2016.08.003.
Ferrell, A., Liang, H., & Renneboog, L. (2016). Socially responsible firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 122(3), 585–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.12.003.
Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future Directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857340.
Gao, S., Meng, F., Wang, W., & Chen, W. (2023). Does ESG always improve corporate performance? Evidence from firm life cycle perspective. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11(January), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1105077.
Gherghina, Ș. C. (2024). Corporate finance and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(7), 308. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17070308.
Habib, A. M., & Mourad, N. (2024). The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices on US firms’ performance: Evidence from the coronavirus crisis. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(1), 2549–2570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01278-w.
Helfaya, A., Morris, R., & Aboud, A. (2023). Investigating the factors that determine the ESG disclosure practices in Europe. Sustainability, 15(6), 5508. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065508.
Hersugondo, H., Ghozali, I., Handriani, E., Trimono, T., & Pamungkas, I. D. (2022). Price index modeling and risk prediction of sharia stocks in Indonesia. Economies, 10(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10010017.
Heubeck, T., & Ahrens, A. (2024). Governing the responsible investment of slack resources in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance: How beneficial are CSR committees? Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05798-6.
Jensen, M. C. (2010). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 22(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2010.00259.x.
Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (2012). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. The Economic Nature of the Firm: A Reader, Third Edition, 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817410.023.
Kao, E. H., Yeh, C.-C., Wang, L.-H., & Fung, H.-G. (2018). The relationship between CSR and performance: Evidence in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 51, 155–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.04.006.
Kraatz, M. S., & Zajac, E. J. (2001). How organizational resources affect strategic change and performance in turbulent environments: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(5), 632–657. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.5.632.10088.
Krüger, P. (2015). Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 115(2), 304–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.008.
Leyva-de la Hiz, D. I., Ferron-Vilchez, V., & Aragon-Correa, J. A. (2019). Do firms’ slack resources influence the relationship between focused environmental innovations and financial performance? More is not always better. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(4), 1215–1227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3772-3.
Li, D., Cao, C., Zhang, L., Chen, X., Ren, S., & Zhao, Y. (2017). Effects of corporate environmental responsibility on financial performance: The moderating role of government regulation and organizational slack. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 1323–1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.129.
Masulis, R. W., & Reza, S. W. (2015). Agency problems of corporate philanthropy. Review of Financial Studies, 28(2), 592–636. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu082.
Mattingly, J. E., & Olsen, L. (2018). Performance outcomes of investing slack resources in corporate social responsibility. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 25(4), 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818762336.
Mutoharoh, & Najihah, N. (2022). Resilience of Companies Listed in Jakarta Islamic Index (JII) During the Pandemic COVID-19 BT - Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems (L. Barolli (ed.); pp. 382–392). Springer International Publishing.
Nguyen, H. T., Phan, H. V, & Vo, H. (2023). Agency problems and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from shareholder-creditor mergers. International Review of Financial Analysis, 90, 102937. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102937.
Odell, J., & Ali, U. (2016). ESG investing in emerging and frontier markets. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 28(2), 96–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12181.
Onuoha, N. E., & Nkwor, N. N. (2021). Slack resources and corporate social responsibility link: Evidence from manufacturing firms in Nigeria. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Business, 4(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.24198/jaab.v4i2.33284.
Peng, L. S., & Isa, M. (2020). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices and performance in shariah firms: Agency or stakeholder theory? Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 16(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.21315/aamjaf2020.16.1.1.
Qi, G. Y., Zeng, S. X., Shi, J. J., Meng, X. H., Lin, H., & Yang, Q. X. (2014). Revisiting the relationship between environmental and financial performance in Chinese industry. Journal of Environmental Management, 145, 349–356. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.010.
Schuler, D. A., & Cording, M. (2006). A corporate social performance-corporate financial performance behavioral model for consumers. The Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 540–558. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.21318916.
Sihombing, M., & Gandakusuma, I. (2023). ESG impact on post M&A company value in Southeast Asia. Jurnal Aplikasi Akuntansi, 8(1), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.29303/jaa.v8i1.271.
Singh, A., Verma, S., & Shome, S. (2023). ESG-CFP relationship: exploring the moderating role of financial slack. International Journal of Emerging Markets, ahead-ofprint(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-03-2022-0536.
Suprabha, K. R., Sreepriya, J., & Prasad, K. (2024). The impact of ESG disclosure on mitigating financial distress: exploring the moderating role of firm life cycle. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-024-00225-8.
Tamasiga, P., Onyeaka, H., Bakwena, M., & Ouassou, E. H. (2024). Beyond compliance: evaluating the role of environmental, social and governance disclosures in enhancing firm value and performance. SN Business & Economics, 4(10), 118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-024-00714-6.
Tan, S.-H., Habibullah, M. S., Tan, S.-K., & Choon, S.-W. (2017). The impact of the dimensions of environmental performance on firm performance in travel and tourism industry. Journal of Environmental Management, 203(Pt 1), 603–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.029.
Yavuz, A. E, Kocaman, B. E., Doğan, M., Hazar, A., Babuşcu, Ş., & Sutbayeva, R. (2024). The impact of corporate governance on sustainability disclosures: A comparison from the perspective of financial and non-financial firms. Sustainability, 16(19), 8400. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198400.
Yuen, M. K., Ngo, T., Le, T. D. Q., & Ho, T. H. (2022). The environment, social and governance (ESG) activities and profitability under COVID-19: evidence from the global banking sector. Journal of Economics and Development, 24(4), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1108/jed-08-2022-0136.
Zhang, Y., Li, J., Jiang, W., Zhang, H., Hu, Y., & Liu, M. (2018). Organizational structure, slack resources and sustainable corporate socially responsible performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(6), 1099–1107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1524.
Zheng, Y., & Feng, Q. (2024). ESG performance, dual green innovation and corporate value—based on empirical evidence of listed companies in China. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05394-8.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Kautsar Riza Salman, Herwin Ardianto, Entis Sutisna, Jana Siti Nor Khasanah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
