Evaluating the Effectiveness of Multidimensional Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) Programs in Reducing School Bullying: A Global Systematic Literature Review of Primary and Secondary Education Interventions (2014-2024)

Aulia Zakiyah Almardiyah; Rika Dwi Agustiningsih; Rovi Husnaini

doi:10.18326/ijip.v7i2.4973

Authors

Aulia Zakiyah Almardiyah Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung
Rika Dwi Agustiningsih Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0117-9535
Rovi Husnaini Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18326/ijip.v7i2.4973

Keywords:

Social-Emotional Learning, Bullying , Students

Abstract

ullying remains a pervasive global issue with adverse effects on students’ psychosocial development, school engagement, and mental health. Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) is increasingly recognized as a holistic, preventive framework that fosters competencies such as self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills, and responsible decision-making, which are directly linked to bullying prevention. This study employed a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) guided by PRISMA 2020 standards and the STAMP framework to ensure methodological rigor and transparency. Six electronic databases were systematically searched, yielding 2,527 records. After screening and quality appraisal, 21 peer-reviewed studies published between 2014 and 2024 were included for thematic synthesis. Findings show that SEL interventions effectively reduce bullying and enhance protective psychosocial factors. Long-term, curriculum-embedded, and multi-component programs demonstrated the most consistent outcomes, while short-term interventions yielded mixed effects. Selective interventions targeting high-risk students produced stronger reductions in victimization, whereas universal programs enhanced resilience and improved classroom climate. Participatory and digital delivery formats increased student engagement but showed variable behavioral impacts. Cultural adaptation emerged as a critical moderator, with contextually tailored programs demonstrating greater effectiveness. SEL represents a promising whole-school strategy for bullying prevention, but its success depends on sustained implementation, program comprehensiveness, and cultural alignment. Practical implications include embedding SEL into curricula and supplementing universal programs with targeted interventions for vulnerable groups. Research limitations include small samples, reliance on self-reports, and limited longitudinal designs. Future research should employ rigorous randomized controlled trials, standardized outcome measures, and cross-cultural approaches to strengthen evidence-based practice and inform global education policy.

References

UNESCO, Behind the numbers: ending school violence and bullying. UNESCO, 2019. doi: 10.54675/TRVR4270.

Z.-Y. Han, Z.-Y. Ye, and B.-L. Zhong, “School bullying and mental health among adolescents: a narrative review,” Transl Pediatr, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 463–472, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.21037/tp-2024-512.

X.-Q. Liu and X. Wang, “Adolescent suicide risk factors and the integration of social-emotional skills in school-based prevention programs,” World J Psychiatry, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 494–506, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i4.494.

D. Olweus, Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. in Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 1993, pp. xii, 140.

C. Yang, J. D. Sharkey, L. A. Reed, E. D.-S. psychology, and undefined 2020, “Cyberbullying victimization and student engagement among adolescents: Does school climate matter?,” psycnet.apa.org, 2020, doi: 10.1037/spq0000353.

U. Bronfenbrenner, “Contexts of child rearing: Problems and prospects,” American Psychologist, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 844–850, 1979, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.844.

N. Top, J. Liew, and W. Luo, “Family and School Influences on Youths’ Behavioral and Academic Outcomes: Cross-Level Interactions between Parental Monitoring and Character Development Curriculum,” Journal of Genetic Psychology, vol. 178, no. 2, pp. 108–118, 2017, doi: 10.1080/00221325.2017.1279118.

“CASEL. 2020. CASEL Framework.pdf.”

S. S. Fredrick and L. N. Jenkins, “Social Emotional Learning and Peer Victimization Among Secondary School Students,” Int Journal of Bullying Prevention, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 68–78, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s42380-021-00113-7.

A. B. Nickerson, S. S. Fredrick, K. P. Allen, and L. N. Jenkins, “Social emotional learning (SEL) practices in schools: Effects on perceptions of bullying victimization,” Journal of School Psychology, vol. 73, pp. 74–88, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2019.03.002.

D. L. Espelage, C. A. Rose, and J. R. Polanin, “Social-Emotional Learning Program to Reduce Bullying, Fighting, and Victimization Among Middle School Students With Disabilities,” Remedial and Special Education, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 299–311, 2015, doi: 10.1177/0741932514564564.

M. Fekkes et al., “Effects of the Dutch Skills for Life program on the health behavior, bullying, and suicidal ideation of secondary school students,” emerald.com, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 2–15, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1108/HE-05-2014-0068/FULL/HTML.

B. H. Smith and S. Low, “The Role of Social-Emotional Learning In Bullying Prevention Efforts,” Theory into Practice, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 280–287, 2013, doi: 10.1080/00405841.2013.829731.

A. Valido et al., “Pilot Evaluation of the Elementary Social-Emotional Learning Program Sources of Strength,” School Mental Health, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 528–539, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s12310-023-09567-0.

J. A. Durlak, R. P. Weissberg, A. B. Dymnicki, R. D. Taylor, and K. B. Schellinger, “The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: a meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions,” Child Dev, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 405–432, 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x.

R. D. Taylor, E. Oberle, J. A. Durlak, and R. P. Weissberg, “Promoting Positive Youth Development Through School-Based Social and Emotional Learning Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Follow-Up Effects,” Child Dev, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 1156–1171, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1111/cdev.12864.

M. J. Page et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” BMJ, p. n71, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.

A. Rogge, L. Anter, D. Kunze, K. Pomsel, and G. Willenbrock, “Standardized Sampling for Systematic Literature Reviews (STAMP Method): Ensuring Reproducibility and Replicability,” MaC, vol. 12, p. 7836, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.17645/mac.7836.

J. Agley et al., “Effects of ACT out! social issue theater on social-emotional competence and bullying in youth and adolescents: cluster randomized controlled trial,” JMIR Mental Health, vol. 8, no. 1, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.2196/25860.

D. L. Espelage, S. Low, M. J. V. Ryzin, and J. R. Polanin, “Clinical Trial of Second Step Middle School Program: Impact on Bullying, Cyberbullying, Homophobic Teasing, and Sexual Harassment Perpetration,” School Psychology Review, vol. 44, no. 4, 2015.

D. L. Espelage, S. Low, J. R. Polanin, and E. C. Brown, “Clinical trial of Second Step© middle-school program: Impact on aggression & victimization,” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, vol. 37, pp. 52–63, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.007.

D. L. Espelage, C. A. Rose, and J. R. Polanin, “Social-Emotional Learning Program to Promote Prosocial and Academic Skills Among Middle School Students With Disabilities,” Remedial and Special Education, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 323–332, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1177/0741932515627475.

D. L. Espelage, M. V. Ryzin, and M. H. violence, “Trajectories of bully perpetration across early adolescence: Static risk factors, dynamic covariates, and longitudinal outcomes.,” psycnet.apa.org, 2017, doi: 10.1037/vio0000095.

A. J. Forber-Pratt, R. Hanebutt, B. Minotti, N. A. Cobb, and K. Peagram, “Social-Emotional Learning and Motivational Interviews With Middle School Youth With Disabilities or At-Risk for Disability Identification,” Education and Urban Society, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 33–65, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1177/00131245221110557.

X. Qiao, Y. Wang, and J. Zhao, “Anti-School Bullying Forum Theatre in Rural Boarding Middle School in China – Empirical Analysis Based on Programme Practice,” dateasia.tefo.hk, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://www.dateasia.tefo.hk/index.php/dateasia/article/view/124

B. J. Rezaei, K. Hashemian, and M. Mojtabaei, “The comparison of efficacy of peace instruction and cooperative social – emotional learning on bullying in female adolescents,” Psychological Science, vol. 22, no. 131, 2023.

M. C. E. van de Sande, M. Fekkes, R. F. W. Diekstra, C. Gravesteijn, P. L. Kocken, and R. Reis, “Low-achieving adolescent students’ perspectives on their interactions with classmates. An exploratory study to inform the implementation of a social emotional learning program in prevocational education,” Children and Youth Services Review, vol. 156, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107263.

M. L. Ybarra, T. L. Prescott, and D. L. Espelage, “Stepwise Development of a Text Messaging-Based Bullying Prevention Program for Middle School Students (BullyDown),” JMIR mHealth uHealth, vol. 4, no. 2, p. e60, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4936.

C. Yang, C. Chen, X. Lin, and M. K. Chan, “School-wide social emotional learning and cyberbullying victimization among middle and high school students: Moderating role of school climate.,” psycnet.apa.org, 2021, doi: 10.1037/spq0000423.

Z. Yöntem and M. Ağirkan, “What are the Psychosocial Predictors of Peer Bullying Among Middle School Students?,” School Mental Health, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 201–216, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s12310-024-09719-w.

S. S. Fredrick, S. Coyle, and J. King, “Middle and high school teachers’ perceptions of cyberbullying prevention and digital citizenship,” Wiley Online Library, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 1958–1978, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1002/PITS.22844.

D. L. Espelage, C. A. Rose, and J. R. Polanin, “Social-Emotional Learning Program to Reduce Bullying, Fighting, and Victimization Among Middle School Students With Disabilities,” Remedial and Special Education, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 299–311, Sep. 2015, doi: 10.1177/0741932514564564.